StrategyWiki:Collaboration of the Month

 Current Collaboration of the Month

Every month, a Collaboration of the Month will be selected by using this page. Using cooperative editing, the aim of the collaboration is to complete a major task or greatly improve an article by the end of the month. A list of former collaborations can be found in the archive.

How to Nominate
Anyone may nominate a collaboration. To nominate an article, copy the nomination template below, fill it out accordingly and then put it at the bottom of the list. Leave the  templates as they are, and they will automatically fill in the current date for you.

Copy/paste the following nomination template:

article name
Nominated , .

Support

Oppose

Comments
 * A description of why the article should be the Good article Collaboration of the week followed by --~

Voting
Please feel free to vote on as many candidates as you like. Any registered user may vote for an article, as long as the account's first edit occurred before the nomination.

Collaboration of the month nominations are evaluated at the end of every month. The number of oppose votes is subtracted from the number of support votes, producing a net value for each nomination. The guide with the highest net value each month becomes that month's collaboration. In the case of a tie, the earliest nomination is chosen.

Nominations will be removed in one of three instances:
 * 1) The nomination is selected as the new Collaboration of the month.
 * 2) The nomination has been live for six months and has a net value of zero.
 * 3) The nomination has been live for 12 months.

Hamsterz 2
Nominated July 31, 2008

Support
 * 1) Melon247 (Dog&#39;s Life&#39;s No. 1 fan) 12:55, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
 * 16:11, 31 July 2008 (CDT)

Oppose
 * 1) najzere T 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * It's a really popular game, so I hear, and one person who really wanted it said that everybody they knew had the game. I had to get mine Preowned because there were hardly any in the shop! --Melon247 (Dog&#39;s Life&#39;s No. 1 fan) 12:55, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
 * Well, I haven't heard anything online, and since I don't have any game magazine subscriptions at the moment I can't really contest how popular it is. I really don't understand the whole virtual pet genre craze...  -- 16:11, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
 * Additionally, this game is called Hamsterz 2 in the UK, Hamsterz 2008 in AU, and Petz: Hamsterz 2 in the US. -- 16:14, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
 * I don't think this game is very notable or widely played. - najzere T 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Petz
Nominated February 21, 2009.

Support
 * 1) -- Me lon  2  4  7  09:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) najzere T 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Duke Ruckley Talk 16:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * A whole series of games so the chances are that quite a few people will have at least one of them. And they're so cute! -- Me lon  2  4  7  09:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm generally opposed to collabs on multiple games at once. If you were talking specifically about the category itself, that may be a job for the cleanup project.-- Duke  Ruckley Talk 16:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Chrono Trigger
Nominated March 1, 2009.

Support
 * 1) ~ Viz er  oth ~-- 06:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) najzere T 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Duke Ruckley Talk 16:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 05:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * The guide seems to be doing fairly well, and the game is a fairly popular recent release. As a remake of a classic game, it is bound to be a guide that will see some use in the long term. --~ Viz er  oth ~-- 06:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This guide is already at completion stage 4. A good, month long collaboration could see this guide become the next one featured. - najzere T 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * With the recent release on the DS, it'd be nice to see this one finished up. Plus, a featured guide for a popular game like this would be really good for the site.-- Duke  Ruckley Talk 16:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's been the CotM before. -- 04:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you sure it was CotM? It's not in the archive.  Maybe it was Promising Guide of the Month?-- Duke  Ruckley Talk 15:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Addendum: It was PGotM for September 2007.-- Duke  Ruckley Talk 15:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * If this gets elected. LETS GET IT DONE! We're gonna need as much help as we can get, because the entire guide needs to be revised for multiple versions of the game (each has its own unique names for certain things, although the PlayStation version isn't so different). -- 05:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts II
Nominated March 19, 2009.

Support
 * 1) Jammi568 23:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Duke Ruckley Talk 16:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * I personally have tried to put in as much detail on the walkthrough pages and appendices, such as the enemy pages. It would be a shame to see that effort go to waste. --Jammi568 23:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Pikmin 2
Nominated April 14, 2009.

Support
 * 1) Shinypolitoed 19:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Despite the fact that it isn't as well known as Halo 3 or SSBB, Pikmin 2 was an excellent game. And with the upcoming Pikmin 3 as well as the Wii release of Pikmin 2, it's probably going to be talked about. I still enjoy this game today, and it deserves a guide.--Shinypolitoed 19:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Knights in the Nightmare
Nominated May 24, 2009.

Support
 * 1) Zaiqukaj 09:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


 * The previous games relating to this one (Riviera: The Promised Land and Yggdra Union: We'll Never Fight Alone) had pretty slick looking graphics and music. The game is being published by Atlus and is being released to North America on June 2, 2009. In my region advertisements for pre-ordering the game were up earlier this month and Atlus is one of the better known RPG releasing companies so there may be a good deal of people getting the game. --Zaiqukaj 09:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)