StrategyWiki:Staff lounge

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

Welcome to all users! This page is where you can ask StrategyWiki-related questions to the staff and senior community figures, and they will do their best to answer. New issues are entered here, with the most recent at the bottom of the page. If your question does not pertain to editing StrategyWiki (e.g. asking for hints or game-specific information), please ask on the guide's talk page or on the forums.

Please review the Table of Contents to see if your issue has already been raised; also check the archives (to the right) in case it was discussed some time ago.

To facilitate ease of browsing and replying, please:
 * 1) Place your question at the bottom of the list.
 * 2) Title the question (by placing the title between equals signs: ==Title==).
 * 3) Sign your name and date (by adding four tildes: ~ ).

Backward compatibility
Currently, there is a consideration to add all platforms that a game is playable on to its infobox. This includes platforms that offer backward compatibility (for example, all PS4 games can be purchased on the PS5's digital storefront, even though those games were not made for the PS5). The question then becomes how to handle this for platforms that offer limited backward compatibility (for example, the original DS and DS Lite models could play all GBA games, but this feature was discontinued with the DSi). Any thoughts? -- Wario Talk 19:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we should cover this information, but with BC being inconsistent, we would need some kind of clarification. I think the easiest solution is a template like ps5 in the infobox, which links to the  section on the relevant system's page, which can go into how BC is supported on that system. The infobox could look something like this:
 * |systems=PlayStation 2,
 * A related question would be purpose-built backwards compatibility like Super Game Boy, which allows you to play GB games on SNES. I think it supports everything that Game Boy supports, but some games have "special features", like special borders and colour schemes. Would these count as supported systems, or BC? -- Prod (talk) 19:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Still hoping to get more feedback on this one. -- Prod (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Now with syslist, perhaps we can have bclist? -- Prod (talk) 23:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking the best course of action is probably having a  parameter in the infobox with a bcsyslist template. This way we can modify the layout in the future (either show it with the systems, or as a separate row), and we can have more unique categorization options for each system. -- Prod (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think splitting them to two groups is fine. I would not treat hardware extensions like SGB the same as I would say the Wii playing GCN games. Trig - 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

A topic that came up on discord yesterday was the situation where games were sold on new platforms, but using emulation. In particular the fact that without the category the main category is filled with irrelevant entries. My opinion is that it was a mistake to remove the category, it is needed to keep the main system category free of clutter.--Henke37 (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:Guide-specific images
The term "images" is fairly limited, as we often store all kinds of files for some games. Including videos, text, and potentially even xml files. I've created Files to standardize the contents of the sub-categories, but I feel we should update the name at the same time. Should we switch to the term "Media" or "Files". For example: Perhaps even remove the "-specific" term and simplify to Category:Guide files. MediaWiki has both Media and File namespaces. -- Prod (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Category:Diablo images -> Category:Diablo files or Category:Diablo media
 * Category:Guide-specific images -> Category:Guide-specific files or Category:Guide-specific media.
 * Files. Media generally both through mediawiki and also as a general statement generally implies audiovisual content while Files implies a broader range of all file types. I would move to Files by guide, personally, if not Guide files. It could be contrasted to a files by type or files by license organization, in a more consistent way. Trig - 06:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Interesting idea. Base category would be Category:Files by guide, with the sub-category being Category:Diablo files. -- Prod (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm in favor of losing "specific." Maybe it's just the way I've been using the site all these years, but what files do we host on this site other than images?  I haven't seen videos, text, or XML files uploaded to the site.  Perhaps I missed it?  Are there examples of such files?  How do we integrate anything other than images into guides?  I know for videos, people use the YouTube template.  I'm not clear on what problem this solves.   Pro  cyon  00:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Special:MediaStatistics gives full details, but we also have text and xml files. I'm hoping in the future we can upload data files and have mw:Extension:External Data fill in templates with the data. -- Prod (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe there are a few Mario and Luigi series videos on the site, and I have seen a good number of txt files both for the site as a whole and for supporting a few games. While I personally would prefer we steer away from txt and xml, I think there is a large case to make for video or even possibly audio files being uploaded to the site (video puzzle solutions, tough segments, audio cues, audio for musical challenges like zelda instruments or music games). Animated GIFs/animated files (apng rise up) as a whole is also a gray area of is it an image or what is it. It might not be the most pressing of issues, but I think it could be made a little more consistent with other forms of organization. Trig - 06:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I've begun the switchover to sub-categories being like Category:Diablo files. I'm still not sure about Category:Files by guide vs Category:Guide files, but we can change that easily by updating Files.
 * Using File in the descriptions will automatically add it to the correct categories, and my bot will create/delete the file categories as things get migrated over. -- Prod (talk) 00:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

short review
Dear Staff lounge, how do I write a short review to post on Strategy, I need step by step instructions from the Main page, hope you can help as I'm new to this thanks Robert.
 * Responded on Rabtherave's user talk page, but in short, we don't offer video game reviews on this site.  Pro cyon  17:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

This category should be split up into more specific categories. At least the following: Any others? -- Prod (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Local multiplayer
 * Local co-op
 * Local splitscreen multiplayer
 * Local hotseat multiplayer
 * Online multiplayer
 * Online co-op
 * MMO
 * Local splitscreen co-op, and maybe instead of "multiplayer" it should be "versus" or "PVP". Also it would be good to have a modelist template. -BrownDerby (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm still a bit concerned about the "co-op" term at all. It's really useful to know which games have a co-op mode, but a game has to have multiplayer in some form to allow it, so I'm not sure it exactly fits in with all the other options. Perhaps it should only be a single option that says "yes there is some form of multiplayer co-op".
 * Single player
 * Email multiplayer (Civilization)
 * Multiplayer (Contra)
 * Hot-seat multiplayer (Super Mario World)
 * Split-screen multiplayer (GoldenEye 007)
 * Online multiplayer
 * Massively multiplayer online
 * Co-op
 * -- Prod (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Going by this list, it looks like the "coop" designation is orthogonal to the rest. Coop describes the relationship between players, while the rest are how two players share the experience.--Henke37 (talk) 08:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Delete all
As the various rd based templates are disappearing, nothing will be categorized by the days of the year. It makes sense to delete all the day sub-categories like. This leaves the redirects, like January 1. Simplest would be to delink and delete them all. Does anyone see any potential uses for these pages otherwise? -- Prod (talk) 00:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Honestly no, these categories rarely helped unless someone wanted to know what games were released on their birthday. I did wonder if a month/year category would be interesting, but probably only for people who religiously chronogame like I do, and I have other sources for that information.  I say let 'em go.   Pro  cyon  01:07, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with the end of days. I think keep things in months as the smallest is fine. As for day pages, with the exception of April 1st which may have inter-site function (and should exclusively be used for that), games should not have listed days as links. Trig - 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Disable 2FA
Hi, I'd like to disable the two-factor authentication from my account. I lost access to the app where I saved it. Because of this, I'm unable to disable it on my own since it requires the code autogenerated by the app. I need to change my e-mail address associated with this account since I can no longer access to it either and it also requires said code. Thanks. Drulybax (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's hard to verify your identity if you've lost your email address and your 2FA device. Were you planning on making edits with this account, as you currently have none? You don't need an account to read the site, only for editing. -- Prod (talk) 19:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, I created it here as a "just in case". I do visit this site from time to time, but there could be something I'd fix or add, if necessary, although not as a recurrent editor. I do have the recovery codes, however, but these can't be used to change e-mail or disable 2FA. Drulybax (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it seems I wrote one of the recovery codes wrong or one already used and that's what made me think I couldn't. Drulybax (talk) 20:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Persona 5 Royal pages.
I was going to get started on this game but when I created a few pages, it didn't really show on the Table of Contents. I need help in creating pages and making it easy for me to work on it. Don't get the wrong idea but the Table of Contents is a little confusing and needs to be simplified a little bit since Persona 5 and Persona 5 Royal are almost the same game. And it's one of a few games that's highly recommended since it's so unique. Thank you. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 12:26, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hop onto Discord and we can figure this out together.--Henke37 (talk) 12:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It will take about a year or so to make this guide so it's no walk in a park. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * By the way, what's Discord? Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 15:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * See that "Discord Chat" link in the sidebar? Click it to start your journey! --Henke37 (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Just hope that it works. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 04:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Template formatting question
Take a look at Pokémon Colosseum/Pyrite Town. There are many instances of the template used there, which I wrote. Beneath each of the tables is what looks like a single blank paragraph between the bottom of the table and the next part of the page. I would like for this extra space to go away, but I am not quite good enough with MediaWiki syntax to diagnose this myself. If anyone could look into this, I would be much obliged. Thanks! SupremeUmanu (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Just fixed it myself. Thanks! SupremeUmanu (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

One wiki for hogwarts Legacy
Hi, I am wondering if there can be a wiki created for Hogwarts Legacy. I'm interested in creating one for the game. SeichanGrey (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll set up the main page at Hogwarts Legacy. -- Prod (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Fully gut supporting unplayable games
It does not make sense that we host coverage of games that are no longer playable in any capacity. Many of these guides were not even well completed either. I would like to nominate the deletion of all to most existing unplayable titles, and implementing a policy that would remove game that have shut down or recently become unplayable otherwise to be deleted after 1 month of its closure. Trig - 17:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)