Apollo Justice: Ace Attorney/Episode 3: Turnabout Serenade/Day 3 - Trial Former: Difference between revisions

From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
→‎Recess: corrected spelling error
m (→‎What I Heard: Cross-Examination: I'm confused. I hope this is correct. New statement or not.)
(→‎Recess: corrected spelling error)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
*He says that because the lyrics '''are in English''', he does not understand them.
*He says that because the lyrics '''are in English''', he does not understand them.


'''Perceive''' Machi's eyes. It looks like he is glancing at Lamiroir as soon as she said "English". Does that means Machi does understand English? Lamiroir says that Machi can only say the word "English" and nothing else. So how did he know about the lyrics? Machi says that he read the The Borginian Daily Bugle. You know that's not true, '''Present''' the '''Borginian Newspaper''' it does say something about the case, but it has no mention of the lyrics at all. Machi then remembers that he was mistaken. He now says that it was Lamiroir that told him about the lyrics! This doesn't look like the type to continue, but you fell your bracelet reacting. You request to add a new statement.
'''Perceive''' Machi's eyes. It looks like he is glancing at Lamiroir as soon as she said "English". Does that mean Machi does understand English? Lamiroir says that Machi can only say the word "English" and nothing else. So how did he know about the lyrics? Machi says that he read the The Borginian Daily Bugle. You know that's not true, '''Present''' the '''Borginian Newspaper''' it does say something about the case, but it has no mention of the lyrics at all. Machi then remembers that he was mistaken. He now says that it was Lamiroir that told him about the lyrics! This doesn't look like the type to continue, but you felt your bracelet reacting. You request to add a new statement.


*It was I who explained that the crime followed the song.
*It was I who explained that the crime followed the song.
Line 47: Line 47:


==Recess==
==Recess==
Machi insists that he didn't shoot LeTouse. He just went into the dressing room, and found LeTouse's body. Afterwords, he heard gunshots. Gunshots AFTER the body was found? Anyways, the vent he escaped through was connected to the stage and backstage. Machi learned this from the "magician".
Machi insists that he didn't shoot LeTouse. He just went into the dressing room, and found LeTouse's body. Afterwards, he heard gunshots. Gunshots AFTER the body was found? Anyways, the vent he escaped through was connected to the stage and backstage. Machi learned this from the "magician".


Machi refuses to testify about the cocoon. Maybe he is scared about the Borginian death penalty. It looks like you can't get him to talk. Probably calling up someone else would do the trick, even if it hurts.
Machi refuses to testify about the cocoon. Maybe he is scared about the Borginian death penalty. It looks like you can't get him to talk. Probably calling up someone else would do the trick, even if it hurts.


You call up Lamiroir to the stand. Yesterday, she was assaulted by someone. The assailant wanted her dead, but she escaped. She was taken to the hospital and recovered. Klavier says he didn't get such reports. Why would someone want Lamiroir killed? Maybe s/he didn't want her to say anything, about the murder no less! Perhaps Lamiroir is hiding something, a "nugget" of truth. Lamiroir is sure that Machi is innocent, and that she heard the voice of the shooter, which belonged to Daryan.
You call up Lamiroir to the stand. Yesterday, she was assaulted by someone. The assailant wanted her dead, but she escaped. She was taken to the hospital and recovered. Klavier says he didn't get such reports. Why would someone want Lamiroir killed? Maybe they didn't want her to say anything, about the murder no less! Perhaps Lamiroir is hiding something, a "nugget" of truth. Lamiroir is sure that Machi is innocent, and that she heard the voice of the shooter, which belonged to Daryan.


Lamiroir will testify about what she witnessed (or what she heard in this case).
Lamiroir will testify about what she witnessed (or what she heard in this case).
Line 76: Line 76:


It should be obvious in this state, but Klavier objects again. He reminds you that his guitar burned during the second act, yet the shooting took place in the third, so how is this possible? You say that the shooting might NOT have occurred in the third act. Klavier argues that you and Ema heard the bullets on the third, but you counter by saying that Machi did hear it also, but the killer wasn't seen.
It should be obvious in this state, but Klavier objects again. He reminds you that his guitar burned during the second act, yet the shooting took place in the third, so how is this possible? You say that the shooting might NOT have occurred in the third act. Klavier argues that you and Ema heard the bullets on the third, but you counter by saying that Machi did hear it also, but the killer wasn't seen.
[[File:AJAA Crime03b.png|right]]
[[File:AJAA Crime03b.png|right]]
You then conclude that the killer said "Pull the switch! Now!" and the next moment, Klavier's guitar caught in flames. Your conclusion? The shooting took place on the second act, not the third act!
You then conclude that the killer said "Pull the switch! Now!" and the next moment, Klavier's guitar caught in flames. Your conclusion? The shooting took place on the second act, not the third act!


Now you go into a conversation about the killer following the lyrics. It looks like the killer did the shooting before the burning. Why? Probably because it is to interfere with the investigation, fooling everyone into thinking that s/he had an alibi.
Now you go into a conversation about the killer following the lyrics. It looks like the killer did the shooting before the burning. Why? Probably because it is to interfere with the investigation, fooling everyone into thinking that they had an alibi.


It sounds like it makes sense, but Klavier objects otherwise. He reminds you once more that it was Lamiroir that claims she heard the killer say that, but the window was closed. How could she have heard the voice? Answer that '''She was somewhere else'''. When asked where, '''Present''' the Air Vent on the diagram. She was up there. It's the only logical explanation. Apparently Lamiroir doesn't know the English word "air vent", thinking that the opening was a window. Lamiroir will admit that she was up there! Why was she up there? Lamiroir says it's hard to say, but she will testify anyways.{{-}}
It sounds like it makes sense, but Klavier objects otherwise. He reminds you once more that it was Lamiroir that claims she heard the killer say that, but the window was closed. How could she have heard the voice? Answer that '''She was somewhere else'''. When asked where, '''Present''' the Air Vent on the diagram. She was up there. It's the only logical explanation. Apparently Lamiroir doesn't know the English word "air vent", thinking that the opening was a window. Lamiroir will admit that she was up there! Why was she up there? Lamiroir says it's hard to say, but she will testify anyways.
{{-}}


==Lamiroir's Testimony: Above the Ceiling==
==Lamiroir's Testimony: Above the Ceiling==
Line 113: Line 116:


==The Big Illusion: Cross-Examination==
==The Big Illusion: Cross-Examination==
Two minutes!? '''Press''' on the '''4th statement'''. Lamiroir says she had to stop. Why? When given the choice, choose '''Present evidence''', then '''Present''' Lamiroir's '''Brooch'''. You conclude about the teleportation, the Lamiroir before disappearing and the Lamiroir after, were two different people! Klavier says the latter was Valant, disguised as a woman. The real Lamiroir had dropped her brooch between the vents while she was running. It seems amazing that Valant could sing perfectly. Perhaps it was recorded? Klavier says it was live.
Two minutes!? '''Press''' on the '''4th statement'''. Lamiroir says she had to stop. Why? When given the choice, choose '''Present evidence''', then '''Present''' Lamiroir's '''Brooch'''. You conclude about the teleportation, the Lamiroir before disappearing and the Lamiroir after, were two different people! Klavier says the former was Valant, disguised as a woman. The real Lamiroir had dropped her brooch between the vents while she was running. It seems amazing that Valant could sing perfectly. Perhaps it was recorded? Klavier says it was live.


A new statement is added.
A new statement is added.
Anonymous user