From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Defendants' Antechamber

Trial begins

Shamspeare's Testimony: The Tea Inconsistency

William Shamspeare
William Shamspeare
William Shamspeare's Testimony
- The Tea Inconsistency -
  1. The Japanese man did come to my chamber with tea brew'd in a pot.
  2. 'Twas in my cup alone that the wicked miscreant secretly pour'd his wicked poison.
  3. Whilst feigning distraction in our debate, ne'er did a drop of his own drink pass his lips.
  4. When he departed by and by, I did use the tea that remain'd in his cup to make my coins of ice.
  5. Thus 'tis no surprise that poison be not found in the tea I did pour into the moulds of soap.

The Tea Inconsistency: Cross Examination

Examine The Two Teacups. One teacup has a red ring while the other teacup is clean. Once it's updated, present the two teacups on statement three. Narahudo points out that one teacup didn't "pass Shamspear's lips" but Natsume drinks it all on his teacup while its hot.

Judicial Findings: The Jurors' Contentions

Judicial Findings

- The Jurors' Contentions -

Juror No. 1: I'm a man of logic, me. And having considered all the evidence, the defendant must logically be guilty.
Juror No. 2: I do agree that gas is far too expensive. I can quite understand why the man would want to avoid paying.
Juror No. 3: The stuff explodes and it can poison you! It's absolutely lethal, gas is!
Juror No. 4: Gas doesn't come for free! It costs a fortune to deliver it around the city and maintain the pipes!
Juror No. 5: Truth be told, the tea my wife serves up for me is a little...sketchy at times.
Juror No. 6: If nothing else passed the victim's lips that night, there's no other explanation, is there?

Jury Examination: The Defence's Rebuttal