User talk:Ukdan999

Welcome to StrategyWiki!
Hello Ukdan999! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the editing article. If you have a question about the content on this wiki, you can check out our staff lounge page. If you want to ask questions or hang out in IRC, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up in community issues. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (0-172 13:01, 29 December 2006 (CST)); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field as this helps to document all of your hard work. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference.

0-172 13:01, 29 December 2006 (CST)
 * Just a note, when you upload an image, and you realized you put the wrong category, you don't have to reupload it to change the cat (that doesn't work anywayz). Just click the edit button on the image page, and change it that way. -- Prod (Talk) 13:50, 16 January 2007 (CST)
 * The guy who uploaded those Super Mario Kart images is the guy who made them. -- Prod (Talk) 12:36, 24 February 2007 (CST)
 * Ah, sorry, my bad.--RamonSalazar 13:16, 24 February 2007 (CST)

Dotted Line
I'm not an admin or anything, but I saw your comment for the new skin, great idea, I don't like this way that much but to get rid of the line, go to My Preferences, go to skin and choose MonoBook, it makes the page look a lot more like Wikipedia and gets rid of the line, it also gets rid of the adverts (and it wrecks the way my userboxes look).--Rocky   ( Talk Contributions ) 14:47, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Editing conventions
Hi. First off I'd like to thank you for your contributions to StrategyWiki: you've started off an awful lot of guides recently. However, you're making a few small mistakes, so to save sysops like me some work, it would be best if you don't make them in future. :-) If you look at these two diffs, you'll see the cleanup I've done on two articles you started recently. I'll just highlight what you could improve in future: Anyway, I hope this clears up a few little things, and I hope you continue contributing! Thanks. --DrBob (Talk) 05:15, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Put the game's actual genre in the infobox, so soccer games should have Soccer in the infobox, rather than Sports . Additionally, there's no need to categorise games by their genre's parent; just the genre itself. (So you should only categorise by Soccer instead of by both Soccer and Sports.)
 * If a game runs on Windows, put the Windows version down (in the infobox and as a category) which was prevalent at the time of the game's release; i.e. the version of Windows for which the game was designed. So, if a game was released in 2002 (after Windows XP was released in 2001), you'd put Windows NT down in the infobox, as Windows XP is based on the NT kernel, and that's what determines compatibility. Even if a game runs on previous versions of Windows (or future ones), you only put down the version for which it was designed. :-)
 * There's no need to put down in articles, as that's automatically done when you use the infobox.
 * Make sure you categorise games by all their systems, not just the ones for which we have categories. In the case of the first diff, you forgot to categorise the game as running on the Gizmondo.
 * Please only embolden game titles in the introductory paragraph, rather than emboldening and italicising them, as shown in the second diff.

Company categories
Games that were released by Buena Vista Games should be categorized as such. It has had "mild" consensus, but you might want to bring it up on community issues. -- Prod (Talk) 20:20, 2 July 2007 (CDT)