Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Project M

This should be renamed "Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Project M/Characters", as this title seems to be more consistent than the current one. John  "Soap"   MacTavish  08:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Merging
I don't recommend it. That's just gonna make the original page too big, cluttered, and almost illegible; we need room. John  "Soap"   MacTavish  23:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * If Project M is going to be handled correctly, it should be it's own subtoc, with each character getting their own page. Reason being, each character should have a moveset associated with them which may look considerably different from their original Brawl moveset.  Whether MacTavish is dedicated enough to following through on that task remains to be seen, but that's how it should be done.   Pro  cyon  00:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, I set this up. The reason I did this  is because Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl/Ganondorf_(Project_M) is an example of what a completed character page should look like.  And that's too much content for all 45 characters to be contained on one page.  It's up to MacTavish to show us whether he's up to the task of completing all the other characters.  This is either going to turn out into an incredible example of how we can support guides for community mods, or it will turn into a shit show, in which case, we'll remove Project M from the site entirely.   Pro  cyon  01:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * On second thought, yeah, maybe instead of "Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Project M/character name", it should be "Super Smash Bros. Brawl/their name (Project M)". That seems like a valid point. John   "Soap"   MacTavish  02:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The idea of gathering the characters into a subtoc was an excellent idea; I admit, having the page for the characters was too redundant and inconvenient. John   "Soap"   MacTavish  02:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * My only concern is that this layout puts it on the same level as "The Subspace Emissary". Users may start wondering why this "feature" isn't available in their version.  -- Prod (talk) 03:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)