The Great Ace Attorney: Adventures/Episode 3: The Adventure of the Runaway Room/Trial, Part 3

Emergency recess
Susato reports that a young girl trying to escape from the courtroom was captured by the bailiff. Might she be the third passenger? But the total sum of twenty pence paid to Beppo contradicts this. Just who is this girl, anyway?

Back in the courtroom, she and McGilded take the witness stand. It is revealed that the girl did indeed set off the smoke bomb, but she remains silent when questioned. Mr McGilded testifies for her to explain the situation.

The Young Girl: Cross Examination
Press on all statements.

Gina's Testimony: What the Girl Saw
When asked about the contents of the seat's cubbyhole, you can pick any option.

What the Girl Saw: Cross Examination
Press on the fifth statement, then Press on the third statement and Pursue McGilded on the line:
 * ...I ain't to 'appy in small, dark places. Feels too much like bein' thrown in the clink.

How important was Gina's testimony just now? What did she hear? When given the option, select It's profoundly important. She will append a new statement to her testimony:
 * I was strainin' me ears to work out wot was goin' on, but all I could 'ear was snorin'.

Press on this new statement. Gina really didn't hear anything else, huh? Something's off. Select It doens't add up when given the option. Something - or someone - else should have been audible to her. Show a person, then select  'Thrice-Fired' Mason's profile. Since she was first to enter the coach, she should have heard the victim boarding it!

Ryunosuke suggests a new possibility. Mason certainly was a passenger, so the only other explanation is... Select There's another entrance when prompted. You are shown the omnibus sketch again. Indicate the only other entranceway available: the skylight on the roof! It might be possible to drop down through it from above. This would explain the "loud sound" McGilded and Gina heard. However, van Zieks is quick to remind you that neither witness brought this up. Are they hiding something? The courtroom orders Fairplay and Furst to testify once more.

Refuting the Accusation: Cross Examination
Press on the third statement, then question McGilded on the line:
 * Fairplay: Neither of us have the remotest connection to the gentlemen who were in the cabin!

He will reveal how the two were connected to the crime, and thus each had motive to murder.

Next, press on the fourth statement, then question Gina on the line:
 * Furst: That skylight can't be opened! I tried and tried when I was inside that cabin of shame!

Turns out the skylight can be opened, but only from the roof.

Examine the omnibus and open the door, then the skylight. Taking a closer look at its inner frame reveals a bloodstain! Intriguing... This new evidence will be updated in the Court Record.

Present the updated Omnibus on the fifth statement, then indicate the bloodstain when prompted by the judge. Those two on the roof look pretty guilty now!

Invalid evidence?
The jury prepares to announce its verdict, when suddenly... van Zieks claims your newfound evidence to be invalid! The traces of blood were not there at the time of the investigation, so someone may have tampered with the omnibus during the trial. Choose It could have been possible when prompted, as there was in fact a small window of time this could have happened: during the smoke grenade explosion!

Enraged, Mr McGilded accuses you of being an amateurish upstart. van Zieks goes on to list other mysterious "inconsistencies" that appeared in the crime scene. When prompted, say I have an inkling then indicate the blood on the omnibus' floor. van Zieks commends you for putting the truth before your client while McGilded goes into an uproar, saying that he has no evidence that any fabrication occurred. Thus, the traces are the truth as it pertains to the court. It appears the defence will receive its victory... but is this really okay?

No matter what you plead, McGilded erupts into laughter and asserts that your words are a formality, nothing more. Since the trial cannot continue, the jury is unneeded to declare the verdict. Therefore,

Magnus McGilded is found...



as the gallery murmurs in doubt.

Aftermath
Despite the fact that the full truth behind the case wasn't revealed, Ryunosuke succeeded in completing Stronghart's test, and Susato congratulates him for a job well done. McGilded also praises Ryunosuke's performance before returning to the courtroom to inspect the crime scene. Gina is then confronted by a small girl who claims to be the inventor of the gun that Gina has repeatedly fired off in the courtroom, and the two leave Ryunosuke and Susato to wonder what their sleeping arrangements will be for the night. A scene that shows a fire in the courtroom concludes the episode, indicating that the case of "Thrice-Fired" Mason and Magnus McGilded is far from over.