Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 40: Line 40:
== Preventing spoilers ==
== Preventing spoilers ==
This will no doubt be important in the future, but how will we prevent someone from editing any page and posting spoilers in them? Should we lock guides when they're completed? I wish there were a way to mark pages as protected yet still allow edits, then we could manually approve edits made to guides that are already complete. --[[User:Echelon|Echelon]] 21:26, 5 January 2006 (PST)
This will no doubt be important in the future, but how will we prevent someone from editing any page and posting spoilers in them? Should we lock guides when they're completed? I wish there were a way to mark pages as protected yet still allow edits, then we could manually approve edits made to guides that are already complete. --[[User:Echelon|Echelon]] 21:26, 5 January 2006 (PST)
* I suppose preventing spoilers will be quite difficult without some type of moderation. Maybe we should stick with a 'trust' policy for now, hoping that people throw spoilers in any place. If it gets out of hand then we can start protecting specific/completed guides, like how Wikipedia takes protective action when vandalism occurs. --[[User:Hack|Hack]] 02:53, 6 January 2006 (PST)
* I suppose preventing spoilers will be quite difficult without some type of moderation. Maybe we should stick with a 'trust' policy for now, hoping that people won't throw spoilers in any place. If it gets out of hand then we can start protecting specific/completed guides, like how Wikipedia takes protective action when vandalism occurs. --[[User:Hack|Hack]] 02:53, 6 January 2006 (PST)