Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 5: Rise from the Ashes/Day 3 - Trial Latter: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 5: Rise from the Ashes/Day 3 - Trial Latter (edit)
Revision as of 00:56, 4 January 2017
, 4 January 2017→Bloodstained Fingerprints: Cross-examination
(Added bold text. Removed a non-pressable statement.) |
|||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
'''Present''' the '''Evidence Locker''', and Marshall will freak, as he didn't know they'd installed the device in the new lockers. | '''Present''' the '''Evidence Locker''', and Marshall will freak, as he didn't know they'd installed the device in the new lockers. | ||
The judge wants Marshall to explain what he was doing in the Evidence Room but he's unresponsive, so Phoenix decides he can figure it out himself. The judge asks you to show where Marshall was. You examine the Evidence Room Floorplans. '''Present''' the '''victim's (V) spot'''. This is where Goodman was supposed to have been, but recall Meekins' | The judge wants Marshall to explain what he was doing in the Evidence Room but he's unresponsive, so Phoenix decides he can figure it out himself. The judge asks you to show where Marshall was. You examine the Evidence Room Floorplans. '''Present''' the '''victim's (V) spot'''. This is where Goodman was supposed to have been, but recall Meekins' story: if he asked Goodman for his ID card, why didn't he just show it, rather than have his knife out? Because if Marshall did show Goodman's ID, his cover would have been blown. | ||
Marshall is still not giving up as all your evidence is circumstantial; you don't have any solid proof. Luckily Edgeworth gives you some advice from his early career: return to the basics. Instead of finding evidence that Marshall was in disguise, find evidence that came about ''because'' he was in disguise. The tape should answer your questions, so you look at the tape once more. | Marshall is still not giving up as all your evidence is circumstantial; you don't have any solid proof. Luckily Edgeworth gives you some advice from his early career: return to the basics. Instead of finding evidence that Marshall was in disguise, find evidence that came about ''because'' he was in disguise. The tape should answer your questions, so you look at the tape once more. | ||
*'''Right view 3''': Pause just as Goodman | *'''Right view 3''': Pause just as "Goodman" lunges at Meekins. There's blood on his shoulder, lots of it! | ||
'''Present''' this to the court. There was lots of blood on it, so it would be too obvious that he fought Meekins. He had to hide it, and that hiding spot must have been his own locker. | '''Present''' this to the court. There was lots of blood on it, so it would be too obvious that he fought Meekins. He had to hide it, and that hiding spot must have been his own locker. | ||
