From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
< Talk:EarthBound
Revision as of 22:40, 24 May 2021 by Prod (talk | contribs) (Prod moved page Talk:Earthbound/Walkthrough to Talk:EarthBound/Walkthrough without leaving a redirect)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is the point of this page since each section of the walkthrough has it's own page? I like that template with recommended levels, btw.--Dukeruckley 10:08, 28 June 2006 (PDT)

I like it as well but I think the Boss Battles part is a little too revealing.--Dan 10:57, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
Well, I was imagining it as a non-spoiler-free route summary. Just what to do in the place, as well as provide a bit more than a table of contents to the page. sort of like starmen.net's route summary but better. --blendmaster 11:35, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
When I posted my comment here a while ago, I think it was showing the exact same thing as EarthBound/The Beginning as well as part of EarthBound/Onett. I like this a lot better, where it is an explanation of what the walkthrough is.--DukeRuckley 11:46, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
Oh, it still is... I understand what it's for now, but it might be overkill. I think if we were to add a non-spoiler-free route summary, it should just be at the beginning of each seperate page. Otherwise, the spoiler-free summary would work fine. What do you think?--DukeRuckley 11:49, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
Well, maybe the spoiler free summary stuff, and the recommended levels template thing, without the boss battles. I guess that would work. Or even just a description of each section, instead of a full summary. As long as its not just a slightly expanded table of contents, anything is fine. --blendmaster 16:57, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
I'll leave it up to you, as long as it is clear what it's there for. If it's not confusing, it's probably okay :) --DukeRuckley 07:41, 14 July 2006 (CDT)