Welcome to StrategyWiki!
Hello Blue Phoenix! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the editing article or the StrategyWiki Guide. If you have a question about the content on this wiki, you can check out our staff lounge page. If you want to ask questions or hang out in IRC, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the community portal talk page. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field as this helps to document all of your hard work. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! -- Prod (Talk) 14:59, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
Image categorisation
I see you've been uploading a few images lately. When doing so, could you please make sure to categorise them using the correct image categories? The image policy is viewable here, and contains all the information you'll need to categorise future uploads. --Skizzerz 21:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Command Move template
I'm not sure why you made an identical copy of {{Special Move}} but I deleted it. Just use the original template, or if you like, you can try using {{Command List}}, although it's a bit more complicated. But please do not make duplicate templates from now on. Procyon (Talk) 21:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again. Could you please work with us to let us know what you're like to accomplish with the move lists? Some of the motions that you've recently uploaded are either unnecessary, or rather unfortunate looking. If you need some help with that stuff, that's what we're here for. Talk with us. Procyon (Talk) 02:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Move list testing
Hi Blue Phoenix. I like how you've arranged your table with the headers. One thing I liked about Ganj's arrangment is that it unified the input and button columns into one column. If we could come up with a compromise between the two designs, I think that would be kind of cool. Let me know what you think. Procyon (Talk) 15:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
The new style is too harsh
Hi Blue Phoenix. I saw the experimentation that you were doing in SvC:MotM, and some of the sysops agree that the headers above the moves are a little too glaring and high contrast. And others don't particularly like the spacing between the letters. The blue was a little easier on the eyes at least. Personally, I'm not sure why you find denoting the type of move being listed to be such a high priority. Most players don't really care what kind of move it is, they just want to know what moves can be performed and then they figure out how to use them on their own. I'm not saying we shouldn't try to label the different move types, but I thought that the conclusions we came to in the Move Lists project page was a pretty good one and it had consensus. Procyon (Talk) 21:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
SNK vs. Capcom: Ryu
Hi, I put the Match of the Millennium: Ryu page back to an earlier version. All the tables you added were duplicate moves of the ones at the bottom of the page, which uses the fight move list template. The moves at the beginning of the page were basic moves that are covered on the How to Play page. The only thing I saw that was new, was a picture. If you can incorporate the pic into the page that's great, but there's no sense in giving the same information twice, especially in dissimilar table formats. - najzere 16:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- check the "Notes" sections. It mentioned if a move is canceleble, juggleble or knocks down. Although it was incredibly sparse, the plan was for the new list to be far more comprehensively detailed then the on at the bottom. --Blue Phoenix 18:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)