Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(don't see a point) |
m (grammar) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think that maybe we should have a category, something like [[:Category:Core categories]], for the 11 main categories, so that they don't come under 'uncategorised'. Thoughts, anyone? --[[User:Melon247|<font color="red">Me</font><font color="green">lon</font>]][[User_talk:Melon247|<font color="orange">2</font><font color="purple">4</font><font color="blue">7</font>]] 17:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | I think that maybe we should have a category, something like [[:Category:Core categories]], for the 11 main categories, so that they don't come under 'uncategorised'. Thoughts, anyone? --[[User:Melon247|<font color="red">Me</font><font color="green">lon</font>]][[User_talk:Melon247|<font color="orange">2</font><font color="purple">4</font><font color="blue">7</font>]] 17:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I don't really see a point | :I don't really see a point, we'd still be left with one as we couldn't really categorise [[:Category:Core categories]].--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] ([[User talk:Rocky|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contribs]]) 17:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:32, 19 January 2009
I think that maybe we should have a category, something like Category:Core categories, for the 11 main categories, so that they don't come under 'uncategorised'. Thoughts, anyone? --Melon247 17:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't really see a point, we'd still be left with one as we couldn't really categorise Category:Core categories.--Rocky (talk · Contribs) 17:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)