Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StrategyWiki:Staff lounge/2014/September (edit)
Revision as of 16:40, 8 November 2014
, 8 November 2014Robot: Archiving 1 thread from StrategyWiki:Staff lounge.
m (fix header) |
m (Robot: Archiving 1 thread from StrategyWiki:Staff lounge.) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
I made some changes to the USA faction [http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Command_%26_Conquer:_Generals/USA&diff=prev&oldid=722065 (here)], and will soon-ish do likewise for the other two factions. Yes, there is a patch doc file. One complication is the fact that this is a 2003 game, with the final supported patch being December, 2005. Most of the problems fixed ("issues addressed") relate to multiplayer support. I haven't checked; presumably multiplay is defunct, at least on EA servers. The patch documentation does list various balance tweaks as well. Either the list is incomplete, or some of the discrepancies that I discovered here are simple errors. In either case, I'll make a note of them as I find them, and make corrections eventually. I guess I'll have to continue playing, strictly for research purposes only, of course. ; ) If you're ''really'' interested in why I haven't registered, then [[User talk:71.20.250.51|my talk page]] is a better place for that discussion. —''E:'' ([[User talk:71.20.250.51|talk]]) • [[Special:Contributions/71.20.250.51|71.20.250.51]] 03:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | I made some changes to the USA faction [http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Command_%26_Conquer:_Generals/USA&diff=prev&oldid=722065 (here)], and will soon-ish do likewise for the other two factions. Yes, there is a patch doc file. One complication is the fact that this is a 2003 game, with the final supported patch being December, 2005. Most of the problems fixed ("issues addressed") relate to multiplayer support. I haven't checked; presumably multiplay is defunct, at least on EA servers. The patch documentation does list various balance tweaks as well. Either the list is incomplete, or some of the discrepancies that I discovered here are simple errors. In either case, I'll make a note of them as I find them, and make corrections eventually. I guess I'll have to continue playing, strictly for research purposes only, of course. ; ) If you're ''really'' interested in why I haven't registered, then [[User talk:71.20.250.51|my talk page]] is a better place for that discussion. —''E:'' ([[User talk:71.20.250.51|talk]]) • [[Special:Contributions/71.20.250.51|71.20.250.51]] 03:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:But that's precisely the problem. Unless you somehow have a statically assigned IP, [[User talk:71.20.250.51]] isn't guaranteed to be your talk page. Then if someone else happens to get assigned that IP, there's going to be a whole discussion that does not pertain to that person. That's the whole reason why we ask people to register; so that you get a uniquely assigned talk page where we people can communicate directly with you. There are other benefits of course, but that's one of the nicest. Personally, I just want to know so that we can identify things that we can do to better persuade people to register. Perhaps there's some misconception that we can clarify. '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 04:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | :But that's precisely the problem. Unless you somehow have a statically assigned IP, [[User talk:71.20.250.51]] isn't guaranteed to be your talk page. Then if someone else happens to get assigned that IP, there's going to be a whole discussion that does not pertain to that person. That's the whole reason why we ask people to register; so that you get a uniquely assigned talk page where we people can communicate directly with you. There are other benefits of course, but that's one of the nicest. Personally, I just want to know so that we can identify things that we can do to better persuade people to register. Perhaps there's some misconception that we can clarify. '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 04:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Legend of Zelda-Ocarina of Time in the Shadow Temple as an adult == | |||
I have put on my iron boots and I walk past the blade traps while going against the fan's wind gusts.There is fire being shot from the eye switch above. Using the Lens of Truth, I reveal a hidden room on the left of where I'm standing. I go into that room and bomb the pile of rocks on my right. Using the Lens of Truth a chest opens up to get a key. But I only get a rupee! I have shut off the game without saving, and it does the same thing again. How do I get that key for the next room? {{unsigned|Mrdon}} | |||
:It sounds like you missed a key in one of the previous rooms. From what I can tell, you should have acquired three so far. Note: although most of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time's guide has been revised by myself into a verified, polished form, I have not yet gotten to the Shadow Temple. My apologies if it is missing information. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 17:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | |||