StrategyWiki talk:Privacy policy

A couple of style issues
This page looks mostly good to me. A couple of minor style things: I think "General Scope" should be "General scope". And the hierarchy of headings within "Details of data retention" is slightly odd, mainly in the way it appears in the ToC. Is the "General expectations" subheading needed at all? And are "Reading guides", "Editing guides" and "Discussions" supposed to be subheadings within "User contribution" or are they supposed to be at the same level as "User contribution"? --Pelago 20:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I would agree that the "General expectations" subheading appears to have little purpose, given that the only information is under further subheadings, unless there is info to be added underneath it at a later stage. As for reading, editing and discussing guides, they appear to be subheadings of "User contribution", since they are the three levels of users' contribution to the site. Moy  dow  T · C · Boxes 20:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I was confused that "reading" was classified as a user contribution, which was why I wondered if the headings were right, but that's fine if it's supposed to be like that. --Pelago 11:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Technically, viewing the website contributes monetarily to the site. However, that is definitely not what we're talking about when referring to contributions. I've made some of the minor changes you two have suggested. -- 19:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I can understand what Pelago means. Viewing pages isn't really what one would class as 'contributing' to the site. As for the rename, I agree with it. Most of the other major policies are within the Guide, so it makes sense to keep all of them in the same area. Moy  dow  T · C · Boxes 19:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)