From StrategyWiki, the video game walkthrough and strategy guide wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Almost done)
(I think I'm done with SMA.)
Line 46: Line 46:
*{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 16:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
*{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 16:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
*[[User:T.testLP|T.testLP]]([[User talk:T.testLP|talk]]) 09:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
*[[User:T.testLP|T.testLP]]([[User talk:T.testLP|talk]]) 09:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
*'''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 02:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
|oppose=
|oppose=
<!-- Put your name below if you oppose, don't forget to sign -->
<!-- Put your name below if you oppose, don't forget to sign -->


|undecided=
|undecided=
*'''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 23:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


|comments=
|comments=
Line 59: Line 59:
*Wasn't a previous nomination of [[Super Mario Bros.]] rejected as we wanted to get a compilation title like [[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]] featured in one go? Of course, I personally think this guide is good enough to be featured even without the SMA info, but if this nomination is successful I think we should re-nominate [[Super Mario Bros.]] as well. [[User:T.testLP|T.testLP]]([[User talk:T.testLP|talk]]) 09:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
*Wasn't a previous nomination of [[Super Mario Bros.]] rejected as we wanted to get a compilation title like [[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]] featured in one go? Of course, I personally think this guide is good enough to be featured even without the SMA info, but if this nomination is successful I think we should re-nominate [[Super Mario Bros.]] as well. [[User:T.testLP|T.testLP]]([[User talk:T.testLP|talk]]) 09:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
**This is off-topic, but Super Mario Bros. Deluxe appears complete. SMB, Deluxe, and the related ToC and sub-pages need some cleanup, but they are close to being featured, too. That collection would be the biggest group of featured guides we could do in one swoop (~4 game catridges off our list). Anyways, with [[Super Mario Advance]], I think postponing featured statuses because an additional, related title isn't featured is unproductive. It is better if we upgrade a guide that deserves it to featured, then if the compilation or shared ToC title also, eventually gets it, then the original featured front page blurb can be modified. I do not see any reason to hold back the game that has a good guide, as the compilation has nothing to do with the original release. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 17:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
**This is off-topic, but Super Mario Bros. Deluxe appears complete. SMB, Deluxe, and the related ToC and sub-pages need some cleanup, but they are close to being featured, too. That collection would be the biggest group of featured guides we could do in one swoop (~4 game catridges off our list). Anyways, with [[Super Mario Advance]], I think postponing featured statuses because an additional, related title isn't featured is unproductive. It is better if we upgrade a guide that deserves it to featured, then if the compilation or shared ToC title also, eventually gets it, then the original featured front page blurb can be modified. I do not see any reason to hold back the game that has a good guide, as the compilation has nothing to do with the original release. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 17:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
:: Alright, all 100 A-coin locations, and all 40 Yoshi Challenge eggs have been documented for Super Mario Advance.  I still think the guide needs a once over by everybody just to make sure that the layouts are optimal, but I can feel better about supporting the nomination now.  Thanks very much guys.  '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 02:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
}}
}}


{{Footer Nav|game=StrategyWiki:Featured guides|prevpage=|nextpage=Successful requests}}
{{Footer Nav|game=StrategyWiki:Featured guides|prevpage=|nextpage=Successful requests}}

Revision as of 02:14, 21 March 2014

These are the current nominations for featured guides, oldest first. Please follow the steps on StrategyWiki:Featured guides to nominate a guide.

Bionic Commando (NES)

Bionic Commando (NES)
Nominated on Notmyhandle (talk contribs) (3/0/0)
Support
  1. Notmyhandle (talk contribs) 01:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  2. Paco (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  3. Akumaxx (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose
Undecided
Comments
  • Looks very complete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Notmyhandle (talkcontribs) .
    • In this case i'll put down a vote for it. I've played it so many years ago. Paco (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
    • The old memories... Akumaxx (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Note that my support comes from: filled out content that has been reviewed by ~2 players (e.g. Akumaxx), very helpful maps, and various images. This guide could be improved, but I think it is quality. --Notmyhandle (talk contribs) 16:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Super Mario Bros. 2

Super Mario Bros. 2
Nominated on RodKimble (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC) (1/0/1)
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Comments
  • Very completed walkthrough helped me out RodKimble (talk) 23:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm very glad that the guide was helpful. However, I wouldn't consider it feature-worthy until all of the additional content from the first Super Mario Advance was included in the guide. If there's enough support, I could always fast-track that one and get it done. Procyon 23:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Procyon: please do! It would knock Super Mario Advance off the list to be completed and get us a new featured guide simultaneously. I will help to clean it up. I see a lot of whitespace. --Notmyhandle (talk contribs) 16:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
      • OK, the main pages are complete, for the most part. I just need to finish taking pictures of all 40 Yoshi eggs (I've got six to go), and the new page will be finished. I encourage everyone to pour over the existing pages and look for errors, or potential layout problems, or just any general improvements that you want to make. Even I have to admit that some of the headlines I used for certain points are a little cheesy... I'm bummed that it doesn't seem like the animated GIFs can be resized anymore. Procyon 01:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Wasn't a previous nomination of Super Mario Bros. rejected as we wanted to get a compilation title like Super Mario Bros. Deluxe featured in one go? Of course, I personally think this guide is good enough to be featured even without the SMA info, but if this nomination is successful I think we should re-nominate Super Mario Bros. as well. T.testLP(talk) 09:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
    • This is off-topic, but Super Mario Bros. Deluxe appears complete. SMB, Deluxe, and the related ToC and sub-pages need some cleanup, but they are close to being featured, too. That collection would be the biggest group of featured guides we could do in one swoop (~4 game catridges off our list). Anyways, with Super Mario Advance, I think postponing featured statuses because an additional, related title isn't featured is unproductive. It is better if we upgrade a guide that deserves it to featured, then if the compilation or shared ToC title also, eventually gets it, then the original featured front page blurb can be modified. I do not see any reason to hold back the game that has a good guide, as the compilation has nothing to do with the original release. --Notmyhandle (talk contribs) 17:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Alright, all 100 A-coin locations, and all 40 Yoshi Challenge eggs have been documented for Super Mario Advance. I still think the guide needs a once over by everybody just to make sure that the layouts are optimal, but I can feel better about supporting the nomination now. Thanks very much guys. Procyon 02:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)