Talk:Star Wars: Battlefront II/Table of Contents

Names
Is the page name the official name of the level? (I'm assuming yes). I'm guessing the stuff in brackets is the location of the level. Is the location really needed? It makes the page links very long. -- Prod (Talk) 22:32, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Yes and yes. I thought the locations were necessary because most people that I know who play this game (me included, for many of the missions) know the missions only by where they take place on, rather than their actual names ("That Coruscant level" or "That one mission on Yavin", etc). Baejung92 22:48, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
 * I moved the name out of the links since it's more of an aid than the name of the page. I also moved the two non "walkthrough" links aside since they seem more like separate modes than part of the regular campaign. If there are more modes like that, they could get their own heading.  Revert if you don't like the changes. -- Prod (Talk) 17:21, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
 * The link names are fine (it looks better this way I guess), but I definitely don't think Galactic Conquest and Instant Action belong under "Appendices", since they're parts of the game that are played much more often than the actual campaign. I'll just put those two back under the walkthrough heading. Baejung92 20:37, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Would it be possible to separate them to another heading? I don't really like grouping them with the single player campaign, cause they aren't really part of it (from what I remember of the first game). -- Prod (Talk) 00:36, 20 August 2007 (CDT)

That would be OK, but what would we name it? Baejung92 22:15, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
 * You could have a "Alternate Gameplay" section, "Modes", "Better Parts of the Game" but I'd just keep it under the appendices. -- 23:08, 20 August 2007 (CDT)