User talk:Sigma 7: Difference between revisions

User talk:Sigma 7 (edit)

1,029 bytes added , 9 June 2009

9,412

edits

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 Hi there. I only removed certain units from pages because we do not have confirmed information about if this or that unit will appear in Starcraft II or it might be fanon. Thats all.([[User:Noryb989|Noryb989]] 18:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC))
+:The only way to confirm if a unit is within the official canon is when the game is released.  While you can predict which units are entering based on a single page, you also need to keep track of other communication (which may or may not be publicly accessible.)
+:Including only units listed on a single webpage is not a good measurement of potential canon, especially since Blizzard releases new material outside of said webpage.  They can easily discuss new units within their Battle Reports (found on a different location on the webpage), and developers can easily discuss statistics or features with partners or third party news organizations.
+:The early [http://toastytech.com/dooma/alphapr.html Doom Alphas] show exactly this: content is visible from screenshots and limited-distribution demos.  Even though the BFG didn't turn out to be a 40-ball shotgun, it should still be recorded as such until more information becomes available (i.e. the game gets released.) --[[User:Sigma 7|Sigma 7]] 19:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)