Please add comments at the bottom, much easier to find that way (or just press the '+' at the top of the screen).
Welcome to StrategyWiki![edit]
Hello Rane MstSage! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the StrategyWiki Guide or ask a sysop, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the forums. To keep up-to-date with the goings on of the wiki, consider adding the noticeboard to your watchlist.
Please remember to sign your name when leaving comments on talk pages by clicking 
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! — Procyon 14:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Auto-Toc sidebar[edit]
The Auto-Table of Contents on the sidebar is the result of a lot of custom development that we paid developers to produce. It is not available as a publicly accessible extension, primarily because it's particular to our site's specific Table of Contents structure. Procyon 14:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oh i see, well I was curious since I am using the templates for guides on my wiki, with credit given back to you guys, since you guys developed them. Thanks anyways. Rane MstSage (talk) 14:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand, you've essentially created a whole new wiki that uses most of our style and formatting, and you're the only one building it up... why not just join us and put your contributions to good use where we could really use them? I understand wanting to start a wiki and all just to understand how it's done, but the content your generating will be received by a much wider audience if you were to put it here and collaborate with the sizable population of editors that we already have. Can I convince you to bring your content here? I mean, we could appropriate it since the licenses are compatible, but what's more valuable to me is your commitment and dedication to building the guides in the first place. What do you think? Procyon 03:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have no problem bring my content here, as well. However the wiki is meant to be part of my main news site. It's been something I had planned for years and finally coming to fruition. Like I said I have no problem moving guides I make over here, as they will also have video walkthroughs pertaining to them. Once I finish my Diablo III guide on my site, I will bring it over here, as this one need updated badly. Same with WoW, SWTOR, and other main ones I am working on. If that's all right.--Rane MstSage (talk) 04:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- That would be excellent, thank you. We would greatly appreciate it, as you are right, our guides for those games are lacking at the moment. We're cool with video walkthroughs too, we have an infrequently used YouTube template for the site. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Procyon 04:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- The only other thing that I noticed is with achievement's template, is there is nothing per say for PC wether it's steam achievements or Battle.net. I am thinking of modifying it on my site and then I will let you see it, to see if you want to apply it over here. Though there may need slight modifications since you guys do have a few extensions custom for here that I don't have. Oh btw the main site is MstSage.com I am working on how I want to add link backs on the main site etc. still but you get the gyst.--Rane MstSage (talk) 05:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Blizzard games and Steam games are always exclusive from each others' online services, so the achievement distinction is not necessary. I.e. It is assumed players know that when they play StarCraft/2 it is only available through Battle Net/their new unnamed platform. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 17:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- The only other thing that I noticed is with achievement's template, is there is nothing per say for PC wether it's steam achievements or Battle.net. I am thinking of modifying it on my site and then I will let you see it, to see if you want to apply it over here. Though there may need slight modifications since you guys do have a few extensions custom for here that I don't have. Oh btw the main site is MstSage.com I am working on how I want to add link backs on the main site etc. still but you get the gyst.--Rane MstSage (talk) 05:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- That would be excellent, thank you. We would greatly appreciate it, as you are right, our guides for those games are lacking at the moment. We're cool with video walkthroughs too, we have an infrequently used YouTube template for the site. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Procyon 04:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have no problem bring my content here, as well. However the wiki is meant to be part of my main news site. It's been something I had planned for years and finally coming to fruition. Like I said I have no problem moving guides I make over here, as they will also have video walkthroughs pertaining to them. Once I finish my Diablo III guide on my site, I will bring it over here, as this one need updated badly. Same with WoW, SWTOR, and other main ones I am working on. If that's all right.--Rane MstSage (talk) 04:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand, you've essentially created a whole new wiki that uses most of our style and formatting, and you're the only one building it up... why not just join us and put your contributions to good use where we could really use them? I understand wanting to start a wiki and all just to understand how it's done, but the content your generating will be received by a much wider audience if you were to put it here and collaborate with the sizable population of editors that we already have. Can I convince you to bring your content here? I mean, we could appropriate it since the licenses are compatible, but what's more valuable to me is your commitment and dedication to building the guides in the first place. What do you think? Procyon 03:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)