61,129
edits
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Changes due to updates: IP talk pages
(→Changes due to updates: Reply) |
(→Changes due to updates: IP talk pages) |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
←<small>[''outdent'']</small> | ←<small>[''outdent'']</small> | ||
I made some changes to the USA faction [http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Command_%26_Conquer:_Generals/USA&diff=prev&oldid=722065 (here)], and will soon-ish do likewise for the other two factions. Yes, there is a patch doc file. One complication is the fact that this is a 2003 game, with the final supported patch being December, 2005. Most of the problems fixed ("issues addressed") relate to multiplayer support. I haven't checked; presumably multiplay is defunct, at least on EA servers. The patch documentation does list various balance tweaks as well. Either the list is incomplete, or some of the discrepancies that I discovered here are simple errors. In either case, I'll make a note of them as I find them, and make corrections eventually. I guess I'll have to continue playing, strictly for research purposes only, of course. ; ) If you're ''really'' interested in why I haven't registered, then [[User talk:71.20.250.51|my talk page]] is a better place for that discussion. —''E:'' ([[User talk:71.20.250.51|talk]]) • [[Special:Contributions/71.20.250.51|71.20.250.51]] 03:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | I made some changes to the USA faction [http://strategywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Command_%26_Conquer:_Generals/USA&diff=prev&oldid=722065 (here)], and will soon-ish do likewise for the other two factions. Yes, there is a patch doc file. One complication is the fact that this is a 2003 game, with the final supported patch being December, 2005. Most of the problems fixed ("issues addressed") relate to multiplayer support. I haven't checked; presumably multiplay is defunct, at least on EA servers. The patch documentation does list various balance tweaks as well. Either the list is incomplete, or some of the discrepancies that I discovered here are simple errors. In either case, I'll make a note of them as I find them, and make corrections eventually. I guess I'll have to continue playing, strictly for research purposes only, of course. ; ) If you're ''really'' interested in why I haven't registered, then [[User talk:71.20.250.51|my talk page]] is a better place for that discussion. —''E:'' ([[User talk:71.20.250.51|talk]]) • [[Special:Contributions/71.20.250.51|71.20.250.51]] 03:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
:But that's precisely the problem. Unless you somehow have a statically assigned IP, [[User talk:71.20.250.51]] isn't guaranteed to be your talk page. Then if someone else happens to get assigned that IP, there's going to be a whole discussion that does not pertain to that person. That's the whole reason why we ask people to register; so that you get a uniquely assigned talk page where we people can communicate directly with you. There are other benefits of course, but that's one of the nicest. Personally, I just want to know so that we can identify things that we can do to better persuade people to register. Perhaps there's some misconception that we can clarify. '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 04:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||