43,117
edits
User talk:RAP: Difference between revisions
From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
→All caps: reply
m (→All caps: Forgot to add sig.) |
Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (→All caps: reply) |
||
| Line 533: | Line 533: | ||
==All caps== | ==All caps== | ||
Please do not use all capitalized letters anywhere on this site. We use sentence case, so '''Note'': sentence is the syntax we use (where sentence begins with a lower case letter). --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 16:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | Please do not use all capitalized letters anywhere on this site. We use sentence case, so '''Note'': sentence is the syntax we use (where sentence begins with a lower case letter). --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 16:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:{{user|Notmyhandle}}, would underlining be more acceptable? I would like to make bulletpoints that specifically call the user's attention on a particular entry with emphasis: like "<u>'''Tip:'''</u>" for giving the player info on how to effectively utilize this given tool, and "<u>'''Caution:'''</u>" for giving the player potential risks, and how to minimize risk as much as possible. --[[User:RAP|RAP]] ([[User talk:RAP|talk]]) 17:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | :{{user|Notmyhandle}}, would underlining be more acceptable? I would like to make bulletpoints that specifically call the user's attention on a particular entry with emphasis: like "<u>'''Tip:'''</u>" for giving the player info on how to effectively utilize this given tool, and "<u>'''Caution:'''</u>" for giving the player potential risks, and how to minimize risk as much as possible. --[[User:RAP|RAP]] ([[User talk:RAP|talk]]) 17:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
::(Can of worms incoming) Well, we do not underline anything except headers. Underline has been excluded from [[StrategyWiki:Guide/Wiki markup]]. It's a style thing. However, I can see on [[Bomberman/How to play]] how it would be useful to separate, visually, the "Most valuable powerup!" type of comments from the "Tip" bullet points. However, those comments (e.g. "Most valuable powerup!") do not appear to need to be bolded at all (and thus should not be), so underline would not be helpful in this example. Unrelated, the value of those power-ups is subjective and up for scrutiny. An example would be better than such a simple statement. I would prefer to keep underline prohibited. Bold and the occasional italics is sufficient. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 17:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
