Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Here's how the voting works, if anyone's interested: | Here's how the voting works, if anyone's interested: | ||
# Each nomination has support and oppose votes; the former counts as '''+1''' and the latter as '''-1'''. | # Each nomination has support and oppose votes; the former counts as '''+1''' and the latter as '''-1'''. | ||
# | # At the end of every month, the nomination with the highest '''net''' count is chosen to be that month's collaboration. | ||
#* For ties, the first one nominated is chosen. | #* For ties, the first one nominated is chosen. | ||
# At the end of every month, any | # At the end of every month, any guide with a net count of less than 1 '''and''' a time since nomination of six months, is removed. | ||
==Suggestions== | ==Suggestions== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:Maybe change the numbers a bit. Also something I notice is that hardly anyone apart from the admins and people who use SW a lot take part in any of these votes unless they actually nominate the guide. Because I'm sure there's more users interested in some of these games, but the only ones who seem to vote are the what you might call "SW locals". Like Afro Samurai which was the collab for February. The only page that was created in that guide was an achievements page. Not exactly what I'd call a collaboration.{{User:Melon247/My sig}} 12:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | :Maybe change the numbers a bit. Also something I notice is that hardly anyone apart from the admins and people who use SW a lot take part in any of these votes unless they actually nominate the guide. Because I'm sure there's more users interested in some of these games, but the only ones who seem to vote are the what you might call "SW locals". Like Afro Samurai which was the collab for February. The only page that was created in that guide was an achievements page. Not exactly what I'd call a collaboration.{{User:Melon247/My sig}} 12:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I personally liked seeing the failed ones up there as a reminder of what to think about for these. The collaborations tend to be hit or miss with results. It is nice however to be able to give an early guide some extra attention. Unless it is the most obscure unpopular old game that a user can come up with or it doesn’t qualify I don’t see much reason to oppose a suggested guide (on second thought I would probally oppose a completion level 4 or higher guide. Not much left to add to doesn’t sound like a fun collaboration).--[[User:Zaiqukaj|Zaiqukaj]] | ::I personally liked seeing the failed ones up there as a reminder of what to think about for these. The collaborations tend to be hit or miss with results. It is nice however to be able to give an early guide some extra attention. Unless it is the most obscure unpopular old game that a user can come up with or it doesn’t qualify I don’t see much reason to oppose a suggested guide (on second thought I would probally oppose a completion level 4 or higher guide. Not much left to add to doesn’t sound like a fun collaboration).--[[User:Zaiqukaj|Zaiqukaj]] | ||