StrategyWiki:Staff lounge/2011/August

Footer Nav Help
I was wondering if it was possible to have three "next" and/or "previous" links on the footer navs. I was looking at the template, and it seemed to me that you could only have two. But, I don't really know much about templates, so I thought I'd ask. And if I can't do it with the current template, how can I create a new one? This would be really helpful for the 999 walkthrough I'm working on, because the player has three choices for where to go next. Thanks. SnakeTheZeppo 21:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you list out the three pages you want to link to and specify the footer nav you want it on, and we can show by example :). -- Prod (Talk) 21:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * To get the result you're wanting you need to divide the links with, which will show up as an arrow and vertical bar just like what the template makes itself. I've updated Door 7 like this so you can see how it works. For multiple previous pages do the same sort of thing with the opposite arrow. If you need any help with this just ask. :) Garrett (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)


 * That is exactly what I needed! Thank you! -- SnakeTheZeppo 14:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Lylat Wiki template
Hello all. How are you?

For those of you who don't know, I proposed an idea to user:prod back in January (through the forums and on skype), and after receiving his approval, discussing the idea with members of the Lylat Wiki community, we have agreed to form a partnership, similar to what you guys have with Zelda Wiki, Bulbapedia and WiKirby.

With user:prod's permission, i have set up an interwiki "for more information" template, Template:Lylat Wiki, so that it can be used on Star Fox articles, in a similar fashion to how Template:WiKirby links to WiKirby.

After which, prod asked me to inform you guys about it.

Here's to a good partnership, :) Tacopill 05:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC).
 * The dark background seems a bit out of place. I'd suggest just sticking to a default box look. They're a fellow NIWA wiki, so any other thoughts on having a partnership with these guys? -- Prod (Talk) 05:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)