69,764
edits
Category talk:Petz: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
→Game listing
(→Game listing: you guys are mindreaders) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
::It has the listing, of the games, but doesn't go into chronology, describe which versions are equivalent, or go into any detail. I removed it from the template because it belongs on this page. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 16:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | ::It has the listing, of the games, but doesn't go into chronology, describe which versions are equivalent, or go into any detail. I removed it from the template because it belongs on this page. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 16:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::A couple of days ago I had an idea to have a table on the Petz page with the UK and US titles on it. Are you guys side-kick or something? : ) {{User:Melon247/My sig}} 16:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | :::A couple of days ago I had an idea to have a table on the Petz page with the UK and US titles on it. Are you guys side-kick or something? : ) {{User:Melon247/My sig}} 16:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::It might be a good idea to verify the chronology. I pulled this list from GameFAQs by searching for "Petz", "Dogz", and "Catz". It could easily be missing information.--'''[[User:Dukeruckley|<font color="blue">Duke</font><font color="red">Ruckley</font>]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Dukeruckley|Talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Dukeruckley|Contribs]]</small></sup>''' 16:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::For now should I add the table? {{User:Melon247/My sig}} 16:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::Yes please. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 03:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Different series == | == Different series == | ||
| Line 186: | Line 189: | ||
How about we have sub-categories for the games, but the info on those pages will ''also'' be on the Petz category. And also, how about adding <nowiki>[[Category:Petz]]</nowiki> to all games in the Petz series? Because why should they all be in their sub-serieses and not in the main one? If they're in both, then that's problem solved, and people won't be as confused --[[User:Melon247|<font color="red">Me</font><font color="green">lon</font>]][[User_talk:Melon247|<font color="orange">2</font><font color="purple">4</font><font color="blue">7</font>]] 12:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | How about we have sub-categories for the games, but the info on those pages will ''also'' be on the Petz category. And also, how about adding <nowiki>[[Category:Petz]]</nowiki> to all games in the Petz series? Because why should they all be in their sub-serieses and not in the main one? If they're in both, then that's problem solved, and people won't be as confused --[[User:Melon247|<font color="red">Me</font><font color="green">lon</font>]][[User_talk:Melon247|<font color="orange">2</font><font color="purple">4</font><font color="blue">7</font>]] 12:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Currently we only put the most immediate series on games, because the series is in turn picked up by the parent series. I'm for keeping the sub-series separate from the Petz category because I think it's more helpful to users who like the game they're playing and want to find another one most like it. As for the information, a one to two sentence blurb on the Petz page should be sufficient, while the bulk of the information (if there ever is any) should go on the individual sub-series category pages. That's what makes most sense to me anyway. - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 15:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | :Currently we only put the most immediate series on games, because the series is in turn picked up by the parent series. I'm for keeping the sub-series separate from the Petz category because I think it's more helpful to users who like the game they're playing and want to find another one most like it. As for the information, a one to two sentence blurb on the Petz page should be sufficient, while the bulk of the information (if there ever is any) should go on the individual sub-series category pages. That's what makes most sense to me anyway. - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 15:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Categories == | |||
With the games that are basically under "other" in the Petz series or similar, should we just put the series as Petz? For example, under the Wanted Categories bit I saw a Monkeyz category. There are two games in it; [[Petz: Monkey Madness]] and [[Petz: Crazy Monkeyz]]. The only page that links to it is the page it's on ([[Petz: Monkey Madness]]). Also there are other games such as Bunnyz (currently in the Petz category anyway) and Petz: Vet which don't go in their own series since they're the only games that would be in there. {{User:Melon247/My sig}} 09:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:[[:Category:Mario]] does it, so why not Petz. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 01:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Should we have all the games here or just the ones that don't fit under Dogz, Catz, Hamsterz, etc.? I mean, we could easily just add Category:Petz to the Petz template (in an includeonly tag, I should think). {{User:Melon247/My sig}} 12:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::It's best how they are right now with games in the most specific category. It's redundant to categorize a game by its series and by its series' parent series. - [[User:Najzere|<span style="color:#909090">najzere</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Najzere|<span style="color:#993300">T</span>]]</sup> 15:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Petz Category split == | |||
Was the PC Petz category decided upon or created? If a decision was made, the category should be set up and links created, even if we don't have the actual games that belong. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 01:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
