Template talk:Header Nav

Changes
Using the dynamic nav, I think I made this look MUCH better and much easier to deal with. This should function on Monobook, and Bluecloud, I'll also port this to the other skins. This will work very easily, and very cleanly for every guide and will allow every person to get exactly what they want on each page. But if you want more you can easily get it. What does everyone think? -- Mason11987 (Talk - Contributions) 22:52, 26 June 2006 (PDT)

"Table of Contents" and "Show" links are confusing
I think the table of contents expander (the "show" link) should be moved to the "table of contents" link itself, so long as it is readily apparant what that link does. (Maybe give it an up/down arrow?) The link to the table of contents article itself could be presented once the menu is expanded, as it is otherwise generally redundant and confusing to have in the main bar itself. Do you guys agree?  ech elon  02:22, 7 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I've got this written down on my todo list, but it's not easy, and MediaWiki won't allow the use of HTML  tags, whilst normal MediaWiki links (both types) don't have flexible enough syntax to deal with it. --DrBob (Talk) 05:30, 7 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I don't know that I like that idea - what if somebody's surfing with Java disabled? I'm all for renaming the existing "Show" link to something more descriptive (maybe "Expand ToC"?), but removing it entirely mightn't be a great idea. --aniki21 07:54, 30 August 2006 (CDT)


 * When I get round to it, I'll add the Javascript to the link in such a way so that you can follow the link normally if Javascript is disabled. ;-) --DrBob (Talk) 08:22, 30 August 2006 (CDT)

Usage of custom- spelling
The text reads this at the moment:

The custom variable is for adding extra links to be always visible to the left of the walkthrough link.

Shouldn't it say to the right of the walkthrough link?

I'm not an admin so I can't change this. Can someone please help?

Thanks Rocky 12:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)
 * Taken care of, good catch :). -- Prod (Talk) 13:12, 7 February 2007 (CST)