StrategyWiki:Collaboration of the Month

 Current Collaboration of the Month

Every month, a Collaboration of the Month will be selected at our monthly meeting by using this page. Using cooperative editing, the aim of the collaboration is to complete a major task or greatly improve an article by the end of the month. A list of former collaborations can be found in the archive.

How to nominate
Anyone may nominate a collaboration. To nominate an article or task, click this link and fill in the Article name and the Comments section.

Collaboration selection
Please feel free to support as many candidates as you like; any registered user may support an article. Under the Support section of a nomination, just add your signature to the bottom of the ordered list, like so:  # ~ . Additionally, you may leave a comment under the Comments section explaining why you do or do not support the nomination.

Collaboration of the Month nominations are evaluated at the end of every month at the StrategyWiki meeting on IRC. The nomination with the greatest number of supporters is chosen. In the case of a tie, the earliest nomination is chosen. Nominations will be removed after being selected. Nominations will be kept on the page for six months from the last support. After a nomination has been removed, feel free to re-nominate it at any time.

At the end of this month, nominations can be removed if supported before .

Call of Duty: World at War

 * Nominated September, 11, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1) Johnnyauau2000 15:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Sigma 7 19:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This game has an impact for everyone who is into WW2 games but not something as brutal as this. People who owns Xbox360, PC, PS3 and Wii who are fans of this game would benefit from this as a welcome walkthrough. The greatest potential is likely the challenges and how players like to blow through the game. In short, it's a classic. --Johnnyauau2000 15:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Selecting, this is probably would receive the best updates if chosen. --Sigma 7 19:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Ninja Gaiden II

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) -- 21:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  Pro  cyon  19:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * This is a level 4 guide with a complete walkthrough as well as ancillary pages. The guide needs copyediting and some minor cleanup in regards to footer navs and footer nav links. The main thing it's lacking are images. This is a possible featured article candidate with a good collaboration. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure how easy it would be to get images for a 360 title, but it would be nice to see this guide as a featured article. -- 21:08, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a level 2 guide with a dedicated contributor (Pocari). The guide could use headings in the walkthrough pages, fleshing out of the expansion packs and any charts or data available for the game. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Metroid Prime Hunters

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a level 4 guide that has been in the works for a long time. It needs standardized formatting across guide pages so they're all uniform, as well as a comprehensive copyedit and images. This is a possible featured article candidate if we can find some more images and clean it up a bit. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Duke  Ruckley Talk 14:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Imjon 19:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * GTA San Andreas is still a popular game (and one of the most popular of all time), and we always have a steady stream of editors for the guide, both anonymous and registered. The guide is fairly robust, but could benefit from a standardized format across guide pages and any ideas for improving the organization as a whole. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Killing Floor

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Prod (Talk) 00:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is a newish online FPS that is rapidly gaining popularity. The guide needs copyediting and images. The guide routinely pulls in a lot of traffic, and there seems to be a dearth of information on the internet, so we have a golden opportunity to capitalize right now. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Pokémon

 * Nominated November 17, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1)  najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Duke  Ruckley Talk 14:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Imjon 19:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SRTakugaIcon.png Jepjr T 00:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Sigma 7 18:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 6)  E-123Wario54 The Temple of TalkFFI black mage (8-bit).gif 18:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 7)  Moy  dow  T · C · Boxes 18:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * These standalone, non-guide pages could be cleaned up or reorganized and some ideas are needed for elegantly sharing this information between Pokémon guides. This collaboration could also include putting together an editor information packet, either in the form of a talk page post or a message template, with relevant Pokémon-centric templates, tips and styles as a reference for Pokémon editors, old and new. — najzere T 17:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * A bunch of the info seems to just be a different version of the same info that's on Bulbapedia. I think there are much better things that we can promote on the front page. -- Prod (Talk) 18:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Wario Land: Shake It!

 * Nominated December 26, 2009.


 * Support
 * 1) Chalkwriter 17:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This game has beautiful hand-drawn graphics, and with so many hidden treasures and secrets, it could do with a bit of work. Chalkwriter 17:17, 26 December 2009

Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: The Crystal Bearers

 * Nominated January 1, 2010.


 * Support
 * 1) Prod (Talk) 00:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) E-123Wario54 22:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * New FF game for the Wii that looks like it should be good. — Prod (Talk) 00:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm looking to pick this game up--this guide should get some more attention, especially as it's one of the few next-generation Final Fantasy releases so far (other than re-releases). --E-123Wario54 22:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Marvel: Ultimate Alliance

 * Nominated April 16, 2010


 * Support
 * 1) Johnnyauau2000 14:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Superheroes are getting more popular since the comic book era. This game is most prominent in bringing out the best of Marvel Comic Heroes and Villains into this game. Not to mention some of X-Men teams, Fantastic Four and even Daredevil, Elektra and Iron Man woke my interest and I think this deserve some serious article work that it deserve. The other reason is there's a rich comic book history behind those heroes. Anyway, this game is more than meets the eye. Johnnyauau2000 14:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)