Talk:Animal Crossing: New Leaf/Fossils

Table
I'm not sure I like the tables on this page. They are long and narrow which means lots of scrolling and lots of white space. Any thoughts on alternative layouts? --Minx (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * How about it now? I've arrange to put it in 2 column. You could also split up the second table and arrange it in 3 column instead of 2? Paco (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I think a three-column table layout (Name, Image, Price), with the two tables following each other on the page, is probably better than the current side-by-side one. If nothing else, it'd maintain more consistency with the other list pages (Fish, bugs etc.). --aniki21 (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You could even have a fourth column for Size (small/large) and combine both into the one table? --aniki21 (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The small/large thing is a bit confusing. The fossils listed as small are simply single items, while the large fossils are pieces of full creatures - usually 3 or 4 parts to make a whole dinosaur. I'm not convinced that separate tables are required at all and would be happy to return to a Name, Image, Price layout as Aniki mentioned. It would be more in-keeping with the other lists.--Minx (talk) 15:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I typically prefer a combined name/image column, as it saves horizontal space, but that's not the problem here. I edited the page to show two alternatives: Amber at the the top of the current table shows a better version of what I started. The new table I created (above the current one) goes back to the three image layout. It saves vertical whitespace, but the images have to be squished. Scrolling will be required unless you for the images to 25 or 50px. -- 18:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)