From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Mount&Blade: new section)
(good job)
Line 12: Line 12:


The table on the [[Mount&Blade/Companion Comparison|Companion Comparison page]] is huge and forces some major side scrolling. It would be better to split it up into different sections, perhaps along the lines of the subheadings at the top of the table (i.e. Companion, Attributes, Personal Skills, etc.). Also, because we have our own navigation system ({{t|Header Nav}} and {{t|Footer Nav}}), the "See also" sections aren't really necessary. The {{t|details}} template or just a normal link while explaining related pages in the text fits more into this particular wiki's style. Thanks for all the great info you're adding into the M&B pages, it's looking really great! - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 17:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The table on the [[Mount&Blade/Companion Comparison|Companion Comparison page]] is huge and forces some major side scrolling. It would be better to split it up into different sections, perhaps along the lines of the subheadings at the top of the table (i.e. Companion, Attributes, Personal Skills, etc.). Also, because we have our own navigation system ({{t|Header Nav}} and {{t|Footer Nav}}), the "See also" sections aren't really necessary. The {{t|details}} template or just a normal link while explaining related pages in the text fits more into this particular wiki's style. Thanks for all the great info you're adding into the M&B pages, it's looking really great! - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 17:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:The page looks much better, good job. In the future if you use the "Show preview" button below the edit text box, right next to the "Save page" button, you'll be able to see how the page is coming along without having to put up notices on the page and without multiple edits going into Recent Changes and the pages edit history. - [[User:Najzere|'''naj''']][[User_talk:Najzere|<font color="green">zere</font>]] 23:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:34, 28 January 2009

Welcome to StrategyWiki!

Hello Gumption! Welcome to StrategyWiki. Thank you for your contributions. If you have any questions, just contact a sysop through their talk page or post on the staff lounge, and they'd be happy to help. If you need help editing, check the StrategyWiki Guide. If you have a question about the content on this wiki, you can check out our staff lounge page. If you want to ask questions or hang out in IRC, we're usually around. On the other hand, if you have ideas for StrategyWiki, bring them up on the forums. Please remember to sign your name on, and only on, talk pages by clicking Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field as this helps to document all of your hard work. Feel free to delete this message from your talk page if you like, or keep it for reference. Happy editing! -- Baejung92 (talk) 02:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit summary note

Could you please actually write one? Just typing aaa isn't very helpful. It doesn't take very much time to write a little more. RobJ1981 05:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, when adding new pages to a guide, please add the links to the Table of Contents. -- Prod (Talk) 06:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
For attribution, please put the links/usernames in the edit summaries rather than on the page. Anyone can remove links from a page, but it's impossible to remove it from the edit histories (which should follow the content wherever it goes). Keep up the good work :) -- Prod (Talk) 06:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Mount&Blade

The table on the Companion Comparison page is huge and forces some major side scrolling. It would be better to split it up into different sections, perhaps along the lines of the subheadings at the top of the table (i.e. Companion, Attributes, Personal Skills, etc.). Also, because we have our own navigation system ({{Header Nav}} and {{Footer Nav}}), the "See also" sections aren't really necessary. The {{details}} template or just a normal link while explaining related pages in the text fits more into this particular wiki's style. Thanks for all the great info you're adding into the M&B pages, it's looking really great! - najzere 17:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The page looks much better, good job. In the future if you use the "Show preview" button below the edit text box, right next to the "Save page" button, you'll be able to see how the page is coming along without having to put up notices on the page and without multiple edits going into Recent Changes and the pages edit history. - najzere 23:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)