The Great Ace Attorney: Adventures/Episode 3: The Adventure of the Runaway Room/Trial, Part 2: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
The Great Ace Attorney: Adventures/Episode 3: The Adventure of the Runaway Room/Trial, Part 2 (edit)
Revision as of 18:45, 30 July 2021
, 30 July 2021→What The Witnesses Really Saw: Cross Examination
m (→What The Witnesses Really Saw: Cross Examination: minor edit to change the options' text to the text present in-game) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==What The Witnesses Really Saw: Cross Examination== | ==What The Witnesses Really Saw: Cross Examination== | ||
'''Press''' on the '''fifth statement.''' Could they have really seen everyone inside the coach looking through the skylight? Select '''They might not have been able to''' A diagram will be presented. Indicate the '''lower right seating area'''. Since it is directly underneath where the witnesses were seated, they could have overlooked a passenger sitting there. But who could have been sitting in that blind spot? Select '''I have an inkling''' When prompted, '''present Magnus McGilded's profile,''' the defendant himself! | '''Press''' on the '''fifth statement.''' Could they have really seen everyone inside the coach looking through the skylight? Select '''They might not have been able to.''' A diagram will be presented. Indicate the '''lower right seating area'''. Since it is directly underneath where the witnesses were seated, they could have overlooked a passenger sitting there. But who could have been sitting in that blind spot? Select '''I have an inkling.''' When prompted, '''present Magnus McGilded's profile,''' the defendant himself! | ||
Naruhodou suggests that McGilded may not have been seated next to the victim at all, but directly across. The witnesses testified that they clearly remembered seeing blood on both his gloves, despite blood only being found on one. Therefore, those gloves must have belonged to someone else sitting next to the victim - the true culprit! | Naruhodou suggests that McGilded may not have been seated next to the victim at all, but directly across. The witnesses testified that they clearly remembered seeing blood on both his gloves, despite blood only being found on one. Therefore, those gloves must have belonged to someone else sitting next to the victim - the true culprit! | ||
