Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney/Episode 3: Turnabout Serenade/Day 3 - Trial Former: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney/Episode 3: Turnabout Serenade/Day 3 - Trial Former (edit)
Revision as of 17:34, 7 October 2012
, 7 October 2012spacing and rearranging pics
(cleanup and adding pic which i will upload later) |
(spacing and rearranging pics) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
It should be obvious in this state, but Klavier objects again. He reminds you that his guitar burned during the second act, yet the shooting took place in the third, so how is this possible? You say that the shooting might NOT have occurred in the third act. Klavier argues that you and Ema heard the bullets on the third, but you counter by saying that Machi did hear it also, but the killer wasn't seen. | It should be obvious in this state, but Klavier objects again. He reminds you that his guitar burned during the second act, yet the shooting took place in the third, so how is this possible? You say that the shooting might NOT have occurred in the third act. Klavier argues that you and Ema heard the bullets on the third, but you counter by saying that Machi did hear it also, but the killer wasn't seen. | ||
[[File:AJAA Crime03b.png|right]] | |||
You then conclude that the killer said "Pull the switch! Now!" and the next moment, Klavier's guitar caught in flames. Your conclusion? The shooting took place on the second act, not the third act! | You then conclude that the killer said "Pull the switch! Now!" and the next moment, Klavier's guitar caught in flames. Your conclusion? The shooting took place on the second act, not the third act! | ||
Now you go into a conversation about the killer following the lyrics. It looks like the killer did the shooting before the burning. Why? Probably because it is to interfere with the investigation, fooling everyone into thinking that s/he had an alibi. | Now you go into a conversation about the killer following the lyrics. It looks like the killer did the shooting before the burning. Why? Probably because it is to interfere with the investigation, fooling everyone into thinking that s/he had an alibi. | ||
It sounds like it makes sense, but Klavier objects otherwise. He rminds you once more that it was Lamiroir that claims she heard the killer say that, but the window was closed. How could she have heard the voice? Answer that '''She was somewhere else'''. When asked where, '''Present''' the Air Vent on the diagram. She was up there. It's the only logical explanation. Apparently Lamiroir doesn't know the English word "air vent", thinking that the opening was a window. Lamiroir will admit that she was up there! Why was she up there? Lamiroir says it's hard to say, but she will testify anyways. | It sounds like it makes sense, but Klavier objects otherwise. He rminds you once more that it was Lamiroir that claims she heard the killer say that, but the window was closed. How could she have heard the voice? Answer that '''She was somewhere else'''. When asked where, '''Present''' the Air Vent on the diagram. She was up there. It's the only logical explanation. Apparently Lamiroir doesn't know the English word "air vent", thinking that the opening was a window. Lamiroir will admit that she was up there! Why was she up there? Lamiroir says it's hard to say, but she will testify anyways.{{-}} | ||
==Lamiroir's Testimony: Above the Ceiling== | ==Lamiroir's Testimony: Above the Ceiling== | ||
