StrategyWiki talk:Community Portal: Difference between revisions

From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Line 93: Line 93:
Well, I would have appreciated a little more patience on the matter.  It's not that I object to having a pokedex on StrategyWiki.  By all means, if someone is willing to put in the time and effort to make one (and I mean REALLY make a GOOD one) than we should go for it.  But it's it just going to be a half-assed attempt to throw something up in order to claim that we have one, then I'd rather just rely on Bulbapedia, who has done a really impressive job.  Mason, really question yourself as to how dedicated you're going to be in filling out the 386+ entries that need to be filled out.  Either that, or find people who you know will be dedicated to the effort. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] 18:42, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
Well, I would have appreciated a little more patience on the matter.  It's not that I object to having a pokedex on StrategyWiki.  By all means, if someone is willing to put in the time and effort to make one (and I mean REALLY make a GOOD one) than we should go for it.  But it's it just going to be a half-assed attempt to throw something up in order to claim that we have one, then I'd rather just rely on Bulbapedia, who has done a really impressive job.  Mason, really question yourself as to how dedicated you're going to be in filling out the 386+ entries that need to be filled out.  Either that, or find people who you know will be dedicated to the effort. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] 18:42, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
:I won't be dedicated to it.  But that doesn't mean the red links won't inspire those people who will be dedicated to it.  I think the pokedex is definitly within the scope of strategywiki and therefore we should make it as obvious as possible that if someone wants to be dedicated to something like that, then can do so.  But if not that's all good to, that's what the bulbapedia links are for. -- [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|Contributions]])</sup> 20:33, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
:I won't be dedicated to it.  But that doesn't mean the red links won't inspire those people who will be dedicated to it.  I think the pokedex is definitly within the scope of strategywiki and therefore we should make it as obvious as possible that if someone wants to be dedicated to something like that, then can do so.  But if not that's all good to, that's what the bulbapedia links are for. -- [[User:Mason11987|Mason11987]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|Contributions]])</sup> 20:33, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
So, any news on this?  Is there a partnership or not? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] 19:53, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
So, any news on this?  Is there a partnership or not? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] 19:53, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
I feel that a [[#Zelda partnership]] should be made with thehylia.
I feel that a [[#Zelda partnership]] should be made with thehylia.
<small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Mageman|Mageman]] ([[User talk:Mageman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mageman|contribs]]) 14:28, 9 November 2006 (CDT).</small>


==Parser Functions==
==Parser Functions==