User talk:Onderduiker

Welcome to StrategyWiki!
Hello Onderduiker! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the StrategyWiki Guide or visit the IRC channel to chat, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the forums. To keep up-to-date with the goings on of the wiki, consider adding the noticeboard to your watchlist.

Please remember to sign your name when leaving comments on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (    ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! —  Pro cyon  17:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Attributes
Great job on KOTOR/Attributes. You really revamped the page. Thank you for your work. -- 22:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Colors
Try not to add font colors, particularly where black would be suitable. We will probably remove the font tags eventually, since it is usually seen as an unnecessary addition. Also, it may look good in one skin but not another. I'm telling you this so you don't end up working really hard at making things look a certain way, because it will probably change. At least, that's been my experience here over the past couple of years. I'm also telling you this because I was into colors for a while, too, before I was disappointed by the community's stance. I hope you understand. -- 22:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem, I've already removed the font tags from the four pages to which I've contributed so far.


 * {|cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0 style="border: 1px solid dodgerblue; background: midnightblue; color:dodgerblue"


 * For future reference, would something like this be acceptable? I'll concentrate on adding content first, but my intent was to highlight text transcribed from description windows in the game itself (which look something like this).
 * }


 * Onderduiker (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * If you're attempting to mimic the game's exact presentation, that's fine, as long as it's clearly legible. While not a huge concern, it is nice to be thoughtful of any potential color combination that people with color blindness might have a hard time seeing (although, usually they can enable browser settings that minimize the issue.)  Also, you don't necessarily need to use a table cell to accomplish that.  You can also use a CSS style span.   Pro  cyon  22:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I've used Vischeck, and that particular combination is okay. Since I'm thinking of transcribing description text for attributes, feats, Force powers, items and quests, I'll most likely create and use a template at some point so that if there are any issues, they can be dealt with more quickly and easily. Onderduiker (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * If you want to try, I would use Template:kotorcolor or something game specific. -- 16:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for putting so much effort into the KOTOR guide! -- 20:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Hopefully I'll get everything including the walkthrough done by the end of next year (time and motivation permitting). Onderduiker (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Unused Images
Hello, can you check on Special:UnusedFiles if the 11 images for Kotor are needed or not. If yes, then please add them on pages where they belongs to and if not, then add "Unused" or put another Reason here. to it? Thank you for your Help. Paco (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I've now used four of those images, and the remaining seven are marked for deletion since they won't be used. Onderduiker (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your help. ^^ Paco (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Template parameters
If you want a parameter to be optional/invisible, just put (notice the pipe before the closing brackets). If you want additional formatting to be invisible (bold, a table row, etc., let me know and I will show you how to use the #if function. -- 16:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry for not responding sooner, but I've been thinking about how to proceed. I won't create any new templates or edit the existing ones yet, because I want to proceed with the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic walkthrough until I've worked out what I'm going to need them for. Most likely I'll need to complete the Search for Bastila up to the point where I must first use Awareness and Demolitions (Lower City Apartments, I think).


 * It may be a while before I get back to template design, though, as it's occurred to me that most (if not) all of the explanatory dialog could and should be moved to the relevant page in the Getting Started section (making the question a link to that page or section), and I might as well revise and complete that section (excluding Mini games) before returning to the walkthrough.


 * I can see how the #if function will be useful and I'm interested in learning how to use it, but bear with me. Onderduiker (talk) 23:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem! I am just watching your progress. To flesh out walkthroughs, just use the default style of sidebar for any important/optional notes. Great work by the way. -- 18:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Game naming
Wikipedia isn't always the best location for finding the right name for a guide. They tend to follow their own naming conventions and it's not always the same as the name proposed by the developers/publishers. The general guideline we follow is "find what the developers intended, and go with that name." This is sometimes different from Wikipedia. Some of these major guide renames, I have a bot that can handle lots of the parts, so please let me know where you think this guide should finally end up. -- Prod (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I added a colon after Star Wars because its predecessor was Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and its successor (?) is Star Wars: The Old Republic (and this seems to be common practice with Star Wars games more generally); I replaced the later colon with a dash because I'm not sure there can be more than one colon in a title, and when I look at the program under All Programs on my Start bar, it's titled Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II - The Sith Lords (colon(s?) omitted since this is an invalid character for a file name).


 * Obsidian Entertainment is inconclusive: STAR WARS®: Knights of the Old Republic™ II - The Sith Lords is how it's named in the front page announcement that it's now on Steam, whereas the Games drop down menu and subsequent forum use Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords. The manual uses  Star Wars® Knights of the Old Republic® II: The Sith Lords, but bold and italics can't be specified for wiki page titles.


 * I'm inclined to keep it as Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II - The Sith Lords, not least because I've already renamed the other pages and links. It could be shortened to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II, but it's commonly referred to by the abbreviation TSL and The Sith Lords is on the box artwork and in the manual (among other things). -- Onderduiker (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * This page seems to have the names of lots of the games as stated by LucasArts, and they don't seem to be that consistent between games ("Star Wars® Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords"). Here's Obsidian's page near the bottom states "Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords".  I've seen a few games with multiple colons.  I don't know if there's a style issue with multiple colons one way or the other, but we should stick to what the developers say.  Personally, I think Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords is the most commonly used title, and seems to be what they intended for the name. I can take care of cleaning up the names, links, and categories, as I have a few scripts that help with that.  I just want to make sure we agree first.
 * On a separate style note, all titles are supposed to be italics, and we could make the headings italics just for the title. However, I think that would just look awkward, and be much harder to maintain across the whole site. -- Prod (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * More generally there's inconsistent use of multiple colons, colons and dashes, and possibly omitted colons in Star Wars titles, but I agree that for this particular game the most common and official title appears to be Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic: The Sith Lords. Apologies for creating extra work (particularly since this was the old title), but it's better this gets sorted out now rather than after I've started creating more pages while adding content. -- Onderduiker (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Torchlight
Hi Onderduiker! I'm glad you put Torchlight in your sights. I really enjoyed that game and Runic Games is one of my favorite gaming companies (I got to meet the development team once), so I hope that you can help put the final touches on the guide. It could really use some good Destroyer, Vanquisher, and a new Alchemist build, but I'm not asking for anything really. I just wanted to reach out to you to let you know I am rooting for you (I know you will improve it)! Ahah. -- 06:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the encouragement! Although I've already completed Torchlight by muddling through with all three classes on Normal, I won't consider it finished until I've done so on Very Hard with the minimum number of characters required to maximize the skills and spells used: I expect that to be at least three per class, focusing on different skill trees, weapon configurations, attributes and so on. As such I've been familiarizing myself with the console and TorchEd so I can investigate how things work, as well as gathering information from other sources before proceeding with both the game and this wiki.


 * However, in terms of my priorities Torchlight comes behind Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and a Diablo II wiki to which I also contribute, so I'm unlikely to do anything significant unless I finish or feel like taking a break from those two. Admittedly I've already played Diablo II to death so that's the one that least motivates me (that wiki's in danger of becoming a personal example of the sunk cost fallacy) and it's another ARPG (so it could make sense to alternate), but I'm planning to play through KotOR 2-4 times (all combinations of alignment and sex, although two may suffice for walkthrough purposes). Onderduiker (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm a big fan of D2, too. I played it a lot, but was never the best at it (my two highest characters were like 76 and 81). I used to use bnet's arreat summit pages for their weapon database all the time. Were you working at http://diablo2.diablowiki.net/Main_Page ? -- 20:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I've made a few contributions to that wiki, but for the past few years I've been working (albeit more and more sporadically) on the Diablo II section of the Amazon Basin wiki. Onderduiker (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Reorganization
One thing I'm considering with Torchlight is creating separate pages for each skill tree (added detail and screenshots may make the class pages excessively long otherwise), then adding core build outlines to the class pages (for example, caster (Arcane), summoner (Lore) and fighter (Battle) builds for the Alchemist) rather than having separate Builds pages. However, I've noticed Diablo II also has Class and Builds pages, so I was wondering if doing so would be counter to any established format for ARPGs. Onderduiker (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No, we don't have a precedent here. Sub-pages sound good. Just put them in the table of contents under a heading (I can help with that). -- 18:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * So this is what I have in mind. I'd probably create a fourth ToC column just for Classes, and the builds pages would be deleted after their current content was cut and pasted to the class pages (and subject to expansion and revision at a later date).


 * Alternatively, is there a way to merge the class and builds pages, or at least their histories (depending on how important it is to keep records of who contributed what)? Onderduiker (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * It is possible to merge histories, but a lot of work. I can just move the builds page to the first skill tree section and then if you move any content to the other sections you just say "sub-paged to " in the summary. -- 05:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * That's a much better idea, and I can move pages myself (and flag resulting redirects for deletion once nothing links). I'll return to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic from tomorrow (I'll complete Jedi training on Dantooine before working out templates and revising existing pages), but I can reorganize Torchlight tonight and do bits and pieces when I take a break from other projects. Thanks! Onderduiker (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Image naming
Looking at Torchlight images, there are 67 images prefixed TL (all Achievements) and another 18 prefixed Torchlight (and one template): should one set be renamed for consistency, or isn't this an issue as long as they're properly categorized? For future uploads (and templates), should TL or Torchlight be used? Given that there's now Torchlight II, TL and TL2 could be used (again, I'm assuming any other games abbreviated to TL wouldn't be an issue as long as they're properly categorized).

Incidentally, is there any reason why there's both an Achievements page and an Obtaining achievements page? If not, I'll 'merge' them (move one to create the Quests page to preserve its history, then cut and paste content). Onderduiker (talk) 17:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Filename patterns do not need to be unified except for those used with templates (and templates can be customized to be inclusive of more than one filename pattern). At this point, I don't think that applies to any of the torchlight images. Our image name policy can be found here. -- 17:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * In the future I'll prefix all images and templates with TL, and rename existing ones when I next edit any page which uses them. I'll be doing some reorganizing of the Table of Contents and 'merging' and renaming some pages over the next few days, but once I've established the framework for future work I probably won't do any significant work on this guide for a while. Thanks! Onderduiker (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * That's ok. It is pretty good in its current form. Not 100% complete, but usable. Plus, the game is pretty easy so a guide isn't really in demand. Remember to mark redirected moved pages for deletion, or uncheck the box to leave a redirect when moving a subpage, as we do not allow sub-page redirects. Also, since the builds pages no longer exist, don't you think they should be re-added? Or, a builds section added to each class page? -- 19:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I remember seeing Torchlight in the Most Popular or Most Wanted list on the Main Page a while back; however, since Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic is currently 9. on the Most Wanted list, I'll be focusing on that for the foreseeable future (I've compiled all remaining Taris pages except the last, Davik's Estate, I just need to get them formatted and uploaded).


 * You and Paco have already deleted the redirects created by my recent moves bar the most recent, Obtaining achievements, which I've just moved to Achievements ; thanks to both of you, and I'll edit the Achievements page and check links before leaving Torchlight alone, for now.


 * The class pages each have a Builds section already, containing all content cut and pasted from the defunct builds pages (check histories of the Arcane, Berserker and Marksman pages to verify). They could certainly stand to be expanded, but nothing's been lost. Onderduiker (talk) 22:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

KOTOR/Skills diff review
Can you take a look at this diff, and the one before it, and confirm that it is correct or an acceptable change? Thanks. -- 16:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The formulae have been expressed differently rather than corrected by those edits. However, the additional character generation formulae would only apply to mods, and where necessary to clarify I've added square brackets to indicate rounding down, and round ones to indicate order of operations (previously I indicated this by lack of spaces, so for example at level 20, [level+3 / 2] = [23/2] = 11, whereas [20+3] / 2 = 11.5 and [level + 3/2] = [20+1.5] = 21). The changes to the level up formulae make it clear that they share a common factor with those at character generation, which is actually better. Onderduiker (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)