User talk:Minx

ACWW Flowers.jpg
Good job on correcting your mistake in naming this image, but I question the need for such an image in the first place; why not just use a table? Due to this, I've marked the image for wikification, and it will eventually be deleted, by which time, you probably will want to have tabulated the data in it. Another thing you might want to bear in mind, is that images need categorisation when they're uploaded, by adding the category references in the description. Thanks for contributing to StrategyWiki! :-) --DrBob (Talk) 07:35, 5 September 2006 (CDT)

I was shown the formatting for a table and it has now been updated. Thanks --Minx 04:48, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Image categorisation
I see you've been uploading a few images lately. When doing so, could you please make sure to categorise them using the correct image categories? The image policy is viewable here, and contains all the information you'll need to categorise future uploads. --DrBob (Talk) 10:39, 19 October 2006 (CDT)

Subpage
I've moved the Day two, and Day three to subpages. I've also changed the ToC to reflect that. It might also be better to move the main pages to Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 1: The First Turnabout and Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 2: Turnabout Sisters. -- Prod (Talk) 08:52, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Okay, sorry for causing work for you all. I'll move them to new names. Should I move the subpages to new names too? At least I have learnt something new today! :) --Minx 10:44, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Don't worry about it. I've haven't played the game so I can't help with content.  Formatting I can do so I'll take care of moving the subpages.  The guide is looking good, keep up the good work :D. -- Prod (Talk) 20:36, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

Copyvio
Thanks for pointing out that copyright violation. I'll take a better look at it later. In future, though, if you notice something which looks like a copyright violation, can you please put the copyvio template at the top of the page, and not delete the offending content? It makes investigation easier, and there's less work if the content turns out to be OK. :-) --DrBob (Talk) 12:16, 24 January 2007 (CST)

Woah, nice work on Phoenix Wright 1
Looks very promising, I'm just playing through the third game now myself.--BigCow 13:34, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Precipice
Thanks for taking care of the rename :). -- Prod (Talk) 21:32, 2 June 2008 (CDT)

Pheonix Wright deletions
Why can't the images be used? They appear for me... -- 09:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

After I uploaded them, I couldn't see them and it said "Warning: This file may contain malicious code, by executing it your system may be compromised." aniki sorted it out for me though. I have no idea what was happening. --Minx 13:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney
Hello, the Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney guide has been nominated for Featured Status. As one of the main contributors, your opinion would be very welcome! - najzere T 04:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Image categorization
It's okay, but I'm not sure about the icon category, since the actual model of the fish isn't used to represent them, and there is already alternate 2D icons when they are in your inventory. I like the idea of using a separate category for fish images, since there is more than enough images for them to warrant a subcategory. T.testLP(talk) 09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

AC:NL Walkthrough page
What do you think should be included in the walkthrough page? We can potentially cover so much with our current pages such as the financial planning page. Consulting previous AC guides doesn't help since their walkthrough pages are either mediocre or contain content that we already covered in Getting Started. Do we just use it as a sort of ToC hub/introduction page? T.testLP(talk) 09:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking about getting rid of the Walkthrough page (as an editable page) and just keep it as a column header in the TOC. I can't think what you could put for a walkthrough of this sort of game - it doesn't have a traditional storyline or structure and I agree with you about the previous AC guides. I think if we get the layout right on this one, it could be used to tidy up the others. --Minx (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting Started and Walkthrough must always be linked, so it cannot be delinked. The Walkthrough can also used as a Prolog or Instruction if you don't know what to put in. Paco (talk) 17:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * That's the best option I can think of right now. Use it to introduce players to the game and the guide (similar to the walkthrough page for PW:AA. T.testLP(talk) 09:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't realise that the walkthrough had to be linked, makes sense. If I get some time today I'll try and put something together for that page. Maybe covering the lack of linear gameplay and basic objectives like collecting, building, friendships etc --Minx (talk) 09:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've put some stuff together: Walkthrough I'll get round to adding features and whatnot as I remember about them! --Minx (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Fish, bugs and deep sea creatures table order
As of now our three wildlife collectible pages list all fish, bugs and deep sea creatures at an alphabetical order which I personally feel isn't suitable. The tables as it is is a bit...disconnected, for lack of a better word, as similar species and catching methods are often scattered around the table instead of one section. I'd like to propose arranging these creatures in the in-game encyclopedia's order, which groups creatures by species and catch location, or to create subsections for each based on catch method, such as a section for bugs found on tree trunks or a section for river fish. T.testLP(talk) 14:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what would work best. I copied the tables from the AC:WW guide for ease. My gut reaction would be to rearrange them to match how they are displayed in the encyclopaedia in game. However, the tables are all sortable, meaning you could sort by location or time of day if you wish --Minx (talk) 15:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I haven't played WW, but think about how you, a reader/gamer, would need to use this information. Is it to figure out what you have left to collect? In most cases alphabetical as the default listing is preferred. As long as the columns are standardized so when you sort you can sort it by whatever you want, then it's not a big deal. E.g. the location for catching should have generic descriptions that multiple fish match. -- 20:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case I think encyclopedia-order would work best. It lists similar species like butterflies and species with similar catch methods or rarities together. Since we can sort creature names, locations and time alphabetically using sortable tables, encyclopedia-order makes sense as it's the only order that can't be automatically sorted. Another benefit is that players can refer to their 3ds to find exactly what creature they're missing belongs in that empty slot. T.testLP(talk) 06:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)