Talk:Animal Crossing: New Leaf/Furniture

Furniture images
I'm thinking about whether to remove the image column of these furniture tables. Of course, having images in the tables would be preferable since players will have an idea what they look like, but it could make the page way too long that we might need to separate this page into multiple subpages. So, should we keep the images or not? T.testLP(talk) 09:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I would say keep it. We could fix the size with px (pixel) to adjust the length of the images, but there are surely enough other Methods to try out to make it look good. On the other hand it seems there are really alot of Furniture. So subpages would be better, but how should it be splitted up? Paco (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Last week I started taking screenshots of the furniture I had in my catalogue. It's not looking great - the items spin around which makes it tough to get consistent pics. Could we maybe remove the image column from the table and add a gallery for each instead? Images from the catalogue and maybe a couple from in a house might be nice. As for splitting it up - I'm not sure what the best way to go about it. There are 41 series (I think). Is it possible to make the furniture page like a category page and then that could contain all the links series? Not sure what the policy on that is --Minx (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * okay, this wiki captures what I'm talking about (although now paranoid about looking like I'm ripping them off!!) http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Furniture_Series Minx (talk) 18:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * We might need a separate column or even an entire subsection of pages. Creating a gallery of furniture will make the page visually longer and less tidy, so doing so will definitely mean separating the furniture page into subpages. There are multiple groups that furniture belong in, but some furniture don't belong in any group, some overlap and overall the number of furniture in each group isn't balanced. For example, if we were to make a page about furniture in a series and another page of furniture in sets, the series page will be much longer. As for furniture screenshots, I prefer a roughly isometric view of that item instead of a front view as it displays more sides of the furniture. T.testLP(talk) 05:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * So what is the final decision? I don't want to make more tables until we've settled on a solution. Removing all the image columns will be more tedious the more tables are added beforehand. T.testLP(talk) 10:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, had a think about how I would want to use this page as a player - I think the way you have started would be good. Yes the page will be long but I can use the TOC to jump to the Series I care about and it still looks tidy and whatnot. I think images in the table are fine, although it might look a little empty while we fill them up. Having images included is what makes a wiki superior to other formats so I think we should use them whenever possible. Maybe we should have a note somewhere about standards for taking furniture pictures for this page. Or do you feel that if we get a handful of examples in, future editors can follow our lead.--Minx (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * My biggest worry is that all those images would cause the page to load very slowly, especially for readers with poorer internet connections, which is why it might be wise to split the page up. For images, clear guidelines are better than expecting other users to follow a style. T.testLP(talk) 15:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)