Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (New section: Units - Characters?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Hey. Who forgot Command and Conquer things here?([[User:MrSue|MrSue]] 23:52, 27 February 2008 (CST)) | Hey. Who forgot Command and Conquer things here?([[User:MrSue|MrSue]] 23:52, 27 February 2008 (CST)) | ||
:What are you talking about? --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 00:26, 28 February 2008 (CST) | :What are you talking about? --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 00:26, 28 February 2008 (CST) | ||
I meant the images. There are two games, Command and Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars and Kanes wrath. Which image name could fit better?([[User:MrSue|MrSue]] 00:55, 1 March 2008 (CST)) | |||
== Units - Characters? == | == Units - Characters? == | ||
For all RTS games I've been categorizing the art as Models, but should they also be "characters"? Or can we make a subcat under characters called "units"? Oh dang. Should I be categorizing them as sprites?! AHHHH. See [[StarCraft II]]. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 00:28, 28 February 2008 (CST) | For all RTS games I've been categorizing the art as Models, but should they also be "characters"? Or can we make a subcat under characters called "units"? Oh dang. Should I be categorizing them as sprites?! AHHHH. See [[StarCraft II]]. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 00:28, 28 February 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 06:55, 1 March 2008
Fair use?
Will we eventually have to use fair-use templates like Wikipedia? bibliomaniac15 17:47, 1 March 2007 (CST)
- I think this was discussed before (a while back), and the conclusion was that we needn't bother, since almost all of our images are under fair use anyway, so we can just put a blanket announcement somewhere to that effect. --DrBob (Talk) 23:50, 1 March 2007 (CST)
- It's unlikely. Our fair use claim is particularly strong because strategy guides are inherently complementary works, and this is backed up by caselaw: "copying that is complementary to the copyrighted work (in the sense that nails are complements of hammers) is fair use, but copying that is a substitute ... (in the sense that nails are substitutes for pegs or screws) ... is not fair use."[1] All our images fall under the former. And besides, I bet companies would be only too pleased that guides are showing off all the neat features of their games... it's free advertising! :) GarrettTalk 00:51, 2 March 2007 (CST)
File Names
Should we disallow game name abbreviations but allow descriptors to be abreviated (i.e. orig for original)? The game name is like the most important thing, and abbreviations can lead to other games having the same abbreviation... --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 19:27, 5 May 2007 (CDT)
- I think having the full name is helpful, but collisions shouldn't be too common even with just the abbreviation. We should promote going with full names, but allow short forms. -- Prod (Talk) 14:35, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
Command and Conquer
Hey. Who forgot Command and Conquer things here?(MrSue 23:52, 27 February 2008 (CST))
- What are you talking about? --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 00:26, 28 February 2008 (CST)
I meant the images. There are two games, Command and Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars and Kanes wrath. Which image name could fit better?(MrSue 00:55, 1 March 2008 (CST))
Units - Characters?
For all RTS games I've been categorizing the art as Models, but should they also be "characters"? Or can we make a subcat under characters called "units"? Oh dang. Should I be categorizing them as sprites?! AHHHH. See StarCraft II. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 00:28, 28 February 2008 (CST)