Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* The defendant's prints were on the tape. I guess she must've moved it during the show. | * The defendant's prints were on the tape. I guess she must've moved it during the show. | ||
'''Present''' the '''Fingerprinting Results''' on that '''new statement'''. | '''Present''' the '''Fingerprinting Results''' on that '''new statement'''. | ||
Apollo says that it's impossible for Trucy to have moved the tape during the show. Her fingerprints weren't found on the coffin, but they were found on the tape. However Trucy wears gloves when she performs, so she couldn't have moved the tape! She must've moved it before the show, so she didn't move it to mislead the victim! Even without evidence, the victim still used the tape as a guide, and still climbed into the coffin where Trucy thrusted her sword into, Prosecutor Sahdmadhi says. So instead of murder, it was involuntary manslaughter! | Apollo says that it's impossible for Trucy to have moved the tape during the show. Her fingerprints weren't found on the coffin, but they were found on the tape. However Trucy wears gloves when she performs, so she couldn't have moved the tape! She must've moved it before the show, so she didn't move it to mislead the victim! Even without evidence, the victim still used the tape as a guide, and still climbed into the coffin where Trucy thrusted her sword into, Prosecutor Sahdmadhi says. So instead of murder, it was involuntary manslaughter! | ||