Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Trials and Tribulations/Episode 5: Bridge to the Turnabout/Part 4-1: Trial: Difference between revisions

From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Trials and Tribulations/Episode 5: Bridge to the Turnabout/Part 4-1: Trial (edit)

Revision as of 11:47, 11 September 2012

136 bytes added ,  11 September 2012
cleanup and adding pic which i will upload later
(cleanup)
(cleanup and adding pic which i will upload later)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Before the Trial==
==Before the Trial==
Edgeworth will tell you that Iris will be the witness of the prosecution, she is going to make some sort of confession. Von Karma is out of the picture, since she is helping with the Psyche-Locks, which they should finish about three hours. So your opponent today is, who else, Godot.
Edgeworth will tell you that Iris will be the witness of the prosecution, she is going to make some sort of confession. Von Karma is out of the picture, since she is helping with the Psyche-Locks, which they should finish about three hours. So your opponent today is, who else, Godot.


Line 25: Line 24:


===The Real Murderer: Cross-Examination===
===The Real Murderer: Cross-Examination===
 
'''Press''' on the '''3rd statement'''. Iris says that Elise (Misty) threw her staff down and pulled out a dagger. When asked if you have a problem, choose '''There is one thing...'''. A new statement will be added.
'''Press''' on the '''3'''rd statement. Iris says that Elise (Misty) threw her staff down and pulled out a dagger. When asked if you have a problem, choose '''There is one thing...'''. A new statement will be added.


*She threw her staff away and pulled a dagger from inside her robe!
*She threw her staff away and pulled a dagger from inside her robe!


'''Present''' the '''Victim's Staff''' on this statement. Elise (Misty) wouldn't need a dagger, because she was already holding a weapon, a sword hidden inside her staff. Godot will say that it doesn't matter, because it doesn't change the fact that Elise tried to kill Maya. You know she wouldn't do that. '''Present Elise Deauxnim's Profile'''. You will reveal to the court that Elise was actually Maya's mother, Misty Fey. So, why would Misty kill her own daughter?
'''Present''' the '''Victim's Staff''' on this statement. Elise (Misty) wouldn't need a dagger, because she was already holding a weapon, a sword hidden inside her staff. Godot will say that it doesn't matter, because it doesn't change the fact that Elise tried to kill Maya. You know she wouldn't do that. '''Present Elise Deauxnim's Profile'''. You will reveal to the court that Elise was actually Maya's mother, Misty Fey. So, why would Misty kill her own daughter?
 
[[File:PWAATaT Dagger.png|right]]
Godot presents something from Iris's testimony. The dagger. It turns out it was behind the pine tree at the garden after the battle of mother and daughter. It has some blood in it, but Godot hasn't confirmed whose. The '''Dagger''' will be added to the Court Record and will be put through some tests.
Godot presents something from Iris's testimony. The dagger. It turns out it was behind the pine tree at the garden after the battle of mother and daughter. It has some blood in it, but Godot hasn't confirmed whose. The '''Dagger''' will be added to the Court Record and will be put through some tests.


Line 48: Line 46:


===The Battle: Cross-Examination===
===The Battle: Cross-Examination===
 
[[File:PWAATaT Stone Lantern.png|right]]
'''Present Elise's Autopsy Report''' on the '''4'''th statement. If Misty had her back at the lantern, then Maya would have stabbed her in the front. However, the autopsy report says that she was stabbed in the back, so if Misty's back was covered, then it would have been impossible for Maya to stab in the back!
'''Present Elise's Autopsy Report''' on the '''4th statement'''. If Misty had her back at the lantern, then Maya would have stabbed her in the front. However, the autopsy report says that she was stabbed in the back, so if Misty's back was covered, then it would have been impossible for Maya to stab in the back!


Godot now argues that the garden was pitch black for Iris to see the crime being committed, as none of the lanterns were lit. Godot will present the '''Stone Lantern''', which will be added to the Court Record. Shoot! He just blew of the contradictions with some explanations.
Godot now argues that the garden was pitch black for Iris to see the crime being committed, as none of the lanterns were lit. Godot will present the '''Stone Lantern''', which will be added to the Court Record. Shoot! He just blew of the contradictions with some explanations.
Line 70: Line 68:


===Sister Iris's Cover-Up: Cross-Examination===
===Sister Iris's Cover-Up: Cross-Examination===
 
'''Press''' the '''5th statement''' and ask '''About the tracks'''. Iris will say that she left the temple while it was still snowing. She went back after it went back. When asked if this was important, say '''It's very important'''. A new statement will be added.
'''Press''' the '''5'''th statement and ask '''About the tracks'''. Iris will say that she left the temple while it was still snowing. She went back after it went back. When asked if this was important, say '''It's very important'''. A new statement will be added.


*By the time the murder took place, the snow had already stopped.
*By the time the murder took place, the snow had already stopped.


Ah ha! A contradiction! '''Present''' the '''Weather Data''' on the '''4'''th statement. First of all, the snowed had stopped at 10:50PM, that's before the murder. And second, lightning struck the bridge, setting it on fire, five minutes before. Iris becomes shocked upon hearing this. How could she not know that the bridge was on fire?
Ah ha! A contradiction! '''Present''' the '''Weather Data''' on the '''4th statement'''. First of all, the snowed had stopped at 10:50PM, that's before the murder. And second, lightning struck the bridge, setting it on fire, five minutes before. Iris becomes shocked upon hearing this. How could she not know that the bridge was on fire?


Godot will again state that the contradiction isn't important, as two facts are still important, Misty's body was somehow carried across the bridge and Iris took her to the temple where she desecrated it. Godot wants you to explain how this all happened even though the bridge collapsed. One more testimony from Iris.
Godot will again state that the contradiction isn't important, as two facts are still important, Misty's body was somehow carried across the bridge and Iris took her to the temple where she desecrated it. Godot wants you to explain how this all happened even though the bridge collapsed. One more testimony from Iris.
Line 88: Line 85:
#Was the snow still falling or had it stopped...? Does it really matter that much?
#Was the snow still falling or had it stopped...? Does it really matter that much?
#Or are you saying that there is a way to cross a burning bridge?}}
#Or are you saying that there is a way to cross a burning bridge?}}
 
[[File:PWAAJFA_photo.png|right]]
Godot presents the '''Dusky Bridge Photo''', which is added to the Court Record. It looks like one of the wires are missing.
Godot presents the '''Dusky Bridge Photo''', which is added to the Court Record. It looks like one of the wires are missing.


===Moving the Body: Cross-Examination===
===Moving the Body: Cross-Examination===
 
[[File:PWAATaT Crime12.png|right]]
'''Present Larry's Sketch''' at the '''4'''th statement. You tell them that it is Iris, flying over the bridge. It seems that Elise's (Misty's) brilliant and highly-gifted apprentice (Larry) has drawn the sketch based on what he saw that night, Iris flying over the bridge. Godot wants you to show that the sketch is important.  Say that the sketch is '''a complete contradiction'''. Larry had drew "exactly" what he saw, so the sketch contradicts with reality you will now present the contradiction on the sketch. '''Present''' one of the suspension wires on either upper side of the screen.
'''Present Larry's Sketch''' at the '''4th statement'''. You tell them that it is Iris, flying over the bridge. It seems that Elise's (Misty's) brilliant and highly-gifted apprentice (Larry) has drawn the sketch based on what he saw that night, Iris flying over the bridge. Godot wants you to show that the sketch is important.  Say that the sketch is '''a complete contradiction'''. Larry had drew "exactly" what he saw, so the sketch contradicts with reality you will now present the contradiction on the sketch. '''Present''' one of the suspension wires on either upper side of the screen.


Godot wants proof. '''Present''' the '''Dusky Bridge Photo'''. In the sketch, the wires are above the bridge. In the photo, however, they are below! Your explanation? Laurice (Larry) was waiting for the love of his life to come to him. He fell asleep later by lying on his back! When lightning hit, he saw the figure fly "face up"! Your conclusion!? What Larry saw and drew was upside-down!
Godot wants proof. '''Present''' the '''Dusky Bridge Photo'''. In the sketch, the wires are above the bridge. In the photo, however, they are below! Your explanation? Laurice (Larry) was waiting for the love of his life to come to him. He fell asleep later by lying on his back! When lightning hit, he saw the figure fly "face up"! Your conclusion!? What Larry saw and drew was upside-down!
Paco
Administrators
11,282

edits


Retrieved from "https://strategywiki.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/632831"