StrategyWiki talk:Community Portal

This page is for discussion of general community issues. To start a new thread click here. Resolved threads are gradually archived; see the archives box below.

Key Issues:
 * License
 * Articles to delete
 * Others to be added...

Table of Contents markup
Over a number of guides, I've seen ToC markup which isn't good. It's using outdated, deprecated, non-semantically loaded tags to do the jobs of titles. (I am referring to ToCs which use to emphasise section titles - an example would be The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time.) Instead of this, they should be using headings (usually === Section title === ) to make it more accessible and semantically correct. If you don't know what semantics are, either look them up, or don't reply. ;-) --DrBob (Talk) 12:40, 26 June 2006 (PDT)


 * You're about to see why I did that. Check out The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time again. (If I had used == 's, the new Table of Contents would break the page.  ech elon  16:41, 26 June 2006 (PDT)

A new table of contents
What are your thoughts on The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time's new table of contents system? It needs a bit of polishing, but I think this will become a standard for larger guides.  ech elon  16:44, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * It's pretty nice, and I think it should be automatically visible. Or at least easier to notice (it took me a second to see where it is). Alex 16:51, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'm thinking of storing the show-hide preference in a cookie. You're right about making the link more apparant, though. We need a small icon or something to go with it. Maybe two images: an up and down triange.  ech elon  17:10, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I think it should be shown by default on the first page. Right now it's little different from the old cover page idea, a click is still required to see the TOC. I also prefer the sidenav just a little bit more since it's always there and makes use of the otherwise wasted right-hand column. GarrettTalk 17:53, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * The sidebar required for the sidenav TOC isn't present in other skins. I am thinking of an option that lets the user choose whichever type of navbar they want, though. (I didn't by any means delete the sidenav script.) Currently, I must say that I prefer this new inline TOC to the sidebar one; it allows much more options, such as organized multi-column navigations and inline images. Plus, you don't have to scroll down the page to see the whole TOC, and that's a very annoying part of the sidenav TOC. Again, I'll still try to find a solution that allows the user to choose either one though. Just keep in mind that I am not done by any means--the new inline TOC needs some kind of image to make it more obvious, a little tidying, a saved user preference, an init variable, etc.  ech elon  21:45, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I think I made some useful changes that appears to work very well on both bluecloud and monobook. The .js file can be edited so that the nav always shows up by default, but I think having it hidden by default is best (unless you can store it in cookies, that would be even better).  I had to edit a few files to get it to work the best, and couldn't find the "GuideTOC" style anywhere so I used something without that.  Sine that style probably won't be used outside of that template I don't see why it should be a reference in some file that is uneditable, you know?  I think this is simple and clean, while being very useful at the same time.  It could use some polish of course, but I think it's even better now. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 22:57, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * It looks nicer, but the show/hide doesn't seem to work anymore. (I did dump my cache...) Do you plan to reimplement that? I think the hiding feature is the best attribute of the template. I'll try to add cookies support tomorrow.  ech elon  23:04, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Try it again. You changed the dynamic nav stuff to be specific to TOC related things.  This chang allows dynamic nav to be used in all kinds of things, including the todo lists (check your user page in a little bit to see the changes I'm making to that). -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 23:15, 26 June 2006 (PDT)
 * When you click on "show" in the new ToC, there is a minor bug where it still says "Show" underneath "hide". In other words, you get two words meshed together.  Can that be fixed?  Other than that, everything looks great!--Dukeruckley 05:59, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'm not that good at javascript so I'm going to leave this to echelon or drbob. It's odd that this bug doesn't exist when using monobook, but does in MediaWiki:BlueCloud.js, even though the .js files are exactly the same...how strange eh?  Good luck guys :). -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 08:23, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Eh? You called? What do you want me to do? (BTW, I think the ToC template is too big at the moment: imho the border should be removed, to let the ToC contents fit in with the rest of the page.) --DrBob (Talk) 08:52, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Well, the TOC at the top of every zelda page (and actually the dynamic navigation system as a whole) functions without that little bug duke mentioned only when it's on monobook, on bluecloud it has that bug he mentioned, and with your "BTW", are you referring to the zelda TOC page itself or the dynamic nav system used in all game nav? -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 09:38, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'll take a look at the bug later, but I am referring to the dynamic nav system itself. IMHO, the "Table of Contents" link in the All Game Nav proper (i.e. the one which has always been there) should be emphasised more, and when clicked, expand the full table of contents, with a light grey border around the bottom, left and right to separate it from the content, and perhaps with a "tab" effect applied to the Table of Contents link the user just clicked. I don't like the fact that it's expanded by default (takes up far too much space), and the current border and grey title bar doesn't fit in; neither does the reduced width. --DrBob (Talk) 10:04, 27 June 2006 (PDT)

I believe I get what you're saying. It is strange to have a TOC link and also have the dynamic nav, and if possible I would like to be able to have clicking the TOC link bring down the whole nav. Perhaps the entire content of all game nav should have a border around it to seperate it from the content? I think that would make things clearer. It's kind of hard to get exactly what you mean, but if you set up a test All game nav to mess with styles it might be easier to follow. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 11:11, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I've fixed the show/hide problem (a dirty hack, because the function creating the show/hide links was being called twice and I'm not about to debug that) in BlueCloud, but not Monobook because you said the problem doesn't occur with it. I've also created a WIP mockup of what I was thinking of for the ToC stuff, incorporating your idea of bordering the all game nav entirely. --DrBob (Talk) 12:37, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I think that is very cool, I changed the Counter-Strike:_Source/Table_of_Contents page so that it didn't include the infobox. Perhaps it can be set up so that the infobox is shown on the page whe you view it, but when it is included it sets up the TOC horizontally?  It seems like a lot of effort for this to be done on most multi-page guides, but I definitly like the style.  I think this will look amazing on the zelda guide, just each guide will have to figure out exactly what will be included in the template. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 20:25, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I made some more changes, so it appears exactly the same on the TOC page itself, but when used in the template it looks much cleaner. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 20:33, 27 June 2006 (PDT)

'''Whooops... I meant to actually put this on the Todo Talk page, I'll move it there now'''

Another odd fluke... Using MediaWiki:BlueCloud.js, when I click on "edit" where it says "Games I'd Like to Work on Eventually" on my user page it comes up with the edit box for the section below it "Games Currently Playing". Likewise, when I click on edit for "Games Currently Playing" it goes to edit "backburner" which is below that one. Above the To Do list, it work correctly so I think its a problem with the Todo template. Thoughts? (Not a big deal, but something that might need to be addressed at some point).--Dukeruckley 08:04, 28 June 2006 (PDT)

Another note: It does the same thing with other users as well.--Dukeruckley 08:08, 28 June 2006 (PDT)

End random section that doesn't belong here


 * Starting a new indent. While I like the look of the menu that Mason did more than mine (it's more compact, more noticiable to the user, and a little more organized), I can't help but feel that it was a step backwards:
 * The new version is attempting to be the show/hide template from Wikipedia, thus in essence trying to be a more general script. The one I designed was specific for the purposes of the Table of Contents alone. In my opinion, the biggest problem with the new one is that it requires a seperate bar for the "show/hide" portion of the Table of Contents, and that looks cluttered. I don't know how many saw the one before, and though it was certainly not perfect, it made the "show/hide" link a part of the All_Games_Nav itself. I think the new one, while more noticable, is a bit too jumbled looking. We need something that employs the benefits of both, but we absolutely have to get rid of that bar at the top; it looks far too cluttered.
 * The original ToC that I designed was not set into any formal kind of standard. Different guides may require different types of data displayed under the Table of Contents--perhaps diagrams or images. While I'm not sure if this is the case or not, but the new one seems like it wouldn't fit those types of things.
 * I hope I'm not trying to backstep or be redundant, but I do feel that we should revert back. The show/hide template for Wikipedia will have uses here, I just don't feel we should use it for the Table of Contents. (Sorry Mason, I know you must've put a lot of work into it :(  ech elon  13:09, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean here, although it has been a long day. Have you looked at my spiffied up version?
 * I kind of get what you're saying, but I think as it is now it's got it's advantages over the older one, but if you have improvements to this or even a completly different style that has more advantages I think it'd work great. The spiffed up version DrBob made is quite a big improvement over the one I made and I think it takes into account some of your ideas.  Also, I didn't get the show/hide on the version you had before, although it IS possible that was my fault.  I think the bold change you did with the all game nav got us into a Bold-revert-discuss cycle which is one of the best ways of getting the most out of this.  Feel free to change the one I made, but I DO think it is an improvement over what was there before, even if it has it's faults which is completly open to change which DrBob has done. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 15:30, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * The version that DrBob is working on looks great! This is the first I've seen of it. It's pretty much a better looking mix of your version and mine. The only thing that might be problematic in his version: I'm not sure about the use of ==Heading== markup, since doing so causes the wiki-generated table of contents to go berzerk. If we could replace the headings with and bold markup, it won't interfere with the toc and would be flawless.
 * As for the show/hide on my version, DOM javascript turned the old "Table of Contents" link into a "Show Table of Contents/Hide Table of Contents" link. It was rather obscure, and it needed some kind of image or something--DrBob's version fixes that and looks even better than before. Let's go with his, and if there are any further improvements to be made, we can make them when they arise.
 * That said, I think this is pretty cool. Our top navigation menu is really slick!  ech elon  19:26, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * DrBob's template looks really nice, but I really think we should change the All Game Nav template. Right now, the Introduction and Table of Contents just link straight back to the main page, so its pretty redundant. I think the always visible part of the Table of Contents thing should be customized to the guide, with links to the main sections, such as Walkthrough, Extras, Codes, and stuff like that, instead of the default main page, intro, and toc. --blendmaster 13:16, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Mine is being developed as a drop-in new version for the All Game Nav, so I can't see any problem with bringing such changes into mine, and then moving them forward to All Game Nav. Your point that many guides just have the ToC and intro redirect to the main page is very valid: we should look around for some other standard pages to put in instead (although the link to the ToC should stay as all guides should have a separate ToC page when this new All Game Nav is rolled out, due to the fact that it references them). --DrBob (Talk) 14:06, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'd migrate your version in as the default now, then continue using it as an in progress version. If all game nav is going to be used on every guide (as it's name implies), we may want to have it protected at some point, and having a test version would be great too if we get it in the template namespace also.
 * But the different links could easily be set up, we just have to figure what would be the best setup. I don't think an "intro" page needs to exist, having a page for the game title (the main page), then a TOC, then a walkthrough would be good enough I think.  The rest can go in the TOC dropdown. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 22:21, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I think we need "Walkthrough" as an introduction on how to use the walktrhough portion of the guide. (If there are specifics that the reader must pay attention to, etc.) There is also an ulterior motive for this: SEO (Yahoo *really* loves StrategyWiki). I suggest a "Cheats", "Tips", or "Codes" section for the All_Game_Nav as well. Perhaps the Qif can be used to specify which elements are shown. As for the link to the Table of Contents? That's slightly important: it serves as a link to edit it. Of course it could also be obscured, though.  ech elon  19:24, 1 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I've moved mine forward to the All Game Nav page proper, and removed the "Introduction" link, but I haven't added any extra links, pending decisions in this discussion. Think, people! --DrBob (Talk) 18:25, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I would try going with a link to an Extra/Appendices page, where all of the cheats, weapons information, enemy information, stage information, etc. link off of a main page. For example, in OoT, this would be under Extras, or in the Biohazard guide, this would be under Appendices. But this can't apply to every guide, since some are split into smaller sections or don't have a universal name. Anyone else think an Extras/Appendices link is important and maybe consider every guide to have an Extras page with all miscalleneous information? --Antaios 05:12, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I don't think such a general title is what we need. We need to identify something present in most guides with a similar level of specificity as "Walkthrough". I really don't think a "Miscellaneous" page (which is basically what you're suggesting) would be useful. "Cheats" would be good. --DrBob (Talk) 05:59, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I'm for a "Cheats" section. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 06:53, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I suppose so. Would the Cheats section have Secrets/Easter Eggs too, or just like Gameshark codes or button combination cheat codes? --Antaios 07:46, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * The cheats section would have whatever's appropriate for the guide. :-) I've added it to All Game Nav. --DrBob (Talk) 08:26, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Ok, cool. I was just making sure. ; ). Looks good though. --Antaios 19:41, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Sorry, haven't been around in a while. Been very busy...  I don't think a Cheats section should be part of the Nav.  Particularly because some games don't have any cheats.  For example, Earthbound (which I know has been used for a lot of examples lately, but oh well) has no cheats in it.  This means that a red link will be at the top of every page, making it look less complete.  I'd recommend something more like "Secrets" which would include anything from cheats to easter eggs, etc.  Or maybe "Tips and Tricks" would be more appropriate.  It should be something less specific, basically.-- Duke  Ruckley  20:27, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I think Extras would be good for a standard section, which could include pretty much anything. Then, you just have to include an option in All Game Nav to include more custom sections, which could be done with a custom attribute with the default option as blank, the wikicode being . --blendmaster 22:31, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Well, I went ahead and added a custom attribute. It uses the qif template, but the implementation isn't that good. If someone wants to make it better, please do. --blendmaster 22:52, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I really don't mind. Redlinks at the top of guides are bad, not many guides would use the cheats section, and now that you've added a custom section blendmaster, I'll remove the cheats link. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 01:01, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * The new table of contents looks really good, but I don't think there should be a hidden table of contents on the main page of a guide. If you look at The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time with the table of contents hidden, there really is no indication of where to go next. The main page should have the table of contents non hidden by default, preferably below the intro rather then with the All Game Nav template. Also, there should be links to the Getting Started and Walkthrough portions of the game. Example: Main page of [[Earthbound]. Although it kind of goes overboard with images (I'm sorry), I think it is a good example for a main page of a guide. It has a full table of contents without an extra click, and links to sections that the reader will want to follow if they want to see more of the guide.
 * Just one more thing. If the entire table of contents is under the show/hide thing, is the link to a standalone Table of Contents necessary? I realize the page is there to be included in the All Game Nav, but if all the standalone page adds is a spoiler template in the noinclude section, then why link to it anyway if its on every page in the Walkthrough? A solution would be to make the include page in All Game Nav, the "lite" table of contents, be under Game Name/toc and not meant to be read standalone. Then make the link version of the table of contents have fleshed out descriptions of each section, to make it worth a standalone page, something like the Table of Contents of Super Smash Bros. Melee, only better. I realize the same thing could be done by including numerous includeonly tags within the Table of contents, but that would make the markup hell. --blendmaster 11:54, 11 July 2006 (CDT) (continued below)


 * I'm split between referencing the table of contents page under a heading on the main page, which would introduce problems when the ToC page is split into columns, or hacking the Javascript so that the ToC is expanded on the main page. Both have their advantages, but I'd be tempted to go for the second one. There is a discussion somewhere about optional extra links for the All Game Nav template.
 * The discussion about the link to the ToC has been had before, and it's staying. It provides a link to the page so it can be edited, and once I get around to doing the Javascript, it'll control the show/hide of the ToC in the All Game Nav. --DrBob 16:30, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I think that was DrBob ^. The Problem with just making the All Game Nav defaultly expanded on the main page is that the intro is then pushed down farther off the page. A hack I did for Earthbound was to make enclose everything on the main page in noincludes except the Table of Contents stuff, and kept the Table of contents page to a redirect. That way, the main page still gets a good table of contents, and whenever the All Game Nav calls the Table of Contents page, it will redirect and fetch the main page, minus the intro, infobox, and any categories the main page is, which leaves just the table of contents. The only problems I can think of with this is that people editing the main page might wonder what the noinclude tags are for and remove them, plus the fact its not as clear as a having a separate Table of Contents page. --blendmaster 16:45, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I can see where you're coming from, but the answer is to have the main page reference the table of contents, not the other way round. That keeps things a lot simpler (no noincludes everywhere), and more organised. --DrBob (Talk) 16:56, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Is there are way to keep the toc minimized when the page loads? In firefox, it always stays open while the page opens and then closes, which is a annoying. --blendmaster 12:39, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I'll look into it, but I can't think of a good one off the top of my head. --DrBob (Talk) 12:58, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
 * It should be possible to use CSS's display:none (which takes effect immediately) and then overrule that with, er, display:auto (?) as soon as the JS kicks in. In other words the CSS change would have to be reverted after the JS contracts the menu, otherwise you've still got the very same problem. GarrettTalk 21:20, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Good idea. Done. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 00:58, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Excellent suggestion Garrett. It works like a charm now. ; ) --Antaios 09:21, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

Back and forward links
On the bottom of pages, there are little back and forward through the Walkthrough links, like &lt;&lt; Hyrule Castle | Goron City&gt;&gt;. There should be slightly more of a presence of these links. Another plug example is Template:Earthbound/Nav. What would be better is something styled the same as the All Game Nav, but with only Walkthrough links in the show/hide section and the always visible links would be to Back, Here, and Next in the Walkthrough. Like Template:Earthbound/Nav only standardized. --blendmaster 11:54, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * (I've split up your comment; I hope you don't mind.) I like this idea, and I think I'll try and get round to implementing something for it soon. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 15:01, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * kind of like this? --blendmaster 16:27, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yeah, but without all the big images. :-P --DrBob (Talk) 16:56, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * It has been "improved", but it looks as if its missing somthing, don't you think? --blendmaster 17:41, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I've spiffied it up a bit, cleaned up the markup, and made it fit in more with All Game Nav. --DrBob (Talk) 12:57, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Ok, looks fine now. But how are the hidden links going to be added in? Unless you made yet another table of contents page to include that just lists the walkthrough part, then you'd have to enter all the links as a variable in the template every time you used it. --blendmaster 11:44, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I thought you had that sorted. I do suppose the best way to do it would be to add another page, yes. --DrBob (Talk) 13:51, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

Open invitation for Pac-Man Patterns
In the spirit of StrategyWiki, I started a Pac-Man Patterns section in the Pac-Man entry, so I thought it would be fun if all the usual members of StrategyWiki contributed their favorite pattern to the page. To be honest, I think it's the first of it's kind, a public repository of Pac-Man patterns. If it fills up with lots of contributions, who knows, we could get a lot of press in video game blogs like Joystiq or Kotaku. I look forward to seeing any of your additions! Feedback is welcome. Thanks! Procyon 19:01, 28 June 2006 (PDT)


 * Left comment on that pages talk. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 07:33, 29 June 2006 (PDT)

Marking GFDL articles
I've created Template:GFDL_Article to mark all the existing articles so we can begin the relicensing process. Is everyone ready to do this? (Do you think this template is sufficient?)  ech elon  19:48, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Looks fine. I don't know that images need tagging though, Wikipedia and the like merrily use images regardless of what copyleft license they use. How are you going to identify untagged pages though, with a database query? GarrettTalk 19:56, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Special:Allpages, unfortunately.  ech  elon  21:02, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
 * Are we supposed to mark every page within the article as well (see: Chrono Trigger) or just the introduction/table of contents?  I'm asking because Garrett did every page (as far as I could tell) while Mason did not.--Dukeruckley 08:19, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'm not sure if we legally have to do more then this, but I think if we change the template to something like "This page, and all subpages of this guide are under GNUFDL...blah blah" then I think that would be better, if we actually can do that. If we absolutly MUST do every page, then we'll do every page. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 09:49, 29 June 2006 (PDT)

There are a few suggestions I have, and I'm going to get garret in here to check them out: -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 22:26, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * 1) We should only mark the main guide page, with a note saying all subpages are also under GNU, if this is legally possible AT ALL, it should be done, since you must go through the main page to get to subpages (almost always), I think it would be legit.
 * 2) We should put the single tag at the bottom of the main page, to not distract from the reader, but legally cover our butt. The tag is for almost noone, but still needs to be there, and it should be as minimal as possible.
 * 3) I thought there was another...maybe not...


 * Hm. Well, the problem is that the GFDL really wasn't designed to accommodate for pages as separate as those of a wiki. But yes this is getting silly. I think I'll stop and just do cover pages for now, and if someone whines later we can correct it then. That's the DMCA for ya. :) I'll also suitably amend the template. GarrettTalk 22:36, 29 June 2006 (PDT)

It looks like they are all done, can we do the transition now? That would be best I think, and I'll set up a page for all contributors to offer to release their content into the SWPL. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 08:30, 30 June 2006 (PDT)


 * I made that page, and I'll begin spamming talk pages for contributors to the guides that are GNU FDL. I'll simply paste  onto their talk pages, and it should go quickly, feel free to clean up that template while this is going on. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 08:46, 30 June 2006 (PDT)

Shortcuts
For some reason the Alt-E shortcut (and some others, perhaps all) to edit a page isn't working, this would be extremly useful if I want to go through and tag some/all guides with the GFDL template, so if someone can figure out how to put that in and get it to work, that'd be great. Thanks! -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 09:54, 29 June 2006 (PDT)
 * I'll put it on my todo list, but it won't be really high-priority. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 10:14, 29 June 2006 (PDT)

Collaboration of the Month / Guide of the Month
July has come up on us, so would anyone like to suggest a Collaboration of the Month or Guide of the Month for the front page? Our collaboration will probably be related to switching from GFDL to SWPL. As for the guide, I'm not sure. What do you guys think?  ech elon  19:13, 1 July 2006 (PDT)


 * My Half-Life walkthrough =D. As for a collaboration, defitenly the SWPL license. --Antaios 20:26, 1 July 2006 (PDT)


 * The Final Fantasy VII walkthrough seems like a fairly good one as well. It still has a few sections that could use some meat to them and it needs pictures, but it is a decent choice I'd say.  Although, Half-Life might be a better choice because we just had an action-RPG, so a different genre might be a good idea.--Dukeruckley 05:01, 3 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Are there any guides here that are actually done? as in a or  quality? Because those would make perfect guides of the month. I know StrategyWiki is fairly new, but if we had a guide of the month with a whole bunch of red links, it might make us look bad. Maybe as we are still small, it'd be better to put somthing like a Most Promising Guide, or somthing that suggests its a good guide to edit or somthing. The collaboration of the month still should be the SWPL or Open Media license. --blendmaster 11:52, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Final Fantasy VII is definitely a quality guide.  There are few (if any, haven't checked all of it) red links and the entire walkthrough is complete save for some minor optional bits of information.  I'd recommend it the most I think.  A Most Promising Guide would be an idea as well and we can always phase it out when we have some completed guides.-- Duke  Ruckley  11:55, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * It looks like a good choice, yes, but before it can be listed I really think the front page could be cleared up:


 * Add an infobox and box artwork
 * Make the "Materia" and "Equipment" appendices a link to pages
 * Deal with the "stuff to be merged" section
 * Make sure it's categorised fully and properly


 * (Don't know who that ^ was) The problem with Final Fantasy VII is that it doesn't use the shiny new All Game Nav or anything fancy like that. Anyway, the main page has been sitting at none at all for a while. Should we just replace it with Most Promising Guide or somthing soon? --blendmaster 17:31, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I think it was me. *looks innocent* --DrBob (Talk) 17:53, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

Rename the license?
I don't like "StrategyWiki Public License", for several reasons. First, "Public" is unnecessary and might make people think there's some connection with the GNU GPL; also including our name is a mistake. As echelon said, "Imagine if all wikis used a single license and it made copying possible between all wikis. Wouldn't that be awesome?" Yes it would, but I can't imagine other sites would be particularly keen on using a license that so openly belongs to another site. Dropping the Public and removing our name from it are primary goals if we want anyone but us to ever use this. GarrettTalk 04:39, 2 July 2006 (PDT)


 * So you'd have it called "License" then? :-P I agree with you here, and I think now is the time to change the name if ever, before it gets too complex. --DrBob (Talk) 04:52, 2 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Guys, check out the suggestions in User:Echelon/Open Media! Leave comments on the talk page there.  ech elon  23:53, 5 July 2006 (PDT)

Image upload warning
I'm going through categorising all the images, and it's a pain. I have a horrible feeling that people are going to continue to upload uncategorised images, so why not put some Javascript on the image upload form which checks for a category link, and pops up a message box chiding the user if the output of  is true. --DrBob (Talk) 06:43, 2 July 2006 (PDT)
 * I suggest looking into the uncategorized images page sporewiki has set up and have that installed. But if this code gets put it, If you could explain how it's done, then that'd be appreciated echelon, thanks :). -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 16:42, 2 July 2006 (PDT)
 * I think we should do both. :-P The message on form submission to stop more uncategorised images being uploaded, and the uncategorised images page to help deal with the ones which have already been uploaded. Looks quite simple to install the uncategorised images page, and thanks must go to MediaWiki (and SporeWiki) for it. :-D --DrBob (Talk) 23:00, 2 July 2006 (PDT)

Image guidelines
I've finished writing the image guidelines and they're up for comment. If you've got any gripes or suggestions (particularly for things I've missed), please mention them on the talk page for the guidelines. --DrBob (Talk) 12:17, 5 July 2006 (PDT)

Control Images
I notice DrBob has been going around putting up the Needcontrols template on a lot of guides lately, with requests for controls for specific systems. As of posting, the only controller buttons are my gamecube buttons and the only page that uses them (to my knowledge) is the Super Smash Bros. Melee guide. The current buttons are fairly generic, save for the C-stick stuff and the gcube/xbox specific button colors. Because they were meant to be generic, I named them as such, like Control-up.png and A-button.png. If there are to be specific images for systems, they need to be renamed.

Another problem with the current implementation is that inserting images everywhere makes the markup look horrendous, even with the Button template. Just look at the markup for Super Smash Bros. Melee/Basics to see what I mean. If possible, there should be a away to insert buttons without generic image markup, i.e. the bold tag or the link markup in wiki markup. I don't know how easy it is to put features like this into MediaWiki, but as this is a strategy guide wiki, it would be good to put directly in the code, to keep page markup easy to understand.

One more thing: is there really a need for keyboard button images, like spacebar, tab, and WASD? If this wiki had svg support, there could be away to replace the text in an svg file with a certain letter or symbol before rendering it, but its still kind of overkill.

Well, those are my thoughts on the controller buttons. the unrendered SVG ps2 buttons are still here, if anyone wants to comment on them. --blendmaster 19:05, 6 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I agree that the png buttons are ugly when littered around the page. One thing that might help is a policy to keep pages platform-agnostic when possible--say "shoot" for instance rather than "hit (triangle button image)", then refer to a rosetta page with all the controls for each platform.  Then again, melee games really do need to list the button sequence.


 * I tried making some buttons with Unicode and CSS at Talk:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Basics/Controls. I thought they looked good except for the ABXY buttons, which of course are kind of important.  DrBob pointed out that not all browsers support Unicode, and how they choose to do so is up to the browser.  That's a good point: If you saw "Hit this sequence of buttons: ? ? ? ? ?" that would be kind of frustrating!


 * Using SVG buttons would be wicked cool. The technology is only slightly less accessible than simple images -- the plugin is easily installable and has been stable since 2001.  We can use alt text in the contents of the embed element, so people who don't have/don't want SVG support can still read the page.   Even better, that alt text is HTML so we can use CSS to style that text however we want (but we should still stay way from exotic unicode glyphs).  That would give two reasonably good renditions of the page probably better looking than the current one, and preserve machine-readability. So I say go for it.


 * In terms of aesthetics, I think it's important that buttons be styled to go with the main page text. If you look at a BradyGames guide you will see that that the buttons with letters use the same font as the text, just bold.  Using different fonts tends to jar the eye a little bit. Sympleko 06:19, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I can't see any problem with the PNG buttons or the markup: once sections like that are written, they're unlikely to be changed, and so it shouldn't be much of a trouble. I'm against moving controls to disambiguation pages for each platform for each game, because that means users would have to follow another link to get to what they probably want to find, which slows everything down. I'm also against new markup for buttons, as it makes upgrading MediaWiki hell due to the hassle of porting all the modifications, then fixing the bugs.
 * I'm all for SVG images. MediaWiki will automatically rasterise them to PNG unless the user has set SVG to be displayed natively in their browser, so that's OK. Using the same font as the text is fine, as it's all the same anyway (and anybody who decides to make another header template containing a custom, stylised page title will be shot). I agree that the control images should be differentiated by platform and renamed; they're not widely used yet anyway, so it won't be much of a hassle to rename them all. --DrBob (Talk) 09:18, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I'm in full agreement with DrBob. I think SVG images would be a neat idea, but I don't see much of a problem with the current PNG images.  I also think that controls need to be game specific and named as such in order to create a consistent convention for when new game systems come out.  In the case of Playstation and Playstation 2 (and a few others), an exception can be made because it is the same controller (except for the addition of the analogs).--Dukeruckley 09:50, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * If nobody else objects, this should go ahead. Dukeruckley, do you want to handle it? :-) --DrBob (Talk) 10:16, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Personally I'd prefer typing in somthing like .:left-smash:. (embedded) instead of [[Image:Gamecube-Control-Left-Smash.png||left]]  (generic), but since I'm not a great coder, I can't have much say in whether an embedded button markup is implemented or not. On SVG vs. PNG, svg images are a lot smaller(in file size), and are better at scaling to different sizes, if say the main control page had big button images, and all other pages had smaller button images. On using the same font as the text, I convert all the text in my buttons to paths, just because different SVG renderers use different default fonts, which makes the buttons look worse.
 * One thing no one talked about was the keyboard button images. Are they really neccessary? Well, I guess I'll get started on xbox and other console buttons. I'll can upload the gamecube and ps* buttons whenever the naming scheme is set. --blendmaster 16:30, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * I've said already that custom wikimarkup for buttons is not feasible. It makes MediaWiki upgrades a real pain. Honestly. Keyboard images would look nice, and make pages look interesting, but they wouldn't really add much. I'm sitting on the fence about them, really. As for the naming scheme, just use the initials of the system (e.g. "GC", "PS", "DC", "GB", etc.), then an underscore, then the name of the button/stick movement: e.g. "gc_a.png". Make sure to put them in the controller buttons category. --DrBob (Talk) 17:09, 7 July 2006 (PDT)


 * Well, then, now I just have to wait for SVG support in this wiki, as SVG is still a "not a recommended format". I do have another idea for naming the buttons. If they were named fairly verbosely, as in Gamecube-Control-Left.svg instead of gc_left.svg, but there was a template called then you could add buttons to a page with somthing like  or PS X, while the button images have nicer names. --blendmaster 13:31, 8 July 2006 (PDT)


 * For the disambiguation of controls on a single per-guide page, I still think that following another link when you don't know the button attached to the verb (people reading the guide will have at least had some experience with the game on their platform already) is less frustrating than having to translate button names from one platform to another. And as pages grow organically, you definitely don't want button names from different platforms on the same page.  So to keep the guides clean it seems like the choices are to either list all the platform controls wherever one of them appears (as in "hit A, or ×, or NUM0, or...") or aim to keep them all in one place.  Maybe policy is too strong, but it sounds like a good guideline to me. Sympleko 09:18, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * What some guides are doing (which is good) is to have subheadings for each system on the controls page, and listing the system-specific buttons that way. However, for games with too many controls (or fighting games with many hundreds of different moves attached to combinations of buttons), the best way to do it would be to list alternatives for different systems in-situ. --DrBob (Talk) 11:38, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree on both. I think Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Basics/Controls and Super Smash Bros. Melee/Basics are good practice, each for their type of game. Sympleko 12:04, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Okay, now that png support is back up, I can upload the now finished gamecube and ps* control icons. They are named Gamecube- - .png and Playstation- - .png.The directions are in camelcase with Up and Down first and then Left or Right. por exemplo: Gamecube-Control-DownRight.png. The reason everything starts with a capital, is due to a wierd error I found with the existing Template:Button. If you specify a value as just "left" or "right", it will take that as an float argument, like an image, so if I tried to get an image for Control-right.png, specified like it would automatically float it right. So, my plan this time, is to make templates gc and psx for the gamecube and ps* buttons. The arguments would be for button name/direction and type of name/direction. But, there will be a qif argument for the type of name, so you specify a button just like  and a direction like , but you wouldn't need to type.
 * Well, I need to upload them now. I'll start with the gamecube ones and do the ps* ones later. they are all 24x24px, which I found is a happy medium between fitting in with the text and being pretty. I will also make the gc and psx templates. Admins, don't delete the old generic buttons and the button template yet, because then Super Smash Bros. Melee/Basics will break. xbox and n64 buttons are next. --blendmaster 14:02, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Super Smash Bros. Melee/Basics has been migrated. Looks pretty cool, huh? --blendmaster 17:39, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Schweet. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 17:54, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Awesome, now just give me the PS control images for Biohazard and I'll be twice as happy. :p --Antaios 18:54, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * w00t. --blendmaster 11:46, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks, blendmaster!. Looking forward to the xbox ones. Sympleko 12:50, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Looks great mate, keep it up! :) --Antaios 12:48, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Awesome job blend. Just out of curiosity, would you have any plans to do icons for a generic arcade joystick?  (You know, black stick, red top... something along those lines.)  I could really use those for games like Street Fighter II.  And I uploaded the [[Image:Punch.gif]] and [[Image:Kick.gif]] icons that Capcom used, but they're pretty low quality and could probably use replacement as well... (shoot, forgot to sign) Procyon 20:43, 25 July 2006 (CDT)

Is what we're writing here going to stay?
Should we bother updating SW while it's being moved? Are things recorded at the temporary location going to make it onto the new server? (Or are we already on the new server, just under an assumed name?) Sympleko 11:28, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * This is the new server, but as noted on the old server, there are some inconsistencies in the copy, thus there is the distinct possibility of everything having to be overwritten. What I would say is that if you want to do some editing, download the source of the article you want to edit, save it as a text file and edit it on your home computer. Once we've got everything sorted and give the go-ahead, feel free to upload it. :-) Personally, the only edits I'm doing at the moment are to test my bot; such edits can easily be re-done if we have to scrap the data. --DrBob (Talk) 11:34, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yes, actually. I think this is going to stay. :)  ech elon  04:04, 10 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yep! I'm positive. Everyone can get back to work. I'll have SQL dump files for everyone tomorrow! :)  ech elon  04:59, 10 July 2006 (CDT)


 * So will the address be changed back to www.strategywiki.net soon? --blendmaster 11:24, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I don't know what's going on. Technically I've already changed the name servers to point to the new server, yet it's still resolving to Dreamhost. It's been 48 hours since I've done so as well. I'm beginning to suspect that Dreamhost has put in place a long TTL period, and this in turn has resulting in ISPs caching where the domain resolves to. If so, that's really quite the dirty trick... Try http://dnsstuff.com yourself and you'll see everything is properly resolving there.  ech elon  14:14, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Actually, it was my mistake. And a stupid one too. I misspelled 'strategywiki.net' in BIND. At least I hope this is the problem, because if it's really the former then we've got trouble. :(  ech elon  14:26, 11 July 2006 (CDT)

Backups
This will be the StrategyWiki backup server address. Currently it contains in the folder "before-move" an XML dump of all revisions prior to our move and a tar.bz2 of all the uploaded images from the same time period. Soon I'll upload an bz2 archive of an SQL dump, and we'll host one for every month. Don't abuse this though, because we don't want to waste bandwidth. (You don't all have to download it today!) If someone wants to start a torrent or something, that may be a good idea.  ech elon  11:29, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Alternate-language versions of StrategyWiki
I've talked with DrBob about setting up alternate language versions of StrategyWiki, so sometime after we relicense I may create ja.strategywiki.net and en.strategywiki.net. I know a bit of Japanese, so I can probably set that up on my own, but would any of you like to start other language versions? I'd like to link the member database between each version so you can sign in with a single account.  ech elon  11:31, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * This would be nice, but as I've said before, I'm not good enough with foreign languages yet to consider doing anything other than English. I'd advise we look at how Wikipedia has implemented multi-language stuff to see if we can do it any better. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 12:54, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Importing Images from Wikipedia: Licensing, Technology
I'd love to get some screenshots from GTA:SA, but it appears the best (only?) way to get screenshots is from a PC game, and I only have the XBox version. I was thinking about importing those posted to Wikipedia.

At first I thought my only "issue" was one of technology; see below. But then I started reading more about the licensing, and it appears that Wikipedia content can't be imported into StrategyWiki. Is that right?

But the screenshots in question aren't owned by Wikipedia, so Wikipedia can't a apply a license to them, can they? The individual image pages indicate that the image is copywritten but they have a case for fair use. We would have the same case, I'd think.

As for the technology...may I create a bot with pywikipedia to automate the uploads? I'm also planning on importing some auto-generated content from the cfg files (vehicle data), so using a bot would be nice. Sympleko 13:12, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * We can import content from Wikipedia as we are technically still GFDL licensed. (I'm considering writing an "Open Media License" as a more broad license alternative to "StrategyWiki Public License".) As for screenshots, I don't think Wikipedia can put those under a license at all since they are fair use. There is nothing "original" in a screenshot unless it is somehow of extrodinary merit (some task that can't normally be accomplished or something). As for using a bot, feel free! Bots are great! :) Let me know when you get it finished, and I'll mark it as a bot.  ech elon  14:58, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * IANAL but that was the way I saw it, so I'm glad you agree. What about screenshots from other sites?  It seems the same reasoning applies: just because somebody snapped a screenshot and uploaded it doesn't mean they "own" it; the producing company owns it and we can use it as much as the snapper can) to screenshots posted on other web sites.   OTOH it would probably be impolite to do so without permission at least. Sympleko 06:12, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yeah, get permission, and make sure there are no watermarks. Watermarks make us look bad, kiddies. :-P --DrBob (Talk) 10:54, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I created the bot account, although I haven't done anything with it, yet. His name is SymplekoBot (yeah, I know, creative). Sympleko 05:30, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Please make sure the bot waits 5 seconds or more between uploads, so as not to overload the server. If you have the time, could you also make it stop if it senses changes to its talk page? I think some rules on bots are in order... --DrBob (Talk) 10:44, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


 * You know, Apache went on the fritz yesterday. I was thinking it might've been an attack of some sort, but it might've been SymplekoBot! Please do place limits on how fast any bots access the server. If they work too fast they will crash Apache, and since I'm not around all the time I won't always be here to reset it. (as it is I don't have any cron jobs set up to run an apache -k restart or something.) :P  ech elon  10:37, 15 July 2006 (CDT)


 * If it was SymplekoBot I absolutely apologize. I was playing with it on Friday the 14th.  But I hadn't actually succeeded in getting a single change committed (*), let alone programming a massive job.  Any access by SymplekoBot was of the debugging nature, intiated by me, one request at at time on the command line.  So I hope it wasn't me.  Pywikipedia does have some safeguards built in to throttle the speed of access.  So if/when it ever works I'll make sure to take it slow. Sympleko 15:19, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * (*) On the subject of my errors, I had some strange ones. It seemed like GET requests to retrieve the editing form for a page were handled just fine but POST requests to commit an edit were returned 404 Not Found.  The path in each case was the same, only the request method and parameters changed.  Does the server's error log show anything about that?


 * On the subject of GTA:SA vehicles, I have the PC version and would be glad to take screenshots. Is the style used on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:GTASA_PC_vehicles_Bullet.jpg) good? -- DrV


 * I think it would be better to have two separate images for the two different views, and then arrange them on the page as appropriate. --DrBob (Talk) 13:09, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yay! I agree with DrBob.  Give them a consistent file name and categorize them as...what? Category:Grand Theft Auto Vehicles? Sympleko 15:19, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I'd go with Category:Grand Theft Auto images and then make sure you include GTA_SA or GTA_VC etc in each image name. That way, all GTA images can be placed in one category.  Another option would be to make a category for GTA:SA images specific.  I wouldn't go as specific as GTA vehicles though (although there are a lot, so an argument could be made to do that).  What does everyone else think?-- Duke  Ruckley  15:26, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * The current guidelines are to create a "Gamename images" category, and then add other categories to the individual images as appropriate. So a vehicle, for example would be in "Gamename images", "Items" and "Models". I don't think things need to get any more specific than that &mdash; people are hardly going to be browsing the images regularly. --DrBob (Talk) 16:02, 17 July 2006 (CDT)

Guide organization
Something I alluded to above...I'd like to add a lot of small pages to the GTA guide. Like, a page for every vehicle, lots of location pages, lots of weapon pages, etc. The page could have some statistics about the thing (like in the case of a car, how fast it goes), where it can be found, what it's good for, what if anything IRL it's based for, etc.

It seems like this format, rather than a small set of long pages, is a little more flexible and conducive to expansion. For instance, if you had trouble finding the pilot's entrance to the airport in Los Santos, and once you found it you wanted to add it to SW, where would you put it? There are no missions which start at LSX, so it doesn't fit on any page under Missions/. It should go on a page about the airport. Likewise, any page that mentions the Jetpack or the Tank should link to a page that details how to get it.

Another thing I was wondering about were the directories in SW URLs. Should we continue to put new pages in a directory below the game name? Some of the pages I'm thinking about creating don't have an existing directory to put them in, so I have to think about where they should "go." If I create new directories, I have to think about updating the navigation template and adding a TOC page. On the other hand, I could just leave all the new articles in the top level, categorize them, and then the category page is the TOC page. If you want an article about a mission and a vehicle with the same name, you can use parentheses after, like they do on Wikipedia.

This kind of organiziation would make the guide read less like a book and more like an encyclopedia. But the nonlinear nature of the game and its illusions of an alternate world seem suited to this structure. I talked a little with Duckruckley about these ideas, and he suggested I bring them up here. I wrote a post but forgot to save it, then the server move...anyway, here it is. Does it make sense? Is it a good idea? Sympleko 13:12, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Always use sub-pages. It's one of our golden rules. Personally, I'd put (for example) all missions as sub-pages of the Missions sub-page of the GTA guide, and all cars as sub-pages of the Cars sub-page of the GTA guide. Another rule is that no sub-pages are categorised, unless for maintenance purposes (e.g. WIP using the wip template). They should be listed in the ToC, but not categorised. This keeps all the games nice and self-contained. --DrBob (Talk) 13:26, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * The only time I don't recommend a new subpage is when there isn't enough pertinent information to constitute a full page of its own. For example, the Secret of Mana Bestiary.  Instead of having a page for each individual enemy (as was originally planned) it is organized so that about eight to ten monsters are on each page.  That way there isn't a page with just seven or eight lines of information that looks very empty.  Otherwise, subpages all the way.  And I love how you called me "Duckruckley", made me laugh :).-- Duke  Ruckley  13:34, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * OK, it's good to know the rules. I'll use subpages.


 * Sorry, Duck. Slip of the keyboard, you know. :-)  Sympleko 14:01, 12 July 2006 (CDT)

Problem uploading png files?
I have tried to upload several different PNG files, but everytime I try, I get "The file is corrupt or has an incorrect extension. Please check the file and upload again." Many of these PNG files was saved directly from another site in the PNG format, and some were even manipulated and saved as PNGs by me personally (using GIMP 2.2) so I have no reason to believe that every single one is corrupt. Are there any issues with PNGs? Thanks. Procyon 13:24, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Shouldn't be. Does your internet have connectivity problems? What browser are you using? --DrBob (Talk) 13:27, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * No connectivity problems that I'm aware of, I was able to upload JPGs and GIFs with no problem. I'm using Firefox 1.5.0.4, which I have used to successfully upload PNGs in the past. Procyon 13:43, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Same here, with firefox, and gimp2.2/inkscape. --blendmaster 13:45, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * If by "same here" you mean it's broken for you too, then we need to wait for echelon. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 13:50, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * That's really odd... Did it work before we changed servers? I'll take a look into uploading.  ech elon  15:07, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yup. Checkout my image uploads @ 23:58, 5 July 2006.  4 pngs.  Procyon 17:33, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * No problem. I don't know if it's related, but there seems to be some problem converting GIFs in to thumbnails, as seen with two GIFs that I use here. Procyon 14:16, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * That's a really weird problem. Clearly the source image exists, but it can't be resized. I'll make sure the GD library is up to date.  ech elon  15:07, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I do have the problem, with all png's giving the "corrupt" error.GIFs upload fine. I'm using firefox 1.5.0.4, gimp-2.2, running on gentoo linux, but if the problem's serverside, then I don't think it matters. --blendmaster 20:03, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Would you mind saving the image to imageshack or something so that I can experiement with it?  ech elon  10:32, 15 July 2006 (CDT)


 * here it is. Its a icon for the cleanup template. --blendmaster 12:53, 15 July 2006 (CDT)

I am still unable to upload PNGs and I am sort of stalled with my contributions as a result. Should I just switch to GIF format? It does not compress as well, nor does it store as much transparency information. Please advise, thanks!Procyon 10:38, 16 July 2006 (CDT)


 * No. Just accumulate your images locally, and wait until it's been sorted out. Try and find something else to do (text to write, etc.) in the mean time, and we'll work quickly to try and resolve the problem. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 10:43, 16 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I am experiencing the same error you guys are when I attempt to upload the PNG image above. ImageMagick is installed in the appropriate place, so I'm not understanding why this is occuring. Going to try reinstalling ImageMagick from source, but I don't know how good that will do. I'm going to ask around about this error to see if someone can enlighten me.  ech elon  14:04, 16 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Failing that, you might want to log the network traffic when uploading an image and see what's happening there. You might also want to put some debug statements into MediaWiki's upload code. :-( --DrBob (Talk) 14:23, 16 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Took me a good while to debug, but it appears that MimeMagic does not contain png support out of the box for FC4/CentOS--really lame if you ask me. More info here and here. Anyway, it's fixed now! :)  ech elon  17:45, 22 July 2006 (CDT)

TOC Categorization Problems
The All Game Nav is categorizing subpages accidentally, in certain circumstances. Final Fantasy VII began to have the problem when I included the introduction on the main page. The main page is being used as the Table of Contents page, so the All Game Nav is including the categories. I think the best idea would be to always use a Table of Contents page for the All Game Nav as opposed to a title page as a convention. What does everyone else think?-- Duke Ruckley  14:55, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * To clarify, the problem is mainly that the Table of Contents pages are redirecting to the main page (which has all the categorizations). So when the All Game Nav is used on a subpage, it includes the categorization.-- Duke  Ruckley  15:06, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Yes, all All Game Navs should be referencing a stand-alone Table of Contents page; one which does not redirect to the main page. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 15:08, 13 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Alright, I think I took care of all of them...-- Duke Ruckley  15:44, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

Bad request from redirect
This page used to work but not since the transfer to the new server:

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas/Appendices/100% Completion Guide

The response is a 400 Bad Request error. The page still exists, though, at the ugly URL:

http://strategywiki.net/w/index.php?title=Grand_Theft_Auto:_San_Andreas/Appendices/100%25_Completion_Guide

What's going on? Sympleko 08:36, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


 * The server isn't configured properly with regards to the percent (%) in the URL. Wait until echelon gets here and it'll be fixed. :-) It's most likely just a simple problem with a configuration file. --DrBob (Talk) 10:46, 14 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Unfortunately, there are only two options here as to what to set as the RewriteRule, and neither of them is perfect:
 * RewriteRule ^wiki/(.*)$ /w/index.php/$1 [L,QSA] (The one we use now)
 * With this rewrite rule, the string is rewritten as path info. Ampersands can be understood, as they are not special characters. Certain characters such as the percent sign result in a bad request error. (This is how it is at Wikipedia too!)
 * RewriteRule ^wiki/?(.*)$ /w/index.php?title=$1 [L,QSA] (The one we used to use)
 * This is more of a hack job and appends the URL to the 'title' variable in the query string. When using this method, ampersands and other query string delimiters are misinterpreted entirely.
 * There's no elegant fix for this, unfortunately, and I advise sticking with the top choice.  ech elon  10:30, 15 July 2006 (CDT)


 * But it (apparently) worked before. What's the change? --DrBob (Talk) 10:44, 15 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Ampersands didn't work on the old server, actually . We were forced not to use pathinfo because Dreamhost uses Apache's mod_security. Take a careful look at what mod_security does to pathinfo, and compare that with what happens to pathinfo without mod_security (these are both my sites). Observe in particular the similar URLs and the Apache response to each; Apache will block the first request before it reaches any other modules, but the second request is actually searched for or the path rewritten with mod_rewrite.  ech elon  13:37, 16 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Actually, that might explain some of SymplekoBot's problems on Friday, because the file I was trying to upload had an ampersand in its name. The problem with the page I was writing about was a percent sign, and it definitely did work before.  Is it the same configuration nightmare for that?


 * If so, let's move the page. Right now there are only a few pages which link to it; better to move the page now than later. Sympleko 15:34, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I would say the page needs moving anyway. All guides should be for 100% completion, so this doesn't need to be explicitly stated. Aside from that, it's capitalised incorrectly. :-P I say it should be moved to "Walkthrough". --DrBob (Talk) 16:03, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * This is a little different, though. GTA games have a built-in completion counter; when you reach 100% certain features are unlocked, which is why players are so keen to reach it. However this completion counter never includes all the missions and opportunities. GarrettTalk 23:04, 17 July 2006 (CDT)


 * That's right; 100% has a special meaning to GTA players. I think the title is accurate, we just have to remove the %.  So should we move it to "100 percent completion guide"?  (DrBob: you mentioned capitalization rules.  Is this one done right? Are we following WP conventions?) Sympleko 05:25, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * How about "100 percent checklist" to keep it slightly shorter. It seems to me it is more of a list than an actual guide.-- Duke  Ruckley  08:00, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree with Dukeruckley. (Capitalisation: First word and any proper nouns have capital first letters, the others don't.) --DrBob (Talk) 11:02, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * OK, I moved the page and fixed the links. Sympleko 12:11, 18 July 2006 (CDT)

Needinfobox and Needcat templates
I have created two templates that should be helpful (if not now, then later definitely). The needinfobox template adds a notice similar to "wikify" that asks the user to add an infobox to the article (it should only be placed on the main game page). It also includes the article in a category called Category:Pages needing infobox The needcat template adds a notice similar to "stub" (in order to be smaller) asking the user to categorize the game and adds the article to a category called Category:Need category

The more important template is probably needcat. There are a few games that are currently not organized in consoles/genres/series/etc. making them difficult to find without simply typing it in the search. With this template, hopefully it'll be easier to find these pages later (though we'll have to find them anyway in order to add the template).

The templates could probably use some cleaning up and I encourage anyone to do so (I'm not the most creative when it comes to template making). If you think these templates are a bad idea, we can just go ahead and get rid of them.-- Duke Ruckley  10:42, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Nice. I've changed the images, since the ones in use weren't appropriate: new images will need to be made. I've also moved the categories, and tidied them up a bit. Good idea, Dukeruckley. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 11:09, 18 July 2006 (CDT)

We've got StrategyWiki.com/.org
I've just bought StrategyWiki.com and StrategyWiki.org from the previous owner of those domains. I'm glad we've got these since it'll ensure that people looking for us will always find us. On that note, as I was talking with DrBob earlier, what would you think about locating the website on StrategyWiki.org?  ech elon 


 * Good job! I suggest we move to strategywiki.org immediately, as we are not a network! :-P --DrBob (Talk) 21:11, 21 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Definitely .org is much more ostensible than .net. =) TT1 Yeah? 21:33, 21 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Sweet. Yeah, we probably should move to .org right away, but awesome job nonetheless. :) --Antaios 22:16, 21 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I'm setting up StrategyWiki.org's nameservers as we speak, so hopefully we can have it up and working within 24 hours. :)  ech elon  00:20, 22 July 2006 (CDT)

Open Media License
I wanted to involve everyone in writing and commenting on the "Open Media License" that I am drawing up. (I think it may be a better alternative to "StrategyWiki Public License".) You can see it here. If you wouldn't mind taking a look over it, making notes of your thoughts and ideas for improvement, and even working on it, that would be excellent. I want to slim it down quite a bit so it's a small license. Once we have a more polished and refined version, I want to show it off to Debian-legal and ask for their assistance in making this thing real. We'll of course want it to conform to all of their standards, as I generally agree with Debian-legal on most licensing issues.  ech elon  01:32, 22 July 2006 (CDT)

New Namespace?
I've been thinking about the possible problems with the "game index" we have at Special:Allpages and Special:Allpages/C. Using these two search methods to find the title you are looking for is confusing, since all subpages of guides are listed first. What if we create a new namespace (hence it would be searchable) called "GameInxex" and create pages that correspond to the index pages for the guides themselves. Examples would be GameIndex:The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time and GameIndex:Half-Life. Using this method, we can create a full, easy to search index of all the titles that exist in our wiki. Thoughts? I may make a demo to see what you think.  ech elon  17:55, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Here's a demonstration. Compare with the main index.  ech elon  18:05, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
 * That would be good. I can't see any negatives to it, unless you specifically need to search for a subpage. --blendmaster 22:10, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Nice, but does it have to have such an ugly name? Why not "Game index" (similar to "User talk")? --DrBob (Talk) 01:38, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I was thinking in camel case because I'm a programmer :P If you think "Game_index" is superior asthetically to "GameIndex", I'll change it.  ech elon  01:06, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I do, because when it's displayed as text on a page, it won't have the underscore. ;-) --DrBob (Talk) 04:02, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

ImageMap Extension
I think the ImageMap Extension could be useful. However I think the coords should instead be retrieved from a normal page using the "raw" action (ala CSS/JS). This would allow diffs and the like to be used, and it would be much simpler than using the upload form and worrying about tracking down misnamed unused map files and all that. It might need tweaking later on when SVG is working, but for now I think this is the only change it needs. GarrettTalk 01:46, 23 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Looks good, but it is a MediaWiki 1.5 extension, and we're on MediaWiki 1.7, so I don't know how compatible it'll be. --DrBob (Talk) 01:49, 23 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I love the possibilities of this extension. I'll see if I can manage to get it to work with a reasonable level of compatibility.  ech elon  01:16, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

Making a series overview
I've been doing work on the Adventures of Lolo 2 (Japanese) guide and it's nearly done (98% in fact). My next planned project was to do an overview for the whole Eggerland/Lolo series which lists instructions, info on monsters, gameplay tricks, etc. I was thinking of simply creating an article called "Eggerland series", but was uncertain if that would be the way to go. I chose Eggerland as that was the original name of the games in the series. Just wondering what I should do. Also, is it acceptable to use art from the manuals? --Sivak 00:22, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Is it okay to create an overview? Absolutely! I think that's an excellent idea. But we do need some kind of disambiguation method. Perhaps Eggerland_(overview) is a good method of doing this? I am not certain. We should get lots of opinion as to what the appropriate method should be, because once we settle on a standard we'll have to stick with it. My main concern is making sure that disambiguations and overviews remain easily accessible and placed in standard locations. If we create a Zelda overview, where should it go? Zelda is taken for disambiguation purposes, and it's best not to crowd it with overview data too. Zelda_(overview)?
 * As for manual art/scans, absolutely! Fair use! :)  ech elon  01:11, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I think the best thing to do would be to create a series category (similar to Zelda) and a series page (similar to Zelda) which itself would redirect to the series category, but then put overview information on sub-pages of the series page, and link to it from both the appropriate guides, and a ToC in the series category. That'll keep it all nice and self-contained, and avoid polluting the place with all sorts of bracketed names. :-) This should also be done for series such as Nintendo's Mario (etc.) games – which share characters like there's no tomorrow – and Zelda. --DrBob (Talk) 04:05, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

What is a spoiler?
So does that mean that locations of pickups and things aren't spoilers? I'm going through the list of items and there are lots of tips like "You can find this here...." or "You get this after you complete this mission...." These all give away game information, just not parts of the story. At some point users have to accept that they're coming to this site to get game information. I'm just looking for some guidance on what's too much spoiling. Right now through my own fault there are two item pages, one without location info and one with. I guess I should merge them, but I'm debating whether a spoiler-free list is useful, too. Sympleko 12:16, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I wouldn't classify the locations of items as spoilers. What I personally would call a spoiler would be telling the ending of the plot (if it's not obvious) before the end of the walkthrough. At the end of the walkthrough (i.e. in the logical place) and if it's appropriate, telling the end of the plot would not be a spoiler. Anywhere else, however, it would. --DrBob (Talk) 16:19, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

Renaming images
Should I create a template that adds a category to images or pages that need to be renamed? I'm thinking that there shouldn't be any text that shows up on the page, just a category for maintenance purposes. There are a bunch of images that should be renamed at some point because of ambiguity and I think if we place them in a category it'll make it easier later (unless I'm missing something already there for this purpose). Images especially need it because they cannot simply be moved and renamed, they have to be re-uploaded which requires downloading the original image.-- Duke Ruckley  14:51, 24 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I was thinking of doing such a template myself actually. By all means go ahead and make one. :-) Make it include the pages in Category:Pages needing renaming. --DrBob (Talk) 16:21, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

Display bug with IE
I've been noticing this and felt I should bring it up. It seems the All game Nav template is causing it too. Anyway, if you look at a page in IE that has that template, it seems it is too wide and it causes the text under it to be sort of "cut off" by the table. Any text following the headers (the 2 equal signs on either side) is okay. I'm surprised this hasn't been addressed. --Sivak 14:18, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * "Cut off" by which table? I've just looked at Counter-Strike: Source in IE7 beta 2 and the All Game Nav is too wide, but I'm getting no other problems with it. Could you perhaps link to a screenshot (or upload one as long as you promise to have it deleted afterwards :-P )? --DrBob (Talk) 14:29, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I checked using IE6 on the Earthbound main page and I think he's talking about this: click here to see image-- Duke  Ruckley  14:54, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Ah. Are you sure this only happens on pages using All Game Nav? I'll look into it later, but it's probably a symptom of one of IE's box model problems. :-( --DrBob (Talk) 15:01, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Why can't everyone just get Firefox? :p --Antaios 14:59, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * If only. However, we do have to support everyone. :-( --DrBob (Talk) 15:01, 25 July 2006 (CDT)