Talk:Main Page

This page is for the discussion of the Main Page only. All issues relating to StrategyWiki itself should be discussed on the Community Issues page. To help improve the Main Page layout, visit the Work in Progress

Index
Shouldn't the mane page contain an index. As it stands I see no clear center; a nexcus, a list of all the games. What the strategy wikis goals and what it is about. Seems more likely to be an about page.
 * There are links to categories that contain the categorized guides on the main page. Right under all the goals. --Hack 19:48, 6 January 2006 (PST)

Screenshot of the day suggestion
I know it's some shameless self-publicity, but could my Image:css_cs_office_overview_general.png image be used as a screenshot of the day? I've just worked for quite a while to make it, and there isn't a screenshot of the day on the main page at the moment anyway. --DrBob 14:37, 22 May 2006 (PDT)

Links
Currently, the links to StrategyWiki:Collaboration of the Month and StrategyWiki:Promising Guide of the Month look really ugly. Basically, instead of Promising Guide of the Month have something more like Promising Guide of the Month

So? What do you think? -- RovingRoflguy
 * Done (I think). -- Prod 00:13, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Great! --RovingRoflguy 05:57, 10 October 2006 (CDT)

IRC server
irc://irc.dsmeet.com -> irc://irc.abxy.org. -- Prod 00:17, 12 October 2006 (CDT)

Bypass Redirect
check out an example of our system in action should point to The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time/The Beginning instead of a redirect. --inarius(T) 20:37, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Wording on introduction
Since people have to register in order to edit pages, the introduction text of "'The guides here can be edited by anyone, so feel free to jump in and improve something!'" seems a bit misleading. Perhaps the words "jump in and improve something" can be linked to the register page? --blendmaster 13:19, 3 July 2007 (CDT)
 * What about the exclamation mark?--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 14:36, 3 July 2007 (CDT)
 * It doesn't matter to me. --blendmaster 13:53, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

Ordering of systems
I think it would be better if the order of systems on the main page was in alphabetical order, e.g.: Systems (all systems): DS, GBA, GameCube, PC, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3, PSP, Wii, Xbox, Xbox 360 Pelago 15:15, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Done--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 15:25, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I disagree with this change. The systems were sorted by company which makes it a bit easier to navigate (always put similar things together). -- Prod (Talk) 22:24, 12 July 2007 (CDT)


 * I like it alphabetically, however Wii does NOT fit well before Xbox. Weird... --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 22:29, 12 July 2007 (CDT)

Genres location
Why not set it underneat the A-Z and statistics? That way we'll have a pyramid effect (why are they at the top anyways?). This is, of course, for when we switch to the systems in graphical form. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 19:49, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Looks good on 800x600+ resolutions, sadly the lower ones have to deal with double rows (doesn't matter the location). --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

SW is not ready to show off
The DPL list and the redesigned system browser are two very nice additions, but they reveal where StrategyWiki is lacking most (especially the system browser.) Until StrategyWiki is ready to show off, are the new additions really going to help us impress readers with more red links?--Dan 20:24, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
 * The DPL list (yay: DynamicPageList list--redundancy ftw) is listing the best that we have (aka highly complete and viewed guides). We could modify it so it only picks stuff from completion stage 4, if that's needed, however. -- 20:50, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Interesting fix, but given the number of finished guides that are actually popular, it would bear no usefulness seeing how there would be nearly no contemporary diversity and therefore does not seem necessary to be front page material. At this point a "list of 10 popular unfinished guides" and vice a versa would make more sense on the Community portal if on any front page.--Dan 23:09, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
 * But the key word is popular. To hell with their completion level, they're what people come to StrategyWiki for! I don't think 217k page views of MapleStory says "this guide is not ready to show off." -- 23:45, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Remember, we are a wiki, so even if some users aren't impressed with red links, others might see it as an opportunity to contribute or even as a promise of content to come. -- 23:45, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
 * What red links are you guys talking about? I don't see any... -- 23:55, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

Ok, I've modified the DPL to show 10 random pages from the top 50 pages in Completion Stage 2 or above (aka not 1 or 0). This will bring them to popular guides that some people may find that they could improve upon. -- 10:27, 11 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Too bad it only counts edits on the main page of the guide, is there a way to fix this or will it put too much strain on the Database.--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 12:04, 1 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Yes, there is, but there is no way to only make the guide itself show then. Besides, if you want all the edits, just use Special:Recentchanges. Most casual visitors won't care about sub-pages, anyway, which is why they aren't there. -- 12:12, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Missing icons
The logos for the Wii, Xbox, Xbox 360, and PC are missing. I tried refreshing and stuff, but I still can't see it. Baejung92 17:59, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
 * Fixed. -- Prod (Talk) 19:14, 27 October 2007 (CDT)

DPL completion levels
Does anyone object to me adding completion levels to our popular and new guide lists? It looks like this:

I think it looks pretty nice. -- 13:23, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
 * it LOOKS nice, but it makes it even more server-intensive. Perhaps after we update our server? -- 14:22, 3 November 2007 (CDT)