43,117
edits
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Statistical comparison (edit)
Revision as of 21:32, 17 May 2010
, 17 May 2010→Special Attacks: reply
Chalkwriter (talk | contribs) (→Special Attacks: new section) |
Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (→Special Attacks: reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
I have noticed that there is not a section for special attacks, meaning no info on the damage or flight distance done by these attacks. However there is probably not enough room to add it onto the tables. As they are probably the most important attacks in the game, should we create new tables especially for special attacks?--[[User:Chalkwriter|Chalkwriter]] 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | I have noticed that there is not a section for special attacks, meaning no info on the damage or flight distance done by these attacks. However there is probably not enough room to add it onto the tables. As they are probably the most important attacks in the game, should we create new tables especially for special attacks?--[[User:Chalkwriter|Chalkwriter]] 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:It's not so much that there's no room in the tables, rather that there is a separate table for each type of attack. So, following that principle, there should be a separate section and table for special attacks. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font><font color="orange">dow</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Moydow|<font color="blue">T</font>]]{{dot}}[[Special:Contributions/Moydow|<font color="gold">C</font>]]{{dot}}[[User:Moydow/Userboxes|<font color="red">Boxes</font>]]</sup> 19:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Aye, a new section will suffice. Also, I would argue that the "most important attacks in the game" are smash attacks, as the game series is named after them. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 21:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC) | |||