StrategyWiki:Collaboration of the Month

 Current Collaboration of the Month

Every month, a Collaboration of the Month will be selected by using this page. Using cooperative editing, the aim of the collaboration is to complete a major task or greatly improve an article by the end of the month. A list of former collaborations can be found in the archive.

How to nominate
Anyone may nominate a collaboration. To nominate an article or task, copy the nomination template below, fill it out accordingly and then put it at the bottom of the list. Leave the   templates as they are, and they will automatically fill in the current date for you.

Copy/paste the following nomination template:

Article name

 * Nominated , .


 * Support


 * Comments
 * A description of why the article should be the Collaboration of the Month followed by — ~

Collaboration selection
Please feel free to support as many candidates as you like; any registered user may support an article. Under the Support section of a nomination, just add your signature to the bottom of the ordered list, like so:  # ~ . Additionally, you may leave a comment under the Comments section explaining why you do or do not support the nomination.

Collaboration of the Month nominations are evaluated at the end of every month. The nomination with the greatest number of supporters is chosen. In the case of a tie, the earliest nomination is chosen. Nominations will be removed after being selected.

Nominations will be kept on the page for six months from the last support. After a nomination has been removed, feel free to re-nominate it at any time.

Call of Duty: World at War

 * Nominated September, 11, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1) Johnnyauau2000 15:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Sigma 7 19:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This game has an impact for everyone who is into WW2 games but not something as brutal as this. People who owns Xbox360, PC, PS3 and Wii who are fans of this game would benefit from this as a welcome walkthrough. The greatest potential is likely the challenges and how players like to blow through the game. In short, it's a classic. --Johnnyauau2000 15:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Selecting, this is probably would receive the best updates if chosen. --Sigma 7 19:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

 * Nominated October, 31, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1) Rocky (talk · contribs) 20:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Bae  jung92  (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Due to be released in November, the prequel: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was the top selling game for 2007 and this is likely to be just as big of a hit (it already has over 2.2 million preorders). It includes new co-operative missions, a new multiplayer mode and a new matchmaking system. Overall, I feel that this would be a great game for the collaboration and could use the extra edits. --Rocky (talk · contribs) 20:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This would definitely grab people. Article seems well underway already too. Bae  jung92  (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Ninja Gaiden II

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a level 4 guide with a complete walkthrough as well as ancillary pages. The guide needs copyediting and some minor cleanup in regards to footer navs and footer nav links. The main thing it's lacking are images. This is a possible featured article candidate with a good collaboration. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a level 2 guide with a dedicated contributor (Pocari). The guide could use headings in the walkthrough pages, fleshing out of the expansion packs and any charts or data available for the game. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Metroid Prime Hunters

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a level 4 guide that has been in the works for a long time. It needs standardized formatting across guide pages so they're all uniform, as well as a comprehensive copyedit and images. This is a possible featured article candidate if we can find some more images and clean it up a bit. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * GTA San Andreas is still a popular game (and one of the most popular of all time), and we always have a steady stream of editors for the guide, both anonymous and registered. The guide is fairly robust, but could benefit from a standardized format across guide pages and any ideas for improving the organization as a whole. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Killing Floor

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a newish online FPS that is rapidly gaining popularity. The guide needs copyediting and images. The guide routinely pulls in a lot of traffic, and there seems to be a dearth of information on the internet, so we have a golden opportunity to capitalize right now. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Pokémon

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * These standalone, non-guide pages could be cleaned up or reorganized and some ideas are needed for elegantly sharing this information between Pokémon guides. This collaboration could also include putting together an editor information packet, either in the form of a talk page post or a message template, with relevant Pokémon-centric templates, tips and styles as a reference for Pokémon editors, old and new. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)