StrategyWiki:Featured guides/Current requests
These are the current nominations for featured guides, oldest first. Please follow the steps on StrategyWiki:Featured guides to nominate a guide.
|Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Justice For All|
|Nominated on 06:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC) (3/0/1)|
|Nominated on 21:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC) (4/0/0)|
Took me a while to get around to everything I wanted to with this, but I finally got there. The advanced techniques page also helps to clarify some tougher things, like how to go about completing chambers with few enough steps for the gold challenges. Let me know if you have any suggestions on anything! -- Ceegers (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
The guide was completed years ago, but Ceegers (talk · contribs) has put the finishing touches on it. I think this one only needs a spit shine to make it into our elite. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 21:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks :) The advanced and challenges sections (Chambers 13-18) still need adjusting, which I will be getting to soon. I'm also thinking that an additional appendix page Advanced Techniques would be a good idea. In a game like this, it is absolutely impossible to describe every way to complete a puzzle, and the developers intended it as such, but advanced techniques could be an excellent place to describe methods that may help in various chambers. This could also include some general hints for how to decrease portals, steps, and time in the challenges. I'm also good friends with one of the glitch masters of this game, so I can get a ton of info on them, which could be included, but I am somewhat inclined to not include glitches (however... at what point something becomes a glitch as opposed to being part of the game is debatable in this case).
One last thought... looks like the guide's supposed to have no red links... which I guess means something would have to be created for Narbacular Drop and Portal (Commodore 64)? Seems like a weird requirement, since those really have nothing to do with this game... -- Ceegers (talk) 10:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)