Notmyhandle (talk | contribs) (Bionic Commando (NES)) |
(→Carrier Command 2: new section) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | This page chronicles every '''successful''' nomination at a featured guide. '''Do not''' move pages in here yourself unless you are the Sysop that has closed the nomination. Each of these pages get marked with {{t|featured}} by putting the template in GAMENAME/Table of Contents. | ||
{{Featured guides}} | |||
==[[The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past]]== | ==[[The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past]]== | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# Needs a gold star!! <span style="border: 1px solid #888; padding: 1px">'''[[User:Echelon|echelon]]<sub>[[User_talk:Echelon|talk]]</sub>'''</span> 18:36, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | # Needs a gold star!! <span style="border: 1px solid #888; padding: 1px">'''[[User:Echelon|echelon]]<sub>[[User_talk:Echelon|talk]]</sub>'''</span> 18:36, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
# The amount of information and maps is mind-boggling. I give it 3 thumbs up. Woah where'd this third one come from... --[[User:KapKyle|KapKyle]] 23:20, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | # The amount of information and maps is mind-boggling. I give it 3 thumbs up. Woah where'd this third one come from... --[[User:KapKyle|KapKyle]] 23:20, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
# The guide is excellent, the only additions I can think of are to [[The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Palace of the Four Sword|this page]], Great job Proc.--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] | # The guide is excellent, the only additions I can think of are to [[The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Palace of the Four Sword|this page]], Great job Proc.--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] [[File:Rally-X Rock.png|25px|link=User:Rocky]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Rocky|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contributions]])</sup> 12:37, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
<!-- Put your name below if you support, don't forget to sign --> | <!-- Put your name below if you support, don't forget to sign --> | ||
# I think this is amazing, there's so much stuff in here, it'd take a while to even read it all! [[User:Baejung92|Baejung92]] 17:39, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | # I think this is amazing, there's so much stuff in here, it'd take a while to even read it all! [[User:Baejung92|Baejung92]] 17:39, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
*This nomination also serves as a test for the system. Chances are, it will be revised after this nomination is completed (or even mid-nomination, if things are really dysfunctional). --{{User:Ryan Schmidt/sig}} 13:03, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | *This nomination also serves as a test for the system. Chances are, it will be revised after this nomination is completed (or even mid-nomination, if things are really dysfunctional). --{{User:Ryan Schmidt/sig}} 13:03, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
*Rocky, you bring up an excellent point. I actually don't know anything about the specific additions to the GBA version. It seems to me that the GBA specific information should be moved to the GBA version page. The way we used to have parent game relationships, but now I think we just use ToC transclusion. This issue should be resolved ''before'' the guide is promoted. | *Rocky, you bring up an excellent point. I actually don't know anything about the specific additions to the GBA version. It seems to me that the GBA specific information should be moved to the GBA version page. The way we used to have parent game relationships, but now I think we just use ToC transclusion. This issue should be resolved ''before'' the guide is promoted. | ||
**I have it but it's the american version (Ebay, I hate you) so sorry but I can't help you with this one.--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] | **I have it but it's the american version (Ebay, I hate you) so sorry but I can't help you with this one.--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] [[File:Rally-X Rock.png|25px|link=User:Rocky]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Rocky|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contributions]])</sup> 13:49, 11 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
***There hasn't been much discussion of this point, and so far the only person that I've spoken to who objects to those sections being moved is Prod. Quite frankly, he has a good point, using my own prior work against me (grrr…). He points out that I put [[Pokémon Yellow]] information in the [[Pokémon Red and Blue]] walkthrough. While that is a valid point, I counter with the fact that there is no Yellow information ''outside'' of the walkthrough (in what would be considered the appendix if Pok.R&B had an appendix). In fact, features new to Pokémon Yellow that don't quite fit in the walkthrough can be found on their own page exclusive to the Yellow guide. Therefore, it would not be against precedence to move the appendix information out of the SNES guide and into the GBA guide. I'd like to get some kind of consensus on how everyone else feels. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] ([[User talk:Procyon|Talk]]) 15:22, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ***There hasn't been much discussion of this point, and so far the only person that I've spoken to who objects to those sections being moved is Prod. Quite frankly, he has a good point, using my own prior work against me (grrr…). He points out that I put [[Pokémon Yellow]] information in the [[Pokémon Red and Blue]] walkthrough. While that is a valid point, I counter with the fact that there is no Yellow information ''outside'' of the walkthrough (in what would be considered the appendix if Pok.R&B had an appendix). In fact, features new to Pokémon Yellow that don't quite fit in the walkthrough can be found on their own page exclusive to the Yellow guide. Therefore, it would not be against precedence to move the appendix information out of the SNES guide and into the GBA guide. I'd like to get some kind of consensus on how everyone else feels. [[User:Procyon|Procyon]] ([[User talk:Procyon|Talk]]) 15:22, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
****I've decided that I'm completely undecided about transclusion versus inclusion >.<. I'm trying to decide on a proper scheme for this right now. I'm currently at: If there is a completely new section to the game, that gets it's page within it's separate guide, and you transclude the original toc with the new pages added on (the "what's new" page in Pokemon Yellow). If there are minor additions (like an extra item in a specific location) that belongs with the main guide (like the fact that you can only start with pikachu). I would say this is featured as an SNES game, but not as a GBA game. The problem is, this messes with our one game one guide policy (now we're at 4 games (RGBY), one guide >_>) -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 15:54, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ****I've decided that I'm completely undecided about transclusion versus inclusion >.<. I'm trying to decide on a proper scheme for this right now. I'm currently at: If there is a completely new section to the game, that gets it's page within it's separate guide, and you transclude the original toc with the new pages added on (the "what's new" page in Pokemon Yellow). If there are minor additions (like an extra item in a specific location) that belongs with the main guide (like the fact that you can only start with pikachu). I would say this is featured as an SNES game, but not as a GBA game. The problem is, this messes with our one game one guide policy (now we're at 4 games (RGBY), one guide >_>) -- [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|Talk]]) 15:54, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
*****To be honest, I'm kinda neutral in this but if you think about it, it'll be an easy 2nd stage 5 completed guide when it's done and that's a good thing, right guys. (Atm I think it's 1 stage 5 and 1 stage 3 guide at the moment). We need to bring this up in community issues and set a standard.(quickly said after conflict) Prod, it's a new game in there, the two slightly interling, you get the ridlle quest and a new sword technique and the palace of the flour sword in a link to the past--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] | *****To be honest, I'm kinda neutral in this but if you think about it, it'll be an easy 2nd stage 5 completed guide when it's done and that's a good thing, right guys. (Atm I think it's 1 stage 5 and 1 stage 3 guide at the moment). We need to bring this up in community issues and set a standard.(quickly said after conflict) Prod, it's a new game in there, the two slightly interling, you get the ridlle quest and a new sword technique and the palace of the flour sword in a link to the past--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] [[File:Rally-X Rock.png|25px|link=User:Rocky]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Rocky|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contributions]])</sup> 15:57, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
******I would have to argue that whatever our decision should be, it should not confuse the reader. If the reader has a copy of LttP for the GBA, they're going to look for our LttP guide, possibly without knowing there are multiple versions of the game (if they are a younger gamer, for instance). I suggest for simplicity's sake that we stick to inclusion (prevents redundancy and is better for SEO--search engines penalize duplicate content!) and outline any differences with special sidebars or pages as they are necessary. My two cents. <span style="border: 1px solid #888; padding: 1px">'''[[User:Echelon|echelon]]<sub>[[User_talk:Echelon|talk]]</sub>'''</span> 20:11, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ******I would have to argue that whatever our decision should be, it should not confuse the reader. If the reader has a copy of LttP for the GBA, they're going to look for our LttP guide, possibly without knowing there are multiple versions of the game (if they are a younger gamer, for instance). I suggest for simplicity's sake that we stick to inclusion (prevents redundancy and is better for SEO--search engines penalize duplicate content!) and outline any differences with special sidebars or pages as they are necessary. My two cents. <span style="border: 1px solid #888; padding: 1px">'''[[User:Echelon|echelon]]<sub>[[User_talk:Echelon|talk]]</sub>'''</span> 20:11, 12 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
*******I just realised, we'll need to add a section in the lost woods about not getting the Fake Swords (for the riddle quest), that's the only change I think of now--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] | *******I just realised, we'll need to add a section in the lost woods about not getting the Fake Swords (for the riddle quest), that's the only change I think of now--[[User:Rocky|Rocky]] [[File:Rally-X Rock.png|25px|link=User:Rocky]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Rocky|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rocky|Contributions]])</sup> 03:36, 14 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
**I have gotten rid of the red links in the Zelda navigation bar at the bottom, so I think its truly worthy now. Once we solve the transclusion/etc. problem let's go ahead and make it official!--'''[[User:Dukeruckley|<font color="blue">Duke</font>]][[User_talk:Dukeruckley|<font color="red">Ruckley</font>]]''' 17:59, 13 August 2007 (CDT) | **I have gotten rid of the red links in the Zelda navigation bar at the bottom, so I think its truly worthy now. Once we solve the transclusion/etc. problem let's go ahead and make it official!--'''[[User:Dukeruckley|<font color="blue">Duke</font>]][[User_talk:Dukeruckley|<font color="red">Ruckley</font>]]''' 17:59, 13 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
***Agreed. Of course, we'll have to determine how '''long''' it stays as the currently featured guide (one month, two months?) --{{User:Ryan Schmidt/sig}} 18:02, 13 August 2007 (CDT) | ***Agreed. Of course, we'll have to determine how '''long''' it stays as the currently featured guide (one month, two months?) --{{User:Ryan Schmidt/sig}} 18:02, 13 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Line 463: | Line 463: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | ==[[Star Wars: Squadrons]]== | ||
{{VFG | |||
|title=Star Wars: Squadrons | |||
|day=30 | |||
|month=10 | |||
|year=2020 | |||
|date=02:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
|supnum=3 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you SUPPORT --> | |||
|oppnum=0 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you OPPOSE --> | |||
|undnum=0 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you are UNDECIDED --> | |||
|support= | |||
# <!-- Put reason for your nomination here (remove this comment before saving) --> --[[User:Arrow|Arrow Windwhistler]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 02:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
# [[User:Sigma 7|Sigma 7]] ([[User talk:Sigma 7|talk]]) 06:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
# [[User:E-123Wario54|<span style="color:Purple">'''Wario'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:E-123Wario54|<span style="color:Blue">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 17:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you support, don't forget to sign --> | |||
|oppose= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you oppose, don't forget to sign --> | |||
|undecided= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you are currently undecided, don't forget to sign --> | |||
|comments= | |||
*Mission accomplished. Thankfully the game was built in such a way that I could actually start and finish this guide to a degree I'm satisfied. Anything I'm missing, though? --[[User:Arrow|Arrow Windwhistler]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 02:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
* The only flaw I can find is that the starfighter images seem a little zoomed in, but that likely seems to be an in-game representation. Otherwise, it seems to be a good choice to showcase. --[[User:Sigma 7|Sigma 7]] ([[User talk:Sigma 7|talk]]) 06:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
==[[Eggerland Meikyuu no Fukkatsu]]== | |||
{{VFG | |||
|title=Eggerland Meikyuu no Fukkatsu | |||
|day=19 | |||
|month=09 | |||
|year=2014 | |||
|date=16:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
|supnum=4 <!-- Remember to add 1 to this if you SUPPORT --> | |||
|oppnum=0 <!-- Remember to add 1 to this if you OPPOSE --> | |||
|undnum=0 <!-- Remember to add 1 to this if you are UNDECIDED --> | |||
|support= | |||
#This guide was at completion stage four very early on when Procyon finished the guide. It has had ample revisions from multiple editors' for accuracy and the best strategies. The guide meets our standards for completeness, the required number of images is met, and it is fully complete. --{{User:Notmyhandle/Sig}} 16:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you support, remember to sign --> | |||
# Although it's one of the more obscure games in the Lolo series, it contains a lot of the same puzzles that would go on the grace the American releases. I think this guide came out pretty well. Thanks for the nomination NMH! '''[[User:Procyon|<span style="color:red">Pro</span>]][[User talk:Procyon|<span style="color:grey">cyon</span>]]''' 17:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
# I'm not sure why this has been stuck in the Featured guide queue for 3 years, but the guide looks well-written and complete. I see no reason why it shouldn't be promoted. —[[User:Thunderforge|Thunderforge]] ([[User talk:Thunderforge|talk]]) 02:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
# I was the one who reorganized the table of contents. Of course I support this! Was it five years ago already??? --[[User:Abacos|Abacos]] ([[User talk:Abacos|talk]]) 14:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
# By the Gods, it's been ''seven'' years and this thing hasn't been promoted???? [[User:Arrow|Arrow Windwhistler]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 10:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
|oppose= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you oppose, remember to sign --> | |||
|undecided= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you are currently undecided, remember to sign --> | |||
|comments= | |||
<!-- Put general comments below, don't forget to sign --> | |||
}} | |||
== [[Carrier Command 2]] == | |||
{{VFG | |||
|title=Carrier Command 2 | |||
|day=9 | |||
|month=09 | |||
|year=2021 | |||
|date=16:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
|supnum=2 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you SUPPORT --> | |||
|oppnum=0 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you OPPOSE --> | |||
|undnum=0 <!-- Don't forget to add 1 to this if you are UNDECIDED --> | |||
|support= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you support, don't forget to sign --> | |||
# --[[User:Arrow|Arrow]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 16:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
- That [[UserTalk:Demon Pikachu|<span style="color:red;font-variant:small-caps;">Funky </span>]] [[User:Demon Pikachu|<span style="color:#A50000;font-variant:small-caps;"> Demon Pikachu</span>]] 18:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
|oppose= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you oppose, don't forget to sign --> | |||
|undecided= | |||
<!-- Put your name below if you are currently undecided, don't forget to sign --> | |||
|comments= | |||
<!-- Put general comments below, don't forget to sign --> | |||
*To be honest, I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this guide. On one hand, it's complete in every way it can be. I suppose I'm more worried about upkeep, as the game is changing a fair bit at the moment. At the same time, however, I'm super glad that I've been able to hit the top spot on Google with this guide, and reception overall seems to be pretty positive. I'm nominating the guide, but on the other hand I don't want to break my "Featured Guide" streak by having it be added to [[StrategyWiki:Featured_guides/Unsuccessful_requests|Unsuccessful requests]] haha...[[User:Arrow|Arrow]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 16:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
*Yeah, I just looked at the guide. It actually looks good. I'm not a fan of this series, but even I know it should be made a stage 5. - That [[UserTalk:Demon Pikachu|<span style="color:red;font-variant:small-caps;">Funky </span>]] [[User:Demon Pikachu|<span style="color:#A50000;font-variant:small-caps;"> Demon Pikachu</span>]] 18:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
* The Walkthrough is just one page covering the tutorial, with the rest of the subpages under the Gameplay heading. Not sure if that's good or bad. It's a procedurally generated game so I'm not sure what you'd put under the Walkthrough heading.--[[User:Henke37|Henke37]] ([[User talk:Henke37|talk]]) 17:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
**I think the Walkthrough page in general is pretty moot for games that have a running campaign and such. Arcade games like [[Zaxxon]] or [[Ms. Pac-Man]] only need a single Walkthrough page. On the other hand, more modern games - especially those with a story-driven campaign consisting of multiple missions - can afford to have subpages for each mission level, mostly negating the point of the base Walkthrough page. So I think you could easily get rid of the default walkthrough page for a number of modern games as a result. --[[User:Arrow|Arrow]] ([[User talk:Arrow|talk]]) 17:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 21:16, 11 November 2022
This page chronicles every successful nomination at a featured guide. Do not move pages in here yourself unless you are the Sysop that has closed the nomination. Each of these pages get marked with {{featured}} by putting the template in GAMENAME/Table of Contents.
The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past[edit]
Status update:The Palace of the Four Sword walkthrough is complete! Procyon (Talk) 01:53, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past | |
---|---|
Nominated on 13:35, 9 August 2007 (CDT) (11/0/1) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Pokémon Red and Blue[edit]
Pokémon Red and Blue | |
---|---|
Nominated on 21:51, 4 December 2007 (CST) (6/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Battlestations: Midway[edit]
Battlestations: Midway | |
---|---|
Nominated on 18:14, 15 January 2008 (CST) (5/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Pocket Fighter[edit]
Pocket Fighter | |
---|---|
Nominated on 22:10, 12 December 2007 (CST) (7/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
Pocket Fighter is one of the last fighting games that I planned on working on, and in all honesty, I think that it came out the best. I had planned on nominating the Street Fighter II guide first (once I got all the moves pictured), but I put so much into this guide, I can't think of another thing to cram into it. I can't think of a reference of cameo that I didn't mention. For the record, this guide contains:
So... while it could be expanded upon (like, by adding images of how each of the moves improve by levels, or all of the color selections... which I might add some day), I think it's pretty comprehensive state. Procyon (Talk) 22:10, 12 December 2007 (CST)
|
Castlevania: Circle of the Moon[edit]
Castlevania: Circle of the Moon | |
---|---|
Nominated on 20:10, 6 March 2008 (CST) (7/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Donkey Kong[edit]
Donkey Kong | |
---|---|
Nominated on 00:28, 30 July 2008 (CDT) (4/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Dog's Life[edit]
Dog's Life | |
---|---|
Nominated on 10:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC) (7/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
|
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney[edit]
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney | |
---|---|
Nominated on 04:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC) (10/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose |
|
Undecided |
|
Comments |
|
Battlestations: Pacific[edit]
Battlestations: Pacific | |
---|---|
Nominated on 02:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC) (4/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
Well, after almost 2 years of work...it's done. --Arrow Windwhistler (talk) 02:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Justice For All[edit]
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Justice For All | |
---|---|
Nominated on 06:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC) (4/0/0) | |
Support | |
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
|
Portal[edit]
Portal | |
---|---|
Nominated on 21:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC) (4/0/0) | |
Support | |
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
Ceegers has filled in all of the advanced strategies and challenge info. I verified 80-90% of the guide. I think it is ready. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 21:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC) Took me a while to get around to everything I wanted to with this, but I finally got there. The advanced techniques page also helps to clarify some tougher things, like how to go about completing chambers with few enough steps for the gold challenges. Let me know if you have any suggestions on anything! -- Ceegers (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
The guide was completed years ago, but Ceegers (talk · contribs) has put the finishing touches on it. I think this one only needs a spit shine to make it into our elite. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 21:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC) Thanks :) The advanced and challenges sections (Chambers 13-18) still need adjusting, which I will be getting to soon. I'm also thinking that an additional appendix page Advanced Techniques would be a good idea. In a game like this, it is absolutely impossible to describe every way to complete a puzzle, and the developers intended it as such, but advanced techniques could be an excellent place to describe methods that may help in various chambers. This could also include some general hints for how to decrease portals, steps, and time in the challenges. I'm also good friends with one of the glitch masters of this game, so I can get a ton of info on them, which could be included, but I am somewhat inclined to not include glitches (however... at what point something becomes a glitch as opposed to being part of the game is debatable in this case). One last thought... looks like the guide's supposed to have no red links... which I guess means something would have to be created for Narbacular Drop and Portal (Commodore 64)? Seems like a weird requirement, since those really have nothing to do with this game... -- Ceegers (talk) 10:37, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
|
Bionic Commando (NES)[edit]
Bionic Commando (NES) | |
---|---|
Nominated on Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) (4/0/0) | |
Support | |
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
Note that my support comes from: filled out content that has been reviewed by ~2 players (e.g. Akumaxx), very helpful maps, and various images. This guide could be improved, but I think it is quality. --Notmyhandle (talk • contribs) 16:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Star Wars: Squadrons[edit]
Star Wars: Squadrons | |
---|---|
Nominated on 02:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC) (3/0/0) | |
Support | |
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
|
Eggerland Meikyuu no Fukkatsu[edit]
Eggerland Meikyuu no Fukkatsu | |
---|---|
Nominated on 16:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC) (4/0/0) | |
Support |
|
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
Carrier Command 2[edit]
Carrier Command 2 | |
---|---|
Nominated on 16:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC) (2/0/0) | |
Support |
- That Funky Demon Pikachu 18:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC) |
Oppose | |
Undecided | |
Comments |
|