Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (New thread + comment) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Regional releases/Famicom== | ==Regional releases/Famicom== | ||
We have both the NES and the Famicom listed. We all know that these are normally considered the same, but I can see that adding a separate Famicom listing is necessary for Japan exclusive releases. Is this what it (and other regional system differences) was intended for? --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | We have both the NES and the Famicom listed. We all know that these are normally considered the same, but I can see that adding a separate Famicom listing is necessary for Japan exclusive releases. Is this what it (and other regional system differences) was intended for? --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I would say probably not. It's not like we'd have a separate list for Japanese PSX or Dreamcast games, so the NES/Famicom distinction should be in system name only. At best, we could justify having a Famicom Disk System release list as a separate list. Nice work on the recent cleanup, btw. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] ([[User talk:Procyon|Talk]]) 11:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:38, 16 November 2008
Sources?
So, where is everyone getting this information from? Wikipedia is nice and all, but some of the categories include stuff that aren't games, I was just wondering whether we should source it from one place (official or otherwise) or whether we should make an (educated) guess from Wikipedia or whatever.--Froglet 09:04, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
- Wikipedia has a List of video games page that links to different lists by system. I say we just use those lists... This process is going to be extremely tedious, especially for the larger systems (Playstation 1 and 2, Super Nintendo, etc.). Keep in mind that some games might be repeats under different names, as well.--DukeRuckley 11:27, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
- Tedious, yes, but extremely necessary for tracking our content (or lack thereof). --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Regional releases/Famicom
We have both the NES and the Famicom listed. We all know that these are normally considered the same, but I can see that adding a separate Famicom listing is necessary for Japan exclusive releases. Is this what it (and other regional system differences) was intended for? --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- I would say probably not. It's not like we'd have a separate list for Japanese PSX or Dreamcast games, so the NES/Famicom distinction should be in system name only. At best, we could justify having a Famicom Disk System release list as a separate list. Nice work on the recent cleanup, btw. Procyon (Talk) 11:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)