Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "StrategyWiki talk:Community Portal/2006/August": Archive [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
m ({{tl}} -> {{t}}, Replaced: {{tl . {{t (2) AWB)
Line 189: Line 189:
:::But there's a better way. Just put another qif statement at the bottom of the template, that tests if num is defined, (ust like the other qif for num), and if it is, it puts the code <nowiki>[[Category:Guides at completion stage {{{num}}}]]</nowiki> which would put it in the right completion level category. And if everyyone doesn't mind, I actually already did this to [[Template:Header Nav]]. Now we just need to tell people to put the num= variable as the ''page'' completion not the guide completion. --[[User:Blendmaster|blendmaster]] 22:40, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
:::But there's a better way. Just put another qif statement at the bottom of the template, that tests if num is defined, (ust like the other qif for num), and if it is, it puts the code <nowiki>[[Category:Guides at completion stage {{{num}}}]]</nowiki> which would put it in the right completion level category. And if everyyone doesn't mind, I actually already did this to [[Template:Header Nav]]. Now we just need to tell people to put the num= variable as the ''page'' completion not the guide completion. --[[User:Blendmaster|blendmaster]] 22:40, 21 August 2006 (CDT)


::::So I see. However I don't think marking ''individual'' pages is all that useful, {{tl|wip}} and {{tl|stub}} already serve this purpose fairly well; a page that’s 0-25% done is usually a stub, and one that's 25-75% is of course wip. Plus, hardly any pages are tagged like this yet and the rest wouldn't be for a long time to come, further reducing its usefulness. I think what echelon had in mind was an easy way of showing readers finished (or nearly finished) guides at a glance, rather than serving a maintenance purpose. [[User:Garrett|Garrett]]<sup>[[User talk:Garrett|Talk]]</sup> 03:59, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
::::So I see. However I don't think marking ''individual'' pages is all that useful, {{t|wip}} and {{t|stub}} already serve this purpose fairly well; a page that’s 0-25% done is usually a stub, and one that's 25-75% is of course wip. Plus, hardly any pages are tagged like this yet and the rest wouldn't be for a long time to come, further reducing its usefulness. I think what echelon had in mind was an easy way of showing readers finished (or nearly finished) guides at a glance, rather than serving a maintenance purpose. [[User:Garrett|Garrett]]<sup>[[User talk:Garrett|Talk]]</sup> 03:59, 22 August 2006 (CDT)


::::: Well, if you are categorizing by the {{t|P}} anyway, and you want it as guide completion, then you should only  use it for the Header Nav on the main page of the guide and omit it in all other Header Navs in the guide. Otherwise, they will be categorized. A workaround for this would be to put the category in Header Nav inside yet ''another'' qif, which tests for a variable like categorize, so if you don't wan't the page categorized but still want to show the P image, you have to put categorize=no or something like that. --[[User:Blendmaster|blendmaster]] 12:28, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
::::: Well, if you are categorizing by the {{t|P}} anyway, and you want it as guide completion, then you should only  use it for the Header Nav on the main page of the guide and omit it in all other Header Navs in the guide. Otherwise, they will be categorized. A workaround for this would be to put the category in Header Nav inside yet ''another'' qif, which tests for a variable like categorize, so if you don't wan't the page categorized but still want to show the P image, you have to put categorize=no or something like that. --[[User:Blendmaster|blendmaster]] 12:28, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://strategywiki.org/wiki/StrategyWiki_talk:Community_Portal/2006/August"