Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(agree) |
m (sup dawg, i herd u liek categories so we put a category in yo category, so you can categorize while you categorize) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I don't really see a point, we'd still be left with one as we couldn't really categorise [[:Category:Core categories]].--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] ([[User talk:Rocky|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contribs]]) 17:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | :I don't really see a point, we'd still be left with one as we couldn't really categorise [[:Category:Core categories]].--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] ([[User talk:Rocky|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contribs]]) 17:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Agree with Rocky. Plus, this discussion should take place in the Community Issues forum. '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 19:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ::Agree with Rocky. Plus, this discussion should take place in the Community Issues forum. '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 19:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::We could categorize it as Offical pages or Miscellaneous. o_O - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 19:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:44, 19 January 2009
I think that maybe we should have a category, something like Category:Core categories, for the 11 main categories, so that they don't come under 'uncategorised'. Thoughts, anyone? --Melon247 17:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't really see a point, we'd still be left with one as we couldn't really categorise Category:Core categories.--Rocky (talk · Contribs) 17:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)