User talk:Skizzerz/blab


 * Note: I sometimes go through and clean this page out to only include this week's and last week's puzzle discussions. Please check the page history if you wish to see older discussions.

May 30
Stean, a small village and in the Harrogate borough of North Yorkshire, England. Foppe 16:08, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Nope, mine's longer :) (you'll have to wait until next Wednesday to find out what mine is). --SkizzerzTalk - Contribs 16:12, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

I thought satin at first, but guess not, since the one above isn't longer than yours. Baejung92 19:03, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

June 6
Going clockwise from the $50: $50 -> $5 -> $10 -> $2 -> $100 -> $1 -> $25 -- Prod (Talk) 20:25, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Gee, so much for THAT puzzle. Lasted a whole 20 minutes. --SkizzerzTalk - Contribs 20:35, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Heh, the straightforward logic puzzles are easy :P Now, that previous puzzle was just evil >_> -- Prod (Talk) 20:56, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Glad you liked it! I try my hardest to make them (or get them from such random sources that there is no way one can simply get the answer via a google search) :P --SkizzerzTalk - Contribs 21:07, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

June 13
2 and a half numbers in each square, is this right?--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 14:09, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Disregard that.

Rocky kept posting while I was trying to! Hehe, anway, cut the 18 into two 10's horizontally. Then cut vertically to seperate the 1's and 0's to create a total of 7 in each section.-- Duke Ruckley  14:12, 13 June 2007 (CDT)


 * However, Rocky's is dated first on the sig time, so better luck next time :P Oh, and Rocky, don't delete that image, I need it for my archive. -- 15:03, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Actually, take that back, Dukeruckley got the right answer. The total should be "7", not "21/2". -- 15:04, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, I realised that as I had to get away :(--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 00:36, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

August 9
Well, I'm assuming you'd just fill the 2/3s cup one either by filling and pouring the 1/3 cup twice, or filling the 1/3 cup and dumping it into the 1 cup, and then filling the 1/3 cup again, dumping it into the 1 cup, and pouring the 2/3s of water from the 1 cup. For the 1/2, you fill the 1 cup up, then pour the 1 cup into the 3/4 cup until you fill it up, leaving 1/4 cup in the 1 cup. You can pour the remaining 1/4 cup into the 1/3 cup for temporary storage (assuming you properly mallocated the 1/3 cup), then you dump the 3/4 cup and fill up the 1 cup again, and pour it into the 3/4 cup until it's full. Then you have 1/4 in the 1/3 cup, and 1/4 in the 1 cup, totalling 1/2. :P Procyon (Talk) 14:05, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Too late I guess, stupid 5 minutes.

For the 2/3 cup, just full the 1/3 cup twice and pour it in.

For the 1/2 cup, fill the 1 cup, then pour 3/4 of it into the 3/4 cup. Pour the remaining 1/4 into the 1/3 cup for storage. Empty the 3/4 cup and then again, full up the 1 cup, pour 3/4 into the 3/4 cup and then pour the 1/4 that was in the 1/3 cup back into the 1 cup so you have 1/2. Empty it into the oatmeal bowl for the 1/2. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 14:10, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Yep, both right ^_^. I got the idea from a person that I was chatting with on IRC, who just had that dilemma about 20 minutes ago. Unfortunately for you, Notmyhandle, Procyon beat you to it. Better luck next time. -- 14:17, 9 August 2007 (CDT)