StrategyWiki:Requests for permissions/Nominate

Is the nominee up to the task?
Ask yourself, is the person you are nominating going to fit the job of an admin? Are their comments supportive and constructive? Do other editors get along with them?

The admin at StrategyWiki are asked to uphold the policies of the site. Anyone who contributes to the improvement of the policies and knows them well may be a good candidate.

Editors that work well with other contributors, sort out conflicts through peaceful discussions, and who are overly enthusiastic about the community are also desired nominees.

Creating the nomination page
After a nomination has been made and accepted by the candidate, please add their name to the list at the bottom of Requests for adminship and then create a nomination page for the nominee at Requests for adminship/USERNAME using the following template (please replace all instances of USERNAME with their actual username):

USERNAME
User Description


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve StrategyWiki in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
 * A:


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to StrategyWiki, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:


 * General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Neutral