Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 1: The First Turnabout

Episode 1: The First Turnabout
Episode 1 opens with the murder of a young woman. As the murderer stands over her body holding the murder weapon we discover that he has a plan. He will pin the murder on someone else.

Defendant
Larry Butz Larry is a highly emotional young man. Often swinging from sad to happy in a matter of seconds. A friend of Phoenix Wright and defendant in this case.

Victim
Cindy Stone A 22 year old model. She lived by herself in an apartment and had been dating Larry.

Prosecution lawyer
Winston Payne A prosecutor who used to be called "The Rookie Killer", but has since fallen from grace. You only face him in this first case.

Witness
Frank Sahwit A newspaper salesman that claims to have seen Larry kill his supermodel girlfriend.

Day one
In this first case you will spend all your time in Court Room mode. This will help you get familiar with Courtroom proceedings.

Before the trial
The day will begin with a conversation between Mia (your boss) and Larry (your friend and client). Phoenix will run through the facts of the case as far as he is aware. -The victim, Cindy Stone, was killed inside her apartment. -The accused is Larry, who was dating the victim.

At this point that is all you really know, you can check the Court Record at any time to view evidence and information about the case. Currently all you have in the Court Record is you Attorney’s Badge and the autopsy report for the victim. The report says that the victim died on 7/31 between 4pm and 5pm by blood loss due to a blunt force trauma.

In the Courtroom
Now the trial begins. The Judge express concern about how nervous you look and decided to ask a few questions to establish whether you are capable of defending your client. You must answer these correctly or the Judge will get very annoyed with you.

First question: Please state the name of the defendant in this case. Answer: Larry Butz

Second question: This is a murder trial. Tell me, what's the victim's name? Answer: Cindy Stone

Final question: Now, tell me, what was the cause of death? Answer: Hit with a blunt object

Once the Judge is happy that you are capable the proceedings will continue. Prosecutor Payne will submit the murder weapon. It is a statue of The Thinker. The statue will now be added to the Court Record and you can view it at any time.

Next, Larry will be called to the stand. Payne will inform the court that Cindy had actually dumped Larry, even though Larry believes they were still dating. He tells the court that Cindy had been away in Paris and just returned the day before the murder. Cindy’s Passport will now be added to the court record.

Payne will try to get Larry worked up (which isn’t hard). He asks Larry what he thinks of Cindy now that he is aware that she was cheating on him. Here you will get the option to stop him from answering or let him speak.

It doesn’t really matter which you choose as Larry will say whatever he wants to anyway.

He will ask if Larry was at the victims apartment that day. You will be given the choice whether to let Larry answer honestly or to stop him from answering. Again, it won’t really matter which you choose. Payne has a witness that proves Larry was at Cindy’s apartment on the day of the murder.

Sahwit's Testimony: "Witness's Account"
With witness Frank Sahwit on stand it's time for your first witness testimony. You have to point out the contradictions in his testimony. See Gameplay for more information on how to Press and Present during Courtroom mode.


 * I was going door-to-door, selling subscriptions when I saw a man fleeing an apartment.
 * I thought he must be in a hurry because he left the door half-open behind him.
 * Thinking it strange, I looked inside the apartment.
 * Then I saw her lying there... A woman... not moving... dead!
 * I quailed in fright and found myself unable to go inside.
 * I thought to call the police immediately!
 * However, the phone in her apartment wasn't working.
 * I went to a nearby park and found a public phone.
 * I remember the time exactly: It was 1:00 PM.
 * The man who ran was, without a doubt, the defendant sitting right over there.

Straight after the testimony the Judge will ask why the phone in the apartment wasn’t working. Payne informs the court that there was a blackout in the building that caused her cordless phone to stop working. He presents the Blackout Record and it is added to the Court Record. If you check the Blackout Record it states that the electricity was out for 12noon until 6pm on the day of the murder.

Cross-examination
Now it is time to cross-examine. You can press every statement without getting any penalties. You need to find the lie in his testimony and prove it is a lie by presenting evidence from the Court Record.

Press the statement where he mentions the time of the murder. Mia will tell you that this is suspicious. Look at the Autopsy Report in the Court Record. Notice anything contradictory? The victim died between 4pm and 5pm however the witness is saying he found the body at 1pm. Present the Autopsy report while his state about the time is on screen.

Congratulations. You found your first contradiction in a testimony

The witness will now have to revise his testimony and try to explain why he was so certain it was 1pm.

Sahwit's Testimony: "The Time of Discovery"

 * You see, when I found the body, I heard the time.
 * There was a voice saying the time... It was probably coming from the television.
 * Oh, but it was three hours off, wasn't it?
 * I guess the victim must have been watching a video of a taped program!
 * That's why I thought it was 1:00 PM!

Cross-examination
After this revised testimony, press his second statement. Mia will step in and say that it sounds fishy. There is no way he could have heard the television. Check the Court Record and present the Blackout Record. The television could not have been on due to the blackout.

Sahwit will testify once again to try and back out of his lies.

Sahwit's Testimony: "Hearing the Time"

 * Actually, I didn't "hear" the time... I "saw" it!
 * There was a table clock in the apartment, wasn't there!
 * Yeah, the murder weapon! The killer used it to hit the victim!
 * That must have been what I saw.

Cross-examination
You have to figure out which statement in wrong by yourself this time but it is pretty obvious. He is now saying that the murder weapon is a clock, but we already have the murder weapon, it's the statue of The Thinker. Present the statue to the court against his statement about the murder weapon.

He is sure that the statue is a clock and Payne confirms this claim. Statue will be updated in the Court Record. When the neck is tilted it says the time aloud and this is how Sahwit heard the time that day. At this point the Judge will ask you if you have any problems with the witness’ testimony. How could Sahwit know that the statue was actually a clock? We only discovered this after inspecting it a little closer and Sahwit testified that he never entered the apartment. He must be lying. Choose Yes to the Judge’s question.

Phoenix will explain this to the court. Sahwit would have needed to hold the clock in his hands to realise that it was indeed a clock, but he also said he never entered the apartment. Phoenix will be presented with two options at this point. Choose “he went into the apartment”

Phoenix then declares that Sahwit did enter the apartment and that he is the real murderer. When he hit the victim with the clock it must have said the time and that’s why he was so sure it was 1pm.

The witness gets very angry because he can’t talk his way out of it. Then he throws his toupee at Phoenix.

But it’s not that easy, the Judge wants to see some proof of your claims. You will be faced with three options. Choose "Try sounding the clock"

The clock will now say "I think the time is 8.25." but the time in the courtroom is actually 11.25. Remember there was about a 3hour gap between the time Sahwit claimed to have found the body and the time of death on the autopsy report.

Solving the case
You almost have him now, it seems he was in the apartment on the day of the murder. However, Sahwit states that you can’t prove that the clock was 3 hours slow on the day of the murder. The Judge says that without being able to prove that the clock was slow that day he’ll have to let Sahwit leave.

Mia is willing to give up just yet. She tells you to think “outside the box” Don’t try to figure out when the clock was, try to understand why the clock was slow to begin with. Choose Yes to the question.

Why would Cindy need a clock that didn’t display the correct time? Perhaps the clock was the correct time. If you remember back, Cindy was in Paris before the murder. She must have set the clock to show the correct time in that time zone. Present Cindy’s Passport to the court. This proves that the clock was 3 hours slow before and on the day of the murder.

Sit back and watch as you win the first case!

After the trial
After Larry is found Not Guilty he looks terribly sad and disappointed. He believes that Cindy didn’t really like him at. Mia tells Phoenix to prove to Larry that Cindy cared for him! Present Larry with the Clock/Statue. Cindy took this awkward clock with her on her travels and Larry made it especially for her. Cindy did still care for him.