Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Interested Editors
These editors have expressed interest in working on the SSBB guide. If you are looking for extra input, suggestions, ideas, or help on anything regarding this guide, feel free to contact them on their talk page. Also, add/remove your name to this list as you please:
 * Dan - talk
 * Mason11987 - talk
 * Ryan Schmidt - talk
 * Prod - talk
 * Some_Guy_Named_Moe - talk
 * Myth - talk
 * Fierce deity link - talk
 * Cgsguy2 - talk
 * Spruce58052 - talk
 * SFOXMASTERX - talk

Bowser Jr., Ridley and Link from Windwaker confirmed for SSBB.
Many pages say that Masahiro Sakurai told in a Japanese radio show that Bowser Jr., Ridley and Cel-Shaded Link were going to appear in SSBB. He also said that the Ice Climbers, Mr. Game and Watch and Young Link won't appear in SSBB. Please tell me if that's true. User:Fierce deity link - talk
 * Probably false, started off as a rumour in a french forum (I think). Zelda is definitely in the game though .--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 03:06, 1 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Don't add anything until it's been confirmed by the developers.--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 03:06, 1 July 2007 (CDT)

Continue Nav
I moved the continue nav to below all the information about the game because it didn't make sense breaking it all up. What do you guys think about just deleting it altogether? Now that its really close to the ToC it doesn't seem to make sense to be there. It can't go back in between paragraphs because it really disrupts things there.-- Duke Ruckley  16:52, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

Confirmed Peach?
I haven't seen any confirmation that Peach is in the game. She isn't listed on the SSBB update pages. Could someone point me to the confirmation notice? Cgsguy2 16:59, 16 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Never mind, I saw her in the Subspace Emissary section. Sorry! Cgsguy2 17:03, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

Bosses
Should a Bosses page be put in? Petey Piranha and Ancient Minister have been comfirmed? --Pika Pika 21:30, 26 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Be Bold Just add a link to the Table of Contents and create it.--Rocky http://media.strategywiki.org/images/thumb/7/78/Rally-X_Rock.png/25px-Rally-X_Rock.png (Talk - Contributions) 04:50, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
 * I think the modes page should be created, which would describe adventure mode (Subspace Emissary). Subtitles under adventure mode could included bosses.  At least until there are too many to list on one page.-- Duke  Ruckley  06:06, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Final Smash Attacks
Should we make a Final Smash Attacks page??? Because the items' page will look really big, especially if there are going to be 46 characters as they say. --Fierce deity link
 * Yeah go ahead, we can have a small section on the item page about the Smash Ball and then link with Info to the Final Smash page. -- 20:07, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Ok, thanks. But one more question, how do I do the page??? --Fierce deity link
 * "Do" it? 1) Create the page.  You can either link to the page like any other link (it will be red, then go to it and click "create this page"), search for it (then click create this page) or type the name into the url (substitute the current page name for the page you want to create).  2) Fill in the info you need.  There are template buttons for a reason (those big things that say main page, guide, company, and table of contents; just click it to fill in the header and footer nav info you need).  Otherwise just look at another page for how its set up.  Then enter the content you want (copy the info from the items page, paste it, then remove the info from the items page).  Anything else?  I'm not going to create the page for you so you can get some practice in.  -- 01:00, 28 September 2007 (CDT)

Unconfirmed Information
There have been a couple of edits that added unconfirmed information to some of the pages. I have reverted them in lieu of some kind of confirmation. I'm using the Smash Bros. Dojo as my source of information. As far as I know, that's the only official source. Cgsguy2 09:01, 7 October 2007 (CDT)
 * I've putted some info based on images and videos in Smash Bros. Dojo, hope you don't mind. Fierce deity link 18:55, 8 October 2007
 * Cgsguy2, can you give us the URL of the history differences of what you removed (so we don't have to look at every single page's history ourselves)... Thanks. -- 21:15, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
 * Sure. Here's the Kirby Move List page I changed: , and here's the Fox Move List I changed: .  I've since seen the "FireFox" move in a video while looking for confirmation (and DukeRuckley has reverted it back), but I haven't seen anything for Kirby yet.
 * Fierce Diety Link, when you placed Kirby's moves, were you referring to two of the pictures on Kirby's character page on SmashDojo, or have you heard it elsewhere too? --Cgsguy2 21:36, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
 * Fire Fox can be seen in the video on this page: http://www.smashbros.com/en_us/info/info01.html -- 22:53, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
 * For the Kirby moves, I saw them in Kirby's character page in Smash Dojo. The Fox Illusion from the new video. Fierce deity link 20:29, 12 October 2007 (CDT)
 * Ok, I saw it there too after looking around for a while. Sorry about deleting those.  --Cgsguy2 21:53, 12 October 2007 (CDT)

ToC Question
I've noticed this on other guides too, but for titles in the ToC that span multiple columns, we've been centering them. I'm on a widescreen computer, which might be part of the reason, but centering these titles (see "Characters") just doesn't look good. Because the bulleted lists aren't centered, the title tends to hover over the rightmost column, leaving empty space above the left column. This empty space looks, to me, unprofessional and confusing. I think that we should left-align these titles because it looks nicer and flows better. Any thoughts? Should I bring this up in CI as a policy change?-- Duke Ruckley Talk 12:23, 11 March 2008 (CDT)


 * I agree with you Duke. I think it's on a case by case basis (i.e. there is no set policy) so I would suggest just sliding it over to the left, which is in fact what I am going to do.  Procyon (Talk) 12:40, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 * Well now it looks the same, but over the left side, so you didn't fix it - you just moved it. I suggest we make it into two columns, where the characters header is centered within 75% of the width of the the two columns (the other 25% is about the width of the white space on the right, which is unnecessary to have it centered above).  -- 22:36, 11 March 2008 (CDT)
 * The reason it looks better on the left is because it is consistent with the left-aligned columns. I'm afraid of just playing around with the percentages because of different computer resolutions.  You can try it, but I don't know how it'll look on every computer.-- Duke  Ruckley Talk 13:06, 12 March 2008 (CDT)