StrategyWiki talk:Wikipedia Article

No mention of GameFAQS.com
I think it's really important that we severely reduce the number of references to GameFAQs.com, if not eliminate all of them entirely. Every time anything is ever mentioned about SW, there always something about GF, and I think all that's doing is giving them free publicity, as well as continuously associating ourselves as #2 even though we're trying to become #1. The obvious argument for mentioning it is that many gamers know what GF is, but do you really need to mention GF in order to explain to people that we host game guides? I'd like to see SW become more independent from the constant association to GF. Procyon 23:01, 2 February 2007 (CST)