StrategyWiki talk:Cleanup project/Misspellings

Counterattack
It's actually correct... see Wikipedia and Google definitions. Yes, it can also be spelled Counter attack but it should really just be one word without a space. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 10:40, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Possible Subpages
I notice that there are quite a few Pokémon spelling corrections on this page. I think in order to avoid future clutter, we should add subpages for games like this (i.e. Cleanup project/Pokémon or Cleanup project/Misspellings/Pokémon). That way we can put spelling errors for all Pokémon games in one spot and it doesn't clutter up the "everyday" words. What do you guys think?-- Duke Ruckley  11:04, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * No, I do not believe that any Pokémon should be mentioned at all here. While the words like "Pokeball" to "Poké Ball" are fine, the names themselves (and of moves and items) should not be mentioned. -- 11:56, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I can agree to that. Maybe those names that are game specific should just be moved to the respective games talk pages?-- Duke  Ruckley  12:00, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I think Duke has the best idea; that way we won't have even more pages for each game. I'll make a misspelling list template to place on talk pages. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 18:58, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Better yet, put them on the category talk pages. Such misspellings will inevitably apply to most or all of the series, and this way it all gets covered without redundant content. This would also work towards with Blendmaster's "portal" idea (albeit on a series level rather than a system one). GarrettTalk 04:10, 13 January 2008 (CST)

preventing future date confusion
Shoot, this is probably a regional difference/preference thing, but the listing looks bad if the order for months, days, and years in the dates differ randomly. Especially for the first 12 days of the month if we are looking at some older dates (Did that happen in March or on the 3rd?).

So should they be month/day/year or day/month/year? --Zaiqukaj 02:13, 13 January 2008 (CST)


 * Me and Prod (or Proc...) prefer Month/Day/Year, since the day is pretty much insignificant considering the frequency that we clean up all the pages of every search listed here. DB updated done with Day/Month/Year, so I've been using that for the past few days (sections a-d so far). -- 19:45, 13 January 2008 (CST)


 * One alternative is to eliminate ambiguity altogether by presenting the dates in the same way as release dates&mdash;October 25, 2007. This would also make it easier to spot older tasks as month names will stick out more than a bunch of numbers separated by slashes. GarrettTalk 04:05, 13 January 2008 (CST)


 * I prefer M/D/Y too. I didn't notice that clarification on the template. Garret's idea sounds perfect. The more contrast the better. It would be nice if the N/A or insanely old ones had some sort of mark showing their greater need to be updated over one fixed last week. Oooh, maybe we can get most of the spelling searches updated today (Is personally working from the bottom going up). --Zaiqukaj 04:24, 13 January 2008 (CST)