StrategyWiki:Staff lounge/2008/April: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
StrategyWiki:Staff lounge/2008/April (view source)
Revision as of 20:01, 19 August 2012
, 19 August 2012delinked moo2
m (Protected "StrategyWiki:Staff lounge/2008/April": archive should not be edited [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (delinked moo2) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkarchive|thisyear=2008|prevmonth=March|nextmonth=May}} | {{Talkarchive|thisyear=2008|prevmonth=March|nextmonth=May}} | ||
{{ | {{StrategyWiki SL archives}} | ||
== When do contributions show? == | == When do contributions show? == | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Master of Orion II - request for comments== | ==Master of Orion II - request for comments== | ||
I've done quite a lot (? 60% - 70%) of | I've done quite a lot (? 60% - 70%) of Master of Orion II and would appreciate comments. Besides the usual aspects, I'd like to know whether this is the kind of thing StrategyWiki is interested in - I've got the impression from various discussions that StrategyWiki may be more interested in console games, FPSs and RPGs. | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::I posted my questions here because I thought relatively few people would watch the ''TA'' guide specifically, and because I hoped others would have come across similar layout issues in other guides. | ::I posted my questions here because I thought relatively few people would watch the ''TA'' guide specifically, and because I hoped others would have come across similar layout issues in other guides. | ||
::I agree it will probably be a good idea to split pages by unit type - Level 1 K-bots, Level 1 vehicles, ..... Level 2 K-bots, Level 2 vehicles, .... | ::I agree it will probably be a good idea to split pages by unit type - Level 1 K-bots, Level 1 vehicles, ..... Level 2 K-bots, Level 2 vehicles, .... | ||
::I'm happy to use tables where appropriate (see for example | ::I'm happy to use tables where appropriate (see for example Master of Orion II/List of Colony Leaders). But I suspect they won't work so well for lists of ''TA'' units because the comments vary so much in length (especially for the Commanders!). | ||
::OTOH I think tables are good for presenting the most basic facts about each units, followined by paragraphs of comments. | ::OTOH I think tables are good for presenting the most basic facts about each units, followined by paragraphs of comments. | ||
::In my previous post I mentioned an alternative layout for these basic facts. Here's an example, I'd like to know which you prefer. | ::In my previous post I mentioned an alternative layout for these basic facts. Here's an example, I'd like to know which you prefer. | ||
