User talk:RobJ1981

Welcome to StrategyWiki!
Hello RobJ1981! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the StrategyWiki Guide. If you have a question about the content on this wiki, you can check out our staff lounge page. If you want to ask questions or hang out in IRC, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the community portal talk page. Please remember to sign your name on, and only on, talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (    ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field as this helps to document all of your hard work. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! -- Prod (Talk) 14:39, 6 March 2008 (CST)
 * Unfortunately, most of us who used to be on irc all the time, can't be on nearly as much. However, this weekend we'll be having a meeting on irc (check the Calendar for details), and you are welcome to join us. -- Prod (Talk) 21:45, 6 March 2008 (CST)
 * Skizzerz and Tathar are in there the most. I try to come in whenever I'm wikiing or playing games.  Try to come as much as possible - we would really like to have more of an interactive community.  -- 23:01, 6 March 2008 (CST)
 * Thanks for the reminder. We do check it every now and then, but we try to only delete when we have to (and once the discussion is resolved).  That AOF discussion was from January, and the person never followed up.  I guess it's time to close that.  -- Prod (Talk) 17:25, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
 * Come in IRC, me and DrBob are in. -- 01:59, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

X-Men Legends collaboration
Hey Rob, I was wondering if you wanted to team up with me to write a guide for this game. I own the GameCube version and I've beaten it once before (I can't really remember my team except that I used Ice Man the most). I went ahead and created the main game page and set up the ToC. -- 01:18, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 * Well, I mean, this is pretty casual so whenever you can add something please do so - collabs go much faster because we prompt each other to clean up and correct the others' work. I'm probably not going to focus on this 100% until I feel the Mythos guide is pretty stable, and probably before the new patch comes out.  So yeah, in the next few weeks we should try and get it done.  I wish I had a TV tuner to get screenshots.  Maybe with my next PC.  I might take photos, however that usually doesn't end up too nice.  -- 01:39, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

Categories on redirects
We put the correct categories on redirects for alternate official names for a game, so that people who (for example) buy the game in Europe when the guide's written for the American name for the game can actually find the game. --DrBob (talk) 02:11, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 * As a minor note about this, you don't need to add the Games category, it's automatic (and I'd say even avoided, incase we change the way we do things). -- Prod (Talk) 21:25, 17 March 2008 (CDT)

Sega Swirl
The Sega Swirl article is a "onepage" article, meaning it's complete and all on one page (there's not enough content to subpage it), so it doesn't need subpaging. You can tell a onepage article, as the Header Nav will have the |onepage parameter passed. --DrBob (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

needinfobox
I appreciate you're trying to be helpful, but there's no need to put needinfobox on pages which have full standard infoboxen — needinfobox is meant to indicate that the page has missing data for the required fields of the infobox; not that it has missing data for the optional fields. :-) --DrBob (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
 * I'd like to add why such missing data isn't necessary - by asking a question: how do you know that there is missing data? Perhaps if you knew, you would add it.  You may think there is something missing, but what if it doesn't exist?  What if it does exist, or what if there is more than what you expect?  I guess I had more to say than just one question, but yes, a stub is a stub and the people who know or want to help will investigate to expand what we already have (or lack).  Mange tak, -- 02:44, 13 March 2008 (CDT)

Item Lists
Basically it comes down to what makes the most sense. Most of the time I try to replicate what the items look like in game - for instance the categories they exist in, etc. Also, you can separate them by type - like battle-only items, or mixed/non-battle items (and then other categories like quest/non-use items). For alphabatization, the best thing to do is to convert it to table format, use the prettytable template with the "sortable=1" parameter so that it can be sorted as the viewer wishes. In the case of the table entries, alphabatization works best if the items all have different properties, but arranging them by, say, how much they all heal by would make sense if they ALL healed, you know? Hope that helps. Also, if you want me to convert the list to tables, I'll be happy to do so (should take me just a little while to do so). -- 14:34, 14 March 2008 (CDT)

Puzzle games
Hi. I changed it to puzzle games going on the categorisation of WarioWare: Smooth Moves, and I think it's broadly an appropriate category. However, I do share your concerns, and I think it warrants further discussion, most likely leading to the creation of a new category as you suggest. Why don't you bring it up on the forums? --DrBob (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2008 (CDT)

Log in
We're having some problems with the server at the moment. If you want to continue editing, it'll continue to put your username to your edits even though it says your IP address at the top of the page. Sorry about this. --DrBob (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2008 (CDT)
 * Should be working now. :-) --DrBob (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2008 (CDT)

Completion Stages
It's up to user discretion - you can upgrade it yourself if you feel it meets the general criteria of each completion stage (see each category for more specifics). Basically it's 0 for a stub or empty guide, 1 for having subpages, 2 for starting the walkthrough, 3 for a basically completed walkthrough, 4 four a completed guide, and featured for a full guide with all the additional parts completed. -- 19:51, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
 * Guides only need peer review when someone wants to push them to stage 5, basically. Thanks for all your hard work. :-) --DrBob (talk) 02:17, 23 March 2008 (CDT)

Fighting games
Information on fighting games is arranged in two ways. 1) Each game page shows the move lists for the entire cast of that game (if possible. Sometimes size is a factor and they simply have to be broken up.) 2) Each character that belongs to a fighting game series has a character page for that series where all of the move lists for every game that he or she appears in is presented. The moves themselves are contained on a single page which is intended to be transcluded in two locations; the game page and the character page to which that list of moves applies. Procyon (Talk) 16:30, 3 April 2008 (CDT)

Date Categories
We are making changes - see http://forums.strategywiki.org/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=26162 rd has been updated to automate the display of categories, and we now display all dates for a game. -- 15:45, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

Game categories
If you want to create a mini-game category, I think it would be fine. However, I think it would be more appropriate to label the genre as the Party Game genre, as that is how most of the industry identifies games such as Mario Party, Pac-Man Fever, Raving Rabbids etc. I do have one other favor to ask. I recently spent a lot of time repositioning the move lists for many Capcom fighters. One thing I forgot to do was to move the Move Lists category off the front page and onto the moves pages that I created. If you're in the mood to help out with that, I would appreciate it. If not, no worries, I can take care of it later. I just though I'd ask. Thanks. Procyon (Talk) 14:01, 7 April 2008 (CDT)


 * If you look at Street Fighter II, it has Category:Game move lists. That was OK when the move lists were located on the same page, but I moved the move lists to Street Fighter II/Moves, and I forgot to move the category with it.  Pretty much all of the Street Fighter and Darkstalkers games have this category and I should have moved them, but I forgot to.  Eventually, all of the fighting game will be like this, but for now, it's just the Capcom games.  Thanks again.  Procyon (Talk) 14:31, 7 April 2008 (CDT)


 * P.S. Just FYI, we also have a Category:Character move lists for individual character pages.


 * Wow, I just looked at that category, and there are actually a number of pages missing it that should have had it. This includes every game in the Street Fighter II, Street Fighter Alpha, Street Fighter EX, and Street Fighter EX series.  It looks like most of the Marvel vs. Capcom games and Darkstalkers games had them correctly. Procyon (Talk) 14:33, 7 April 2008 (CDT)

Awesome, thanks again. BTW, I'd be interested in hearing about your experience with the load times for the move lists. They tend to be on the slow side for most users, but it varies from one person to the next. Let me know how quickly they came up for you. Thanks. Procyon (Talk) 14:57, 7 April 2008 (CDT)


 * Game A was released for Console X as a standalone game, Game B was released as a compilation with Game A included on Console Y. Game A gets Console X category, but not Console Y. -- Prod (Talk) 15:39, 8 April 2008 (CDT)


 * Yeah, look at Namco Museum Vol. 1 and Pac-Man for example. Pac-Man is listed for a lot of systems, but the PlayStation isn't one of them.  We only categorize a game for a system if that specific title was released for the system.  In other words, just because Pac-Man was playable on the PlayStation, does not mean that Namco released a game with the title Pac-Man for the PlayStation.  See what I mean?  However, Pac-Man was released for the Game Boy Advance (as a NES Classic) title, in addition to being included in several compilations, so the GBA should listed as a category for Pac-Man, and I just now realized it isn't :o Procyon (Talk) 15:53, 8 April 2008 (CDT)

Compilations
"Should games part of a compilation (such as Dr. Mario that was part of a Nintendo Puzzle collection)" - no. The Dr. Mario game should not be listed as such, but you can reference the compilation(s) on the Dr. Mario page to educate people anyways. I'm 80% sure that's our policy, and if you make changes, other admins will see it/correct if necessary. -- 20:08, 8 April 2008 (CDT)

Thanks
A little thank you… For categorisation and ToCiness. Hugs, DrBob (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2008 (CDT) I just wanted to say thank you for all the work you're doing on cleaning categories and ToCs up. Have a pixellated cookie. ;-) I know how boring it is, but I hope you realise how much it's appreciated. If you keep this up, and perhaps take a more active role in things like the cleanup project as a whole, you'll be well on your way to being nominated for sysop status. --DrBob (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2008 (CDT)
 * Many of us who watch Special:Recentchanges notice your work :). If you feel an article is ready to be put to cs5, nominate it and we'll see what happens. -- Prod (Talk) 16:10, 9 April 2008 (CDT)
 * Make a list of three or four stage 4 guides you think should be promoted, and even if they need some minor/cosmetic work still done to them, list them on the nomination page. We can work out what needs doing to spruce them up from there. --DrBob (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2008 (CDT)

Spore
I don't think it really matters. I would personally wait until more information's available to do the split, but if you're confident those details are not going to change, feel free to go ahead. --DrBob (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2008 (CDT)