From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Latest comment: 19 March 2009 by Najzere in topic Scope
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(stub info)
 
(keep)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Scope==
I'm not sure on if it fits the scope, but since it's sold on [http://www.impulsedriven.com/spengine2 Impulse] and was reviewed on GameTunnel and Rock Paper Shotgun, I've decided to create a stub.  Is there any objections?
I'm not sure on if it fits the scope, but since it's sold on [http://www.impulsedriven.com/spengine2 Impulse] and was reviewed on GameTunnel and Rock Paper Shotgun, I've decided to create a stub.  Is there any objections?
:Our policy on scope is [[StrategyWiki:Guide/Scope|found here]], and the game seems to hit a few the points, while missing or being iffy on others. I can't find anything on how popular it may be, but it has pretty good Google coverage. It's a commercially sold product developed by Natomic Studios, which is a borderline well-known "company." They mainly make freeware games, and I think this is the first time they're charging. All in all, I'm in support of keeping this guide, since the game looks good and more importantly is sold commercially, which implies it's good enough to be sold and has a player base. Also, this may be a Natomic's first step towards becoming a more legitimate developer. - [[User:Najzere|<span style="color:#909090">najzere</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Najzere|<span style="color:#993300">T</span>]]</sup> 19:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:08, 19 March 2009

Scope[edit source]

I'm not sure on if it fits the scope, but since it's sold on Impulse and was reviewed on GameTunnel and Rock Paper Shotgun, I've decided to create a stub. Is there any objections?

Our policy on scope is found here, and the game seems to hit a few the points, while missing or being iffy on others. I can't find anything on how popular it may be, but it has pretty good Google coverage. It's a commercially sold product developed by Natomic Studios, which is a borderline well-known "company." They mainly make freeware games, and I think this is the first time they're charging. All in all, I'm in support of keeping this guide, since the game looks good and more importantly is sold commercially, which implies it's good enough to be sold and has a player base. Also, this may be a Natomic's first step towards becoming a more legitimate developer. - najzereT 19:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]