Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 5: Rise from the Ashes/Day 2 - Trial Latter: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
There is no sixth statement in Gant's testimony. Ergo, his fifth statement must be pressed instead.
mNo edit summary
(There is no sixth statement in Gant's testimony. Ergo, his fifth statement must be pressed instead.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Header Nav|game=Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney}}
{{Header Nav|game=Phoenix Wright: }}
==Recess==
==Recess==
At the Defendant's Lobby, you'll have a visitor: Jake Marshall. You learn from him that Lana was indeed wearing a red muffler (scarf) that day.
At the Defendant's Lobby, you'll have a visitor: Jake Marshall. You learn from him that Lana was indeed wearing a red muffler (scarf) that day.
Line 31: Line 31:
If you '''press''' on that statement, (this is not required), you'll find out the knife was stolen on the day of the murder, and happens to be the murder weapon from a case long-solved. '''Press''' Gant's '''fourth statement'''. Who killed the detective at the Police Department? Gant says they arrested the suspect just now. Gant allows you to ask another question. You have a choice, so pick "'''Where the victim was found'''". Gant can't say, but he does tell you the murder took place in the Evidence Room. That's where he said the broken knife was stolen from!
If you '''press''' on that statement, (this is not required), you'll find out the knife was stolen on the day of the murder, and happens to be the murder weapon from a case long-solved. '''Press''' Gant's '''fourth statement'''. Who killed the detective at the Police Department? Gant says they arrested the suspect just now. Gant allows you to ask another question. You have a choice, so pick "'''Where the victim was found'''". Gant can't say, but he does tell you the murder took place in the Evidence Room. That's where he said the broken knife was stolen from!


'''Press''' Gant's '''sixth statement'''. It's already proven that the two cases are indeed connected, but now they're also connected by the Evidence Room. Gant decides he'll give some more information, unofficially.
'''Press''' Gant's '''fifth statement'''. It's already proven that the two cases are indeed connected, but now they're also connected by the Evidence Room. Gant decides he'll give some more information, unofficially.
*I'll cooperate, but I can't reveal the name of the victim in the Department, okay?
*I'll cooperate, but I can't reveal the name of the victim in the Department, okay?


Line 40: Line 40:
Gant tells Edgeworth that it's his fault for not knowing the connection in the first place, and making "Wrighto" (Phoenix) prove it. As demonstrated, rule 2 is that unregistered evidence must be relevant to the case of trial. Edgeworth apologizes for the confusion and asks for one more day of investigation. The judge permits this and adjourns court for the day.
Gant tells Edgeworth that it's his fault for not knowing the connection in the first place, and making "Wrighto" (Phoenix) prove it. As demonstrated, rule 2 is that unregistered evidence must be relevant to the case of trial. Edgeworth apologizes for the confusion and asks for one more day of investigation. The judge permits this and adjourns court for the day.


{{Footer Nav|game=Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney|prevpage=Episode 5: Rise from the Ashes/Day 2 - Trial Former|prevname=Day 2 — Trial Former|here=Day 2 Trial Latter|nextpage=Episode 5: Rise from the Ashes/Day 2 - Investigation|nextname=Day 2 — Investigation}}
{{Footer Nav|game=Phoenix Wright: |prevpage=: / - Trial Former|prevname= — Trial Former|here= — |nextpage=: / - Investigation|nextname= — Investigation}}
Anonymous user

Navigation menu