Talk:Pokémon/Pokédex

Our own pages?
I was thinking we should probably have our own Pokedex, but of course still link to Bulbapedia (a better source currently) from the list itself, then later from the pages themselves. I think that way strategywiki can become as good as possible (by having red links ready to be filled) but still providing a source to the readers looking for more information. -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 17:28, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I cleaned it up for you, with the red links back in while still linking to bulbapedia. I would be against having too big a pokedex, perhaps only going as far as the Shinou Pokemon pokedex.  Maintaining a list that big gets tedious and boring (check out MapleStory Monsters).  But I do agree that we at least need something, it's very relevant to a guide. -- Prod 18:31, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I think having the red links will spur on someone who is determined enough to tackle something like this. I'm not the one, but I don't think having red links (while still having the bulbapedia links) is bad at all :). -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 20:30, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Some people will just come, see a bunch of red links, add maybe a sentence here or there, and then leave, with no overall structure, or perhaps may feel that this site is incomplete. Apart from that, it introduces a lot of work, with very little benefit (the stuff is already easily accessible). -- Prod 20:43, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Good points... that make sense. Alright, I'm for just having the Bulbapedia links :). -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 21:51, 8 October 2006 (CDT)