14,774
edits
No edit summary |
(added comment) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Thanks for the input. I saw ZX listed as a sub-series of Mega Man X and Zero, so wasn't sure which way the organization should go. Should ZX be placed as a subseries of X or Zero? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|talk]]) 02:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC) | :Thanks for the input. I saw ZX listed as a sub-series of Mega Man X and Zero, so wasn't sure which way the organization should go. Should ZX be placed as a subseries of X or Zero? -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|talk]]) 02:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
::I'd say either make ZX a sub-series of Zero, which is a sub-series of X, which is a sub-series of regular Mega Man, or maybe don't nest them and just make X, Zero, and ZX all sub-series of regular Mega Man. [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] ([[User talk:Wanderer|talk]]) 02:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC) | ::I'd say either make ZX a sub-series of Zero, which is a sub-series of X, which is a sub-series of regular Mega Man, or maybe don't nest them and just make X, Zero, and ZX all sub-series of regular Mega Man. [[User:Wanderer|Wanderer]] ([[User talk:Wanderer|talk]]) 02:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
Two items alone are not a series. For example, who would say "I have a series of sisters" when he has two sisters? Who would say "I tasted a series of snacks" after tasting two snacks? Who would say "I wear a series of shoes" wearing a pair of shoes? In my opinion, "sub-sub-series of two" create unnecessary fragmentation in the website. --[[User:Abacos|Abacos]] ([[User talk:Abacos|talk]]) 10:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC) |