Anonymous user
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney/Episode 1: The First Turnabout/Day 1 - Trial (edit)
Revision as of 04:40, 6 March 2015
, 6 March 2015no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{Phoenix Wright Testimony \|char=(.*) \|name=(.*)\'s" to "{{Phoenix Wright Testimony |char=$1 |name=$2") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{Phoenix Wright Testimony | {{Phoenix Wright Testimony | ||
|char=sahwit | |char=sahwit | ||
|name=Sahwit |subtitle=Witness Account |testimony=# I was going door-to-door, selling subscriptions when I saw a man fleeing an apartment. | |name=Sahwit |subtitle=Witness's Account |testimony=# I was going door-to-door, selling subscriptions when I saw a man fleeing an apartment. | ||
# I thought he must be in a hurry because he left the door half-open behind him. | # I thought he must be in a hurry because he left the door half-open behind him. | ||
# Thinking it strange, I looked inside the apartment. | # Thinking it strange, I looked inside the apartment. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Now it is time to cross-examine. You can press every statement without getting any penalties. You need to find the lie in his testimony, and prove it is a lie by presenting evidence from the Court Record. | Now it is time to cross-examine. You can press every statement without getting any penalties. You need to find the lie in his testimony, and prove it is a lie by presenting evidence from the Court Record. | ||
If you press Sahwit's ''' | If you press Sahwit's '''9th''' statement, Mia will tell you that this is suspicious. Check the Autopsy Report in the Court Record. Notice anything contradictory? The victim died between 4:00 PM and 5:00 PM, however the witness is saying he found the body at 1:00 PM. '''Present Cindy's Autopsy Report''' while his statement about the time is on the screen. | ||
Congratulations. You found your first contradiction in a testimony. The witness will now have to revise his testimony and try to explain why he was so certain it was 1:00 PM. | Congratulations. You found your first contradiction in a testimony. The witness will now have to revise his testimony and try to explain why he was so certain it was 1:00 PM. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==The Time of Discovery: Cross-examination== | ==The Time of Discovery: Cross-examination== | ||
In this revised testimony, you can press his second statement. Mia will step in and say that it sounds fishy. There is no way he could have heard the television. Check the Court Record and present the '''Blackout Record''' against any of Sahwit's statements. The television could not have been on due to the blackout. | |||
Sahwit will testify once again to try and back out of his lies. | Sahwit will testify once again to try and back out of his lies. | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
==Hearing the Time: Cross-examination== | ==Hearing the Time: Cross-examination== | ||
You have to figure out which statement is wrong by yourself this time, but it is pretty obvious. He is now saying that the murder weapon is a clock, but you already have the murder weapon, and it's the statue of "The Thinker." Present the '''Statue''' to the court against | You have to figure out which statement is wrong by yourself this time, but it is pretty obvious. He is now saying that the murder weapon is a clock, but you already have the murder weapon, and it's the statue of "The Thinker." '''Present''' the '''Statue''' to the court against '''statements 2, 3 or 4'''. | ||
He is sure that the Statue is a clock, and Payne confirms this claim. The '''Statue''' will be updated in the Court Record. When the neck is tilted, it says the time aloud and this is how Sahwit heard the time that day. At this point the judge will ask you if you have any problems with the witness' testimony. How could Sahwit know that the statue was actually a clock? That could only be discovered by a close inspection, and Sahwit testified that he never entered the apartment. He must be lying. Choose "'''Yes'''" to the judge's question. | He is sure that the Statue is a clock, and Payne confirms this claim. The '''Statue''' will be updated in the Court Record. When the neck is tilted, it says the time aloud and this is how Sahwit heard the time that day. At this point the judge will ask you if you have any problems with the witness' testimony. How could Sahwit know that the statue was actually a clock? That could only be discovered by a close inspection, and Sahwit testified that he never entered the apartment. He must be lying. Choose "'''Yes'''" to the judge's question. | ||