Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (ou, I see.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I think a bit of humor is acceptable, but it should still be kept to a very professional tone. And Echelon gets to be a ninja because he runs the place :). Personally, I think the Batman is quite tastefully done. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 20:09, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | :I think a bit of humor is acceptable, but it should still be kept to a very professional tone. And Echelon gets to be a ninja because he runs the place :). Personally, I think the Batman is quite tastefully done. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 20:09, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::So you say that ''humor'' is perfectly acceptable, do you? However if you look at Rocky's edit summary, it clearly said ''humour'' (which you did not mention was acceptable). Also, it appears Prod agrees with me on this one. Plus, Rocky could not aesthetically live in the bat cave, as the opening paragraph clearly states that we don't have one. SO HA! As for the Grue thing, I was actually thinking of uploading an image of a Domo Kun (aka an Uncyclopedia Grue) and using that as the topicon for StrategyWiki Administrators (I don't object to humor or humour on user pages, just keep it off of official pages). --[[User:Ryan Schmidt|Skizzerz]]<sup>[[User talk:Ryan Schmidt|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Schmidt|Contribs]]</sup> 20:13, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ::So you say that ''humor'' is perfectly acceptable, do you? However if you look at Rocky's edit summary, it clearly said ''humour'' (which you did not mention was acceptable). Also, it appears Prod agrees with me on this one. Plus, Rocky could not aesthetically live in the bat cave, as the opening paragraph clearly states that we don't have one. SO HA! As for the Grue thing, I was actually thinking of uploading an image of a Domo Kun (aka an Uncyclopedia Grue) and using that as the topicon for StrategyWiki Administrators (I don't object to humor or humour on user pages, just keep it off of official pages). --[[User:Ryan Schmidt|Skizzerz]]<sup>[[User talk:Ryan Schmidt|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ryan Schmidt|Contribs]]</sup> 20:13, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::I just thought that Rocky was English, and had a colourful sense of humour and was trying to grow a moustache. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] ([[User talk:Procyon|Talk]]) 20:19, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:19, 9 June 2007
Humor on the page
Zomg, Ryan, are you serious? I think Echelon set the tone for humor on that page the moment he said that he was a ninja, and put a picture of Batman on the page. If Echelon gets to be a ninja, I think it's fine if Rocky lives in the batcave, and if I'm eaten by a Grue. I love Grues! I almost bought a plush of that little guy for my wife, but now I'm rambling. Anyway, seriously, I think it promotes a happy sentiment if there's a little humor on that page. It certainly can't hurt. That's just my $0.02. Procyon (Talk) 20:06, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- I think a bit of humor is acceptable, but it should still be kept to a very professional tone. And Echelon gets to be a ninja because he runs the place :). Personally, I think the Batman is quite tastefully done. -- Prod (Talk) 20:09, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- So you say that humor is perfectly acceptable, do you? However if you look at Rocky's edit summary, it clearly said humour (which you did not mention was acceptable). Also, it appears Prod agrees with me on this one. Plus, Rocky could not aesthetically live in the bat cave, as the opening paragraph clearly states that we don't have one. SO HA! As for the Grue thing, I was actually thinking of uploading an image of a Domo Kun (aka an Uncyclopedia Grue) and using that as the topicon for StrategyWiki Administrators (I don't object to humor or humour on user pages, just keep it off of official pages). --SkizzerzTalk - Contribs 20:13, 8 June 2007 (CDT)