Welcome to StrategyWiki!
Hello Dandangp! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the StrategyWiki Guide. If you have a question about the content on this wiki, you can check out our staff lounge page. If you want to ask questions or hang out in IRC, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the forums. Please remember to sign your name on, and only on, talk pages by clicking 
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field as this helps to document all of your hard work. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! -- Prod (Talk) 14:18, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
Pokemon
The gba game graphics were greatly enhanced compared to the gb game graphics, and R/S did come after Crystal. -- Prod (Talk) 19:21, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
R/S might have came after Crystal..but it's still an opinion that R/S is a better game than crystal..In fact..Most pokemon fans believe that g/s/c were the best pokemon games around...and Crystal had a much longer storyline than R/S. Also..i don't find the GBA games graphics much different from the GB games.
- We try to avoid anything discussing which game was "better" since that's POV and more for a reviews site. To me, succeeded and followed by are synonyms, and don't mean one was better than the other. Comparing Image:Pokemon_RBY_ViridianCity.png to Image:PRS&E BattleDome.png is a major improvement in graphics quality. -- Prod (Talk) 19:31, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
I see your point...but you know that the GBA pic you showed to me is Emerald...right? And...I have all of the pokemon games that involves trainers...I find GB graphics perfectly acceptible, but if you think that GBA's graphics are improved...i guess i have nothing against that. But in my eyes...I believed that when a game is succeeded by another one...it means the other one was enhanced over the previous one in a number of ways. And i thought when a game was followed by another game...it was just made after the previous one.
- Prod is absolutely right, and your edits to the front-pages of the Pokémon games are not welcome. If you wish to continue contributing to StrategyWiki, your edits must remain free of personal bias. One of the definitions of the verb "to succeed" is "to come next after in an order or series, or in the course of events; follow." Its use in this case does not imply any preference. Undoing a revision made to one of your edits by a site sysop is the quickest way to get banned from the site. Please take this into consideration from now on. Thank you. Procyon (Talk) 20:02, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
K...I'll make sure to take that into consideration...I've always believed that a game succeeding another game means that it is "better" than the previous one...I'm sorry if i caused any problems for you guys. I'll make sure to keep my edits free of personal bias.
- I don't take myself that seriously, but the best way to proceed is to discuss first. We follow wikipedia's 3RR after which it's considered an edit war. If you are not satisfied with the current outcome, please feel free to voice your opinion here :). -- Prod (Talk) 20:28, 8 June 2008 (CDT)
I'm fine now, but I'll make sure to voice my opinion if I'm not satisfied with the edits here. I've added somethings i've found when i was playing my Emerald and Firered version that wasn't in R/S and Red and Blue versions.