Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (response) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I've changed it to what I was suggesting. Is this what you had tried? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 11:48, 25 May 2008 (CDT) | :I've changed it to what I was suggesting. Is this what you had tried? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 11:48, 25 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
::Yeah, that was it - while it's a shorter page, it just looks messy to me. If there was numeric information to display, it would make sense to put it in a table, but with just text I'd say the previous layout is neater. --[[User:Aniki21|aniki21]] 16:53, 25 May 2008 (CDT) | ::Yeah, that was it - while it's a shorter page, it just looks messy to me. If there was numeric information to display, it would make sense to put it in a table, but with just text I'd say the previous layout is neater. --[[User:Aniki21|aniki21]] 16:53, 25 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
:::Heh, I love brevity. Anyone else feel like weighing in? If not, revert it to whatever you feel is best. -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 23:15, 25 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:15, 26 May 2008
List vs. Table[edit]
I did try out a table version of this list, but it wraps badly and ends up looking, in my opinion, significantly messier than the current layout. -- aniki21 07:41, 25 May 2008 (CDT)
- I've changed it to what I was suggesting. Is this what you had tried? -- Prod (Talk) 11:48, 25 May 2008 (CDT)
- Yeah, that was it - while it's a shorter page, it just looks messy to me. If there was numeric information to display, it would make sense to put it in a table, but with just text I'd say the previous layout is neater. --aniki21 16:53, 25 May 2008 (CDT)